Skip to main content

Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)

72

VS

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

68

1 categoriesvs2 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) unranked · Qwen3.5-122B-A10B #6

Pick Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority or you need the larger 262K context window.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)
65.4vs56.1

+9.3 difference

Coding

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
54.1vs72

+17.9 difference

Knowledge

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
73.9vs81.6

+7.7 difference

Operational Comparison

Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Price (per 1M tokens)

N/A

$0 / $0

Speed

N/A

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

N/A

N/A

Context Window

256K

262K

Quick Verdict

Pick Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority or you need the larger 262K context window.

Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 72 to 68. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)'s sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 65.4 against 56.1. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 65.4% to 49.4%. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B does hit back in coding, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B gives you the larger context window at 262K, compared with 256K for Qwen 3.6 Max (preview).

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 72 to 68. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 65.4% and 49.4%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 81.6 versus 73.9. Inside this category, SuperGPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 72 versus 54.1. Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 65.4 versus 56.1. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: April 20, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.