o3 vs Seed-2.0-Mini

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.

o3 is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 70 to 53. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

o3's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 49.1 against 24.7. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is SWE-bench Pro, 58 to 29. Seed-2.0-Mini does hit back in multimodal & grounded, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

o3 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $10.00 input / $40.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.10 input / $0.40 output per 1M tokens for Seed-2.0-Mini. That is roughly 100.0x on output cost alone. o3 is the reasoning model in the pair, while Seed-2.0-Mini is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. Seed-2.0-Mini gives you the larger context window at 256K, compared with 200K for o3.

Quick Verdict

Pick o3 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Seed-2.0-Mini only becomes the better choice if multimodal & grounded is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.

Agentic

o3

o3

69.9

Seed-2.0-Mini

46.2

71
Terminal-Bench 2.0
43
75
BrowseComp
53
65
OSWorld-Verified
45

Coding

o3

o3

49.1

Seed-2.0-Mini

24.7

78
HumanEval
55
50
SWE-bench Verified
22
40
LiveCodeBench
21
58
SWE-bench Pro
29

Multimodal & Grounded

Seed-2.0-Mini

o3

72.3

Seed-2.0-Mini

73.1

70
MMMU-Pro
74
75
OfficeQA Pro
72

Reasoning

o3

o3

82.6

Seed-2.0-Mini

64.8

84
SimpleQA
59
82
MuSR
57
86
BBH
73
82
LongBench v2
68
81
MRCRv2
72

Knowledge

o3

o3

66

Seed-2.0-Mini

44.6

86
MMLU
62
87
GPQA
61
85
SuperGPQA
59
83
OpenBookQA
57
75
MMLU-Pro
62
24
HLE
1
77
FrontierScience
54

Instruction Following

o3

o3

85

Seed-2.0-Mini

80

85
IFEval
80

Multilingual

o3

o3

81.1

Seed-2.0-Mini

71.8

83
MGSM
75
80
MMLU-ProX
70

Mathematics

o3

o3

87.5

Seed-2.0-Mini

65.1

88
AIME 2023
62
90
AIME 2024
64
89
AIME 2025
63
84
HMMT Feb 2023
58
86
HMMT Feb 2024
60
85
HMMT Feb 2025
59
87
BRUMO 2025
61
88
MATH-500
70

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, o3 or Seed-2.0-Mini?

o3 is ahead overall, 70 to 53. The biggest single separator in this matchup is SWE-bench Pro, where the scores are 58 and 29.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, o3 or Seed-2.0-Mini?

o3 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 66 versus 44.6. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, o3 or Seed-2.0-Mini?

o3 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 49.1 versus 24.7. Inside this category, SWE-bench Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for math, o3 or Seed-2.0-Mini?

o3 has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 87.5 versus 65.1. Inside this category, AIME 2023 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for reasoning, o3 or Seed-2.0-Mini?

o3 has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 82.6 versus 64.8. Inside this category, SimpleQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, o3 or Seed-2.0-Mini?

o3 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 69.9 versus 46.2. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, o3 or Seed-2.0-Mini?

Seed-2.0-Mini has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 73.1 versus 72.3. Inside this category, MMMU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for instruction following, o3 or Seed-2.0-Mini?

o3 has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 85 versus 80. Inside this category, IFEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multilingual tasks, o3 or Seed-2.0-Mini?

o3 has the edge for multilingual tasks in this comparison, averaging 81.1 versus 71.8. Inside this category, MMLU-ProX is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Last updated: March 12, 2026

Weekly LLM Benchmark Digest

Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.