Model profile
Claude 4.1 Opus
Evidence coverage
4 of 321 tracked benchmarks are published. 2 are verified and 2 provisional. 4 of 8 categories are measured.
- Published / tracked
- 4 / 321
- Verified
- 2
- Provisional
- 2
- Categories with evidence
- 4 / 8
Evidence by category
- Agentic1 benchmarkVerified
- Coding1 benchmarkVerified
- Reasoning0 benchmarksNot measured
- Knowledge1 benchmarkReported
- Math0 benchmarksNot measured
- Multilingual0 benchmarksNot measured
- Multimodal1 benchmarkReported
- Inst. Following0 benchmarksNot measured
Claude 4.1 Opus ranks #142 out of 200 models on the public leaderboard with an overall score of 45.88/100. It also ranks #71 out of 99 on the verified leaderboard. While not a frontier model, it offers specific advantages depending on the use case.
Claude 4.1 Opus is a proprietary model with a 200K token context window. It processes queries without explicit chain-of-thought reasoning, offering faster response times and lower token usage.
Claude 4.1 Opus sits inside the Claude 4.1 Opus family alongside Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking. This profile currently has 4 of 321 tracked benchmarks. BenchLM only exposes non-generated benchmark rows publicly, so missing categories stay blank until a sourced evaluation is available.
Its strongest category is Agentic (#72), while its weakest is Coding (#85). This performance profile makes it particularly useful for coding agents, browser research, and computer-use workflows.
Peer position
Exact provisional scores and ranks for the closest listed peers. A score can appear before a model clears the evidence threshold for a rank, so equal scores can have different rank states.
Range 45.08–46.36
- GPT-5 nanoOpenAICompare#13946.36GPT-5 nano is #139 with a score of 46.36.
- Mistral Small 4MistralCompare#14046.23Mistral Small 4 is #140 with a score of 46.23.
- o1-proOpenAICompare#14145.94o1-pro is #141 with a score of 45.94.
- Claude 4.1 OpusCurrent modelAnthropic#14245.88Claude 4.1 Opus is #142 with a score of 45.88.
- Z-1ZCompare#14345.13Z-1 is #143 with a score of 45.13.
- Nemotron-4 15BNVIDIACompare#14445.08Nemotron-4 15B is #144 with a score of 45.08.
- Seed 1.6 FlashByteDanceCompare#14545.08Seed 1.6 Flash is #145 with a score of 45.08.
Category percentile
More
Relative position among models eligible for each sourced category. A higher percentile means a stronger position within that category's ranked cohort; 100 is highest.
- Agentic40%Eligible cohort rank #72 of 119Category score 45.7
- Coding31%Eligible cohort rank #85 of 122Category score 46.7
Category evidence
Scores and ranks appear only where this model has published benchmark evidence. Categories without displayable source records remain not measured.
| Category | Score | Rank | Percentile | Weight | Benchmarks | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AgenticRank #72 of 119Percentile 40thWeight 22%1 benchmarkVerified | 45.7 | #72 of 119 | 40th | 22% | 1 benchmark | Verified |
| CodingRank #85 of 122Percentile 31stWeight 20%1 benchmarkVerified | 46.7 | #85 of 122 | 31st | 20% | 1 benchmark | Verified |
| ReasoningWeight 17%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 17% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| KnowledgeRank Not rankedWeight 12%1 benchmarkReported | 46.1 | Not ranked | Not available | 12% | 1 benchmark | Reported |
| MathWeight 5%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 5% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| MultilingualWeight 7%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 7% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| MultimodalRank Not rankedWeight 12%1 benchmarkReported | 80.8 | Not ranked | Not available | 12% | 1 benchmark | Reported |
| Inst. FollowingWeight 5%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 5% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
Chatbot Arena performance
Scroll horizontally to inspect confidence intervals and vote counts.
| View | Elo | Confidence interval | Votes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Text Overall | 1253 | Not available | Not available |
Benchmark Details
Rows below have a displayable published verification record. Each source link and provenance note remains in the page HTML while its category is closed. Source-unverified manual rows and generated rows stay hidden.
Agentic1 benchmark
Coding1 benchmark
Software Engineering Benchmark Verified
Knowledge1 benchmark
Multimodal1 benchmark
Design Arena Website Elo
Frequently Asked Questions
How does Claude 4.1 Opus perform overall in AI benchmarks?
Claude 4.1 Opus has 4 published benchmark scores on BenchLM, but it does not yet have enough non-generated coverage to receive a global overall rank.
Is Claude 4.1 Opus good for knowledge and understanding?
Claude 4.1 Opus has visible benchmark coverage in knowledge and understanding, but BenchLM does not currently assign it a global category rank there.
Is Claude 4.1 Opus good for coding and programming?
Claude 4.1 Opus ranks #85 out of 122 models in coding and programming benchmarks with an average score of 46.7. There are stronger options in this category.
Is Claude 4.1 Opus good for agentic tool use and computer tasks?
Claude 4.1 Opus ranks #72 out of 119 models in agentic tool use and computer tasks benchmarks with an average score of 45.7. There are stronger options in this category.
Is Claude 4.1 Opus good for multimodal and grounded tasks?
Claude 4.1 Opus has visible benchmark coverage in multimodal and grounded tasks, but BenchLM does not currently assign it a global category rank there.
Which sibling models are related to Claude 4.1 Opus?
Claude 4.1 Opus belongs to the Claude 4.1 Opus family. Related variants on BenchLM include Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking.
Does Claude 4.1 Opus have full benchmark coverage on BenchLM?
Not yet. Claude 4.1 Opus currently has 4 published benchmark scores out of the 321 benchmarks BenchLM tracks. BenchLM only exposes non-generated public benchmark rows, so missing categories stay blank until a sourced evaluation is available.
What is the context window size of Claude 4.1 Opus?
Claude 4.1 Opus has a published context window of 200K, which determines how much text it can process in a single interaction.
Related Resources
Choose with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, new releases, pricing changes, and the evidence behind them.
Free. One email per week.