Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.
o3-pro is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 71 to 31. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
o3-pro's sharpest advantage is in reasoning, where it averages 83.6 against 35.3. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is GPQA, 89 to 24.
o3-pro gives you the larger context window at 200K, compared with 128K for Ministral 3 3B (Reasoning).
Pick o3-pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Ministral 3 3B (Reasoning) only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
o3-pro
70.4
Ministral 3 3B (Reasoning)
34
o3-pro
49.2
Ministral 3 3B (Reasoning)
7.2
o3-pro
74.1
Ministral 3 3B (Reasoning)
30.4
o3-pro
83.6
Ministral 3 3B (Reasoning)
35.3
o3-pro
67.1
Ministral 3 3B (Reasoning)
25.2
o3-pro
82
Ministral 3 3B (Reasoning)
68
o3-pro
81.1
Ministral 3 3B (Reasoning)
59.7
o3-pro
89
Ministral 3 3B (Reasoning)
40.9
o3-pro is ahead overall, 71 to 31. The biggest single separator in this matchup is GPQA, where the scores are 89 and 24.
o3-pro has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 67.1 versus 25.2. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
o3-pro has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 49.2 versus 7.2. Inside this category, HumanEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
o3-pro has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 89 versus 40.9. Inside this category, AIME 2023 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
o3-pro has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 83.6 versus 35.3. Inside this category, SimpleQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
o3-pro has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 70.4 versus 34. Inside this category, BrowseComp is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
o3-pro has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 74.1 versus 30.4. Inside this category, MMMU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
o3-pro has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 82 versus 68. Inside this category, IFEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
o3-pro has the edge for multilingual tasks in this comparison, averaging 81.1 versus 59.7. Inside this category, MGSM is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.