Skip to main content

Model comparison

Nemotron Ultra 253B vs Phi-4

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 11 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

44.4/100
Margin
21.7pts
← winning
Microsoft
22.69/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Nemotron Ultra 253B #150 (Estimated); Phi-4 #192 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Nemotron Ultra 253B and Phi-4 share 11 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 0 results are unique to Nemotron Ultra 253B; 0 to Phi-4.

Updated July 24, 2026
Shared results
11
Nemotron Ultra 253B only
0
Phi-4 only
0
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Nemotron Ultra 253B and Phi-4 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 11 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Nemotron Ultra 253B has the larger context window at 32K, compared with 16K for Phi-4.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricNemotron Ultra 253BPhi-4Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensNemotron Ultra 253B$0 input / $0 outputPhi-4$0 input / $0 outputListed prices are equal.
Generation speedtokens per secondNemotron Ultra 253BNot availablePhi-435 tok/sA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenNemotron Ultra 253BNot availablePhi-42.02 sA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensNemotron Ultra 253B32KPhi-416KNemotron Ultra 253B lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkNemotron Ultra 253BPhi-4Result
τ²-bench resultsSource 11.4%0%Nemotron Ultra 253B leads
Coding
BenchmarkNemotron Ultra 253BPhi-4Result
AA-SciCodeSource 34.7%26.0%Nemotron Ultra 253B leads
Reasoning
BenchmarkNemotron Ultra 253BPhi-4Result
AA-LCRSource 7.3%0.0%Nemotron Ultra 253B leads
CritPtSource 0.0%0.0%Tie
Knowledge
BenchmarkNemotron Ultra 253BPhi-4Result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 9.1%4.9%Nemotron Ultra 253B leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 72.8%57.5%Nemotron Ultra 253B leads
AA-HLESource 8.1%4.1%Nemotron Ultra 253B leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -45.5%-56.7%Nemotron Ultra 253B leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 19.9%13.2%Nemotron Ultra 253B leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 81.7%80.5%Phi-4 leads
Inst. Following
BenchmarkNemotron Ultra 253BPhi-4Result
AA-IFBenchSource 38.2%23.5%Nemotron Ultra 253B leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Nemotron Ultra 253B and Phi-4 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Nemotron Ultra 253B and Phi-4 today?

Nemotron Ultra 253B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Phi-4: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 24, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.