Skip to main content

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

Head-to-head comparison across 6benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

65

VS

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

56

6 categoriesvs0 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B #8 · Qwen3.5-35B-A3B #18

Pick Qwen3.5-122B-A10B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.5-35B-A3B only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
56.1vs50.6

+5.5 difference

Coding

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
72vs58.4

+13.6 difference

Reasoning

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
60.2vs59

+1.2 difference

Knowledge

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
81.6vs79.3

+2.3 difference

Multilingual

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
82.2vs81

+1.2 difference

Inst. Following

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
93.4vs91.9

+1.5 difference

Operational Comparison

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

Price (per 1M tokens)

$0 / $0

$0 / $0

Speed

N/A

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

N/A

N/A

Context Window

262K

262K

Quick Verdict

Pick Qwen3.5-122B-A10B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.5-35B-A3B only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 65 to 56. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 72 against 58.4. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 49.4% to 40.5%.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (7)

Which is better, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B or Qwen3.5-35B-A3B?

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 65 to 56. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 49.4% and 40.5%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B or Qwen3.5-35B-A3B?

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 81.6 versus 79.3. Inside this category, SuperGPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B or Qwen3.5-35B-A3B?

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 72 versus 58.4. Inside this category, SWE-bench Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for reasoning, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B or Qwen3.5-35B-A3B?

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 60.2 versus 59. Inside this category, LongBench v2 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B or Qwen3.5-35B-A3B?

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 56.1 versus 50.6. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for instruction following, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B or Qwen3.5-35B-A3B?

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 93.4 versus 91.9. Inside this category, IFEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multilingual tasks, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B or Qwen3.5-35B-A3B?

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the edge for multilingual tasks in this comparison, averaging 82.2 versus 81. Inside this category, MMLU-ProX is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: May 13, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.