Seed-2.0-Mini vs Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.

Seed-2.0-Mini is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 53 to 42. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Seed-2.0-Mini's sharpest advantage is in multimodal & grounded, where it averages 73.1 against 42.1. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is MMMU-Pro, 74 to 38.

Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) is the reasoning model in the pair, while Seed-2.0-Mini is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. Seed-2.0-Mini gives you the larger context window at 256K, compared with 128K for Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning).

Quick Verdict

Pick Seed-2.0-Mini if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) only becomes the better choice if you want the stronger reasoning-first profile.

Agentic

Seed-2.0-Mini

Seed-2.0-Mini

46.2

Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)

45.9

43
Terminal-Bench 2.0
47
53
BrowseComp
48
45
OSWorld-Verified
43

Coding

Seed-2.0-Mini

Seed-2.0-Mini

24.7

Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)

22.8

55
HumanEval
32
22
SWE-bench Verified
16
21
LiveCodeBench
18
29
SWE-bench Pro
29

Multimodal & Grounded

Seed-2.0-Mini

Seed-2.0-Mini

73.1

Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)

42.1

74
MMMU-Pro
38
72
OfficeQA Pro
47

Reasoning

Seed-2.0-Mini

Seed-2.0-Mini

64.8

Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)

49

59
SimpleQA
38
57
MuSR
36
73
BBH
63
68
LongBench v2
58
72
MRCRv2
58

Knowledge

Seed-2.0-Mini

Seed-2.0-Mini

44.6

Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)

34.1

62
MMLU
40
61
GPQA
39
59
SuperGPQA
37
57
OpenBookQA
35
62
MMLU-Pro
51
1
HLE
6
54
FrontierScience
42

Instruction Following

Seed-2.0-Mini

Seed-2.0-Mini

80

Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)

68

80
IFEval
68

Multilingual

Seed-2.0-Mini

Seed-2.0-Mini

71.8

Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)

58.8

75
MGSM
62
70
MMLU-ProX
57

Mathematics

Seed-2.0-Mini

Seed-2.0-Mini

65.1

Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)

48.5

62
AIME 2023
40
64
AIME 2024
42
63
AIME 2025
41
58
HMMT Feb 2023
36
60
HMMT Feb 2024
38
59
HMMT Feb 2025
37
61
BRUMO 2025
39
70
MATH-500
60

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Seed-2.0-Mini or Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)?

Seed-2.0-Mini is ahead overall, 53 to 42. The biggest single separator in this matchup is MMMU-Pro, where the scores are 74 and 38.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Seed-2.0-Mini or Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)?

Seed-2.0-Mini has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 44.6 versus 34.1. Inside this category, MMLU is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, Seed-2.0-Mini or Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)?

Seed-2.0-Mini has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 24.7 versus 22.8. Inside this category, HumanEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for math, Seed-2.0-Mini or Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)?

Seed-2.0-Mini has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 65.1 versus 48.5. Inside this category, AIME 2023 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for reasoning, Seed-2.0-Mini or Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)?

Seed-2.0-Mini has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 64.8 versus 49. Inside this category, SimpleQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Seed-2.0-Mini or Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)?

Seed-2.0-Mini has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 46.2 versus 45.9. Inside this category, BrowseComp is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, Seed-2.0-Mini or Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)?

Seed-2.0-Mini has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 73.1 versus 42.1. Inside this category, MMMU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for instruction following, Seed-2.0-Mini or Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)?

Seed-2.0-Mini has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 80 versus 68. Inside this category, IFEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multilingual tasks, Seed-2.0-Mini or Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)?

Seed-2.0-Mini has the edge for multilingual tasks in this comparison, averaging 71.8 versus 58.8. Inside this category, MGSM is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Last updated: March 12, 2026

Weekly LLM Benchmark Digest

Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.