Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.
Seed-2.0-Lite is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 63 to 42. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Seed-2.0-Lite's sharpest advantage is in multimodal & grounded, where it averages 79.6 against 42.1. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is MMMU-Pro, 80 to 38.
Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) is the reasoning model in the pair, while Seed-2.0-Lite is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. Seed-2.0-Lite gives you the larger context window at 256K, compared with 128K for Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning).
Pick Seed-2.0-Lite if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) only becomes the better choice if you want the stronger reasoning-first profile.
Seed-2.0-Lite
55.1
Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)
45.9
Seed-2.0-Lite
41.4
Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)
22.8
Seed-2.0-Lite
79.6
Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)
42.1
Seed-2.0-Lite
73
Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)
49
Seed-2.0-Lite
53.9
Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)
34.1
Seed-2.0-Lite
89
Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)
68
Seed-2.0-Lite
82.5
Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)
58.8
Seed-2.0-Lite
75
Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)
48.5
Seed-2.0-Lite is ahead overall, 63 to 42. The biggest single separator in this matchup is MMMU-Pro, where the scores are 80 and 38.
Seed-2.0-Lite has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 53.9 versus 34.1. Inside this category, MMLU is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Seed-2.0-Lite has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 41.4 versus 22.8. Inside this category, HumanEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Seed-2.0-Lite has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 75 versus 48.5. Inside this category, AIME 2023 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Seed-2.0-Lite has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 73 versus 49. Inside this category, SimpleQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Seed-2.0-Lite has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 55.1 versus 45.9. Inside this category, BrowseComp is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Seed-2.0-Lite has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 79.6 versus 42.1. Inside this category, MMMU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Seed-2.0-Lite has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 89 versus 68. Inside this category, IFEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Seed-2.0-Lite has the edge for multilingual tasks in this comparison, averaging 82.5 versus 58.8. Inside this category, MGSM is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.