Side-by-side benchmark comparison across knowledge, coding, math, and reasoning.
Qwen3 235B 2507 is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 38 to 28. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Qwen3 235B 2507 gives you the larger context window at 128K, compared with 64K for Mixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1.
Pick Qwen3 235B 2507 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Mixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1 only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.
Qwen3 235B 2507
33.2
Mixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1
71.4
Qwen3 235B 2507
18.7
Mixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1
54.8
Qwen3 235B 2507 is ahead overall, 38 to 28. The biggest single separator in this matchup is MMLU, where the scores are 39 and 71.4.
Mixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 71.4 versus 33.2. Inside this category, MMLU is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Mixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 54.8 versus 18.7. Inside this category, HumanEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.