Skip to main content
BenchLM
Data

Data as of October 17, 2026 · How the score is built

EstablishedOpen WeightReasoning

Released Dec 1, 2025128K context

DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)

Decision readingDeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) is tracked, but not publicly ranked yet. The profile exposes 2 sourced benchmark rows and leaves unsupported fields blank until a published record exists.

Released Dec 1, 2025 — see all recent releases

Decision snapshot

Each value carries a field reference instead of floating alone. Markers compare this model with the current ranked and priced catalog; they are not absolute quality thresholds.

Capability

Unranked

field median 49.6Not eligible for a public rank

Price

$0.55input / $2.19 output

input median $0.75cached $0.14 · blended $1.37

Speed

Not measured

field median 92 tok/sTime to first token not measured

Context

128Ktokens

field median 256,000Reported for this model; direct source link not stored

Strongest published evidence

Coding ranks #95. Particularly well-suited for software development and code generation tasks.

Validate before choosing

2 published rows leave some tracked benchmark slots empty. Independent runtime speed has not been measured.

Source-linked · 2 displayable benchmark rows

Category score record

Scores and ranks appear only where published evidence can be displayed. The table keeps the score, weight, cohort, and evidence state together.

Category scores, ranks, weighting, benchmark coverage, and evidence status
CategoryScore
AgenticWeight 22%0 benchmarksNot measured
Not measured
CodingRank #95 of 150Percentile 37thWeight 20%1 benchmarkVerified
30.3
ReasoningWeight 17%0 benchmarksNot measured
Not measured
MultimodalWeight 12%0 benchmarksNot measured
Not measured
KnowledgeWeight 12%0 benchmarksNot measured
Not measured
MultilingualWeight 7%0 benchmarksNot measured
Not measured
Inst. FollowingWeight 5%0 benchmarksNot measured
Not measured
MathWeight 5%1 benchmarkVerified
Score pending

2 of 681 tracked benchmark slots have displayable evidence · bars run 0–100

Coverage details

How much of this is verified

Coverage is split by category so a strong number never hides a thin evidence base. Verified means the row is tied to a published source; provisional rows remain visible but separate.

  1. AgenticNot measured
  2. Coding1/1 verified
  3. ReasoningNot measured
  4. MultimodalNot measured
  5. KnowledgeNot measured
  6. MultilingualNot measured
  7. Inst. FollowingNot measured
  8. Math1/1 verified
Verified sourceProvisionalNot measured

Benchmark ledger

Coding opens by default. The marker compares each value with the best source-verified result in the catalog; provisional leaders do not set the reference. Expand the remaining categories for every published row.

Coding1 row
Coding benchmark values, best verified comparison, weight, and source status
Vibe Code BenchVibe Code Bench v1.1Score5.11%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Gemini 4 Argon · 91.90%

Gap86.8 behindWeightDisplay only
Math1 row
Math benchmark values, best verified comparison, weight, and source status
AIME 2025American Invitational Mathematics Examination 2025Score93.1%Versus best verified row

Best verified: GPT-5.2 · 100%

Gap6.9 behindWeightDisplay only

Bars run 0–100; the dark tick marks the best source-verified value

All 2 rows

Lineage

The sequence follows explicit supersedes links. Each score is estimated for that model; a relative can inform a sparse estimate but never sets a floor, so a newer release can score below an earlier one. Scores and prices remain blank when the corresponding public row or first-party rate is unavailable.

  1. Dec 1, 2025 · you are here

    DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)

    Not publicly ranked · $0.55 / $2.19

Spec sheet

Each documented value carries its source. Missing fields stay visible as not sourced or not published, rather than disappearing from the page.

API model ID
Not published
Context window
128K
Maximum output
Not sourced yet
Knowledge cutoff
Not sourced yet
Input modalities
Not sourced yet
Output modalities
Not sourced yet
Parameters
Not sourced yet
Availability
Not sourced yet
Cloud regions
Not tracked yet
Lifecycle
Established
API capabilities
Tool calling, structured outputs, and batch support are not tracked yet
Prompt caching
Published at $0.14 per million cached input tokens
Self-host
Open weights available; hardware estimate not sourced
Rate limits
Not tracked yet

How to read this profile

The visual layer above carries the decisions. These notes preserve the model, ranking, coverage, and family context behind the numbers.

We track DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking), but the public leaderboard excludes this profile until enough non-generated benchmark coverage is available. Only published rows appear above.

DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) is a open weight model with a 128K context window. It uses an explicit reasoning mode, which can improve complex problem solving while adding latency and token use.

DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) sits in the DeepSeek V3.2 family with DeepSeek V3.2. 2 of 681 tracked benchmark slots currently have displayable evidence. Missing categories stay blank.

Its strongest eligible category is Coding at #95. particularly well-suited for software development and code generation tasks.

Last updated October 17, 2026. Runtime fields remain blank until a sourced snapshot exists.

Deployment options

Self-host and provider-specific paths stay separate from benchmark evidence so operating constraints are visible before a score becomes the whole decision.

Published weights are available, but BenchLM does not yet have a sourced parameter and VRAM profile for this exact model. Hardware cost estimates stay unavailable until that sizing record is complete.

Estimate VRAM from known parameters

Questions

How does DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) perform overall in AI benchmarks?

DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) has 2 source-displayable benchmark rows, but it does not qualify for a public overall rank. The available rows remain visible by category without being converted into a site-wide score. Missing evidence stays blank instead of being estimated from an earlier model.

Is DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) good for coding and programming?

DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) ranks #95 out of 150 eligible models for coding and programming, with a public category score of 30.3/100. Higher-ranked alternatives are available for workloads where this category decides the choice. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.

Is DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) good for mathematics?

DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) has source-displayable benchmark coverage for mathematics, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.

Is DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) open source?

DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) is an open-weight model from DeepSeek. Its weights can be downloaded for local or hosted deployment, subject to the published license. Open weight does not automatically mean open source: training data and training code may remain private, and commercial restrictions can still apply.

Which sibling models are related to DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)?

DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) belongs to the DeepSeek V3.2 family. Related tracked variants include DeepSeek V3.2. A sibling link indicates shared lineage or a documented configuration relationship; it does not mean the variants have identical pricing, context limits, benchmark evidence, or deployment behavior. Compare before switching.

Does DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) have full benchmark coverage on BenchLM?

No. DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) currently has 3 source-displayable rows across 681 tracked benchmark slots. The profile exposes published, non-generated evidence and leaves missing categories blank until an exact evaluation is available. Coverage describes how much was measured; it is not a penalty added to an individual benchmark result.

What is the context window size of DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)?

DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) has a reported context window of 128K in the exact-model catalog record. The value stays visible, but the profile marks its source link as unavailable instead of presenting it as directly documented. Maximum output length remains separate because providers often publish a different limit.

Watch DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) in the weekly brief

Get one weekly email when material rank, price, availability, or benchmark evidence changes are worth revisiting.

Read a sample issue

Join 5,600+ readers.

Compare DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) with every tracked model953 comparisons