Capability
48.6/100
field median 59.1
#148 of 230 ranked models
Five or fewer confirmed AI changes, with original sources, on mornings when something changed.A free source-linked morning brief.
See the free Radar BriefReleased June 2024 — see all recent releases
Data as of September 2, 2026 · How the score is built
Published rows are visible, but no category has enough eligible evidence for a comparative rank.
4 published rows leave some tracked benchmark slots empty. Independent runtime speed has not been measured.
Each value carries a field reference instead of floating alone. Markers compare this model with the current ranked and priced catalog; they are not absolute quality thresholds.
Capability
48.6/100
field median 59.1
#148 of 230 ranked models
Price
$3input / $15 output
input median $1
blended $9
Speed
Not measured
field median 90 tok/s
Time to first token not measured
Context
200Ktokens
field median 256,000
Reported for this model; direct source link not stored
Published API price against the public score. The x-axis uses a log scale; the dashed path marks models that are not beaten by a cheaper, higher-scoring option. Price uses average of published input and output rates.
The chart opens on the current model. Scroll horizontally to inspect the full price axis.
Horizontal: blended price per million tokens, log scale · Vertical: public score
Coverage is split by category so a strong number never hides a thin evidence base. Verified means the row is tied to a published source; provisional rows remain visible but separate.
Each documented value carries its source. Missing fields stay visible as not sourced or not published, rather than disappearing from the page.
Scores and ranks appear only where published evidence can be displayed. The table keeps the score, weight, cohort, and evidence state together.
| Category | Score | Rank | Percentile | Weight | Benchmarks | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AgenticWeight 22%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 22% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| CodingRank Not rankedWeight 20%1 benchmarkReported | 42.0 | Not ranked | Not available | 20% | 1 benchmark | Reported |
| ReasoningWeight 17%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 17% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| KnowledgeRank Not rankedWeight 12%1 benchmarkReported | 39.9 | Not ranked | Not available | 12% | 1 benchmark | Reported |
| MathRank Not rankedWeight 5%2 benchmarksVerified | 25.7 | Not ranked | Not available | 5% | 2 benchmarks | Verified |
| MultilingualWeight 7%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 7% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| MultimodalWeight 12%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 12% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| Inst. FollowingWeight 5%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 5% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
Coding opens by default. The marker compares each value with the best source-verified result in the catalog; provisional leaders do not set the reference. Expand the remaining categories for every published row.
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench VerifiedSoftware Engineering Benchmark Verified | Score49% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Claude Opus 5 · 96% | Gap47 behind | WeightWeighted 16% | Reported |
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPQAGraduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A | Score59.4% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Sakana Fugu-Ultra · 95.5% | Gap36.1 behind | WeightWeighted 7% | Reported |
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)FrontierMath v2 Tiers 1-3 | Score2.069% | Versus best verified row Best verified: GPT-5.6 Sol · 89.000% | Gap86.9 behind | WeightWeighted 30% | Benchmark exact |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)FrontierMath v2 Tier 4 | Score0.000% | Versus best verified row Best verified: GPT-5.6 Sol · 83.000% | Gap83 behind | WeightWeighted 10% | Benchmark exact |
This chart appears only when at least two dated first-party price records exist for the exact model. It shows rate changes, not an inferred cost trend.
3 dated first-party price records. The newest record lists $15 per million tokens.
The sequence follows explicit supersedes links. A successor's displayed score stays at least 0.1 points above its predecessor; raw benchmark rows do not move. Scores and prices remain blank when the corresponding public row or first-party rate is unavailable.
June 2024 · you are here
Claude 3.5 SonnetScore 48.6 · $3 / $15
Base entry
The visual layer above carries the decisions. These notes preserve the model, ranking, coverage, and family context behind the numbers.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet ranks #148 of 230 on the public leaderboard with a score of 48.58/100. It does not yet have enough sourced coverage for a verified position.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet is a proprietary model with a 200K context window. No explicit reasoning mode is documented in this profile.
4 of 416 tracked benchmark slots currently have displayable evidence. Missing categories stay blank.
Anthropic · Model release
Radar confirmed these at the source. Already tracking Claude 3.5 Sonnet? See the free Radar Brief for what changes next.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet ranks #148 out of 230 models on the public BenchAlign leaderboard, with a score of 48.58/100. Its evidence status is Estimated, and this profile shows 4 source-displayable benchmark rows. The label describes evidence depth, not a provider quality claim; inspect category rows before choosing a workload.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet has source-displayable benchmark coverage for knowledge and understanding, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet has source-displayable benchmark coverage for coding and programming, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet has source-displayable benchmark coverage for mathematics, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.
No. Claude 3.5 Sonnet currently has 4 source-displayable rows across 416 tracked benchmark slots. The profile exposes published, non-generated evidence and leaves missing categories blank until an exact evaluation is available. Coverage describes how much was measured; it is not a penalty added to an individual benchmark result.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet has a reported context window of 200K in the exact-model catalog record. The value stays visible, but the profile marks its source link as unavailable instead of presenting it as directly documented. Maximum output length remains separate because providers often publish a different limit.
Related resources
Last updated September 2, 2026. Runtime fields remain blank until a sourced snapshot exists.
Get one weekly email when material rank, price, availability, or benchmark evidence changes are worth revisiting.
Read a sample issueJoin 2,000+ readers.