Capability
39/100
field median 56.3
#181 of 231 ranked models
TrackedOpen WeightReasoning128K context
Exaone 4.0 32B
Decision reading
Exaone 4.0 32B scores 39 out of 100 and ranks #181 of 231. This profile shows 2 source-displayable benchmark rows; its strongest eligible category is Knowledge at #156. No comparable first-party API price is published in the catalog.
Data as of September 21, 2026 · How the score is built
Exaone 4.0 32B will be repriced, updated or retired. Get each notice with its source and date. Follow model changes
Share or export
Strongest published evidence
Knowledge ranks #156. Particularly effective for knowledge-intensive tasks like research, analysis, and factual Q&A.
Validate before choosing
2 published rows leave some tracked benchmark slots empty. No comparable first-party API token rate is published.
Decision snapshot
Each value carries a field reference instead of floating alone. Markers compare this model with the current ranked and priced catalog; they are not absolute quality thresholds.
Price
Not listed
input median $1
No comparable first-party hosted token rate
Speed
Not measured
field median 97 tok/s
Time to first token not measured
Context
128Ktokens
field median 256,000
Reported for this model; direct source link not stored
How much of this is verified
Coverage is split by category so a strong number never hides a thin evidence base. Verified means the row is tied to a published source; provisional rows remain visible but separate.
- AgenticNot measured
- CodingNot measured
- ReasoningNot measured
- MultimodalNot measured
- Knowledge1/1 verified
- MultilingualNot measured
- Inst. FollowingNot measured
- Math1/1 verified
Verified sourceProvisionalNot measured
Category score record
Scores and ranks appear only where published evidence can be displayed. The table keeps the score, weight, cohort, and evidence state together.
| Category | Score | Rank | Percentile | Weight | Benchmarks | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AgenticWeight 22%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 22% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| CodingWeight 20%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 20% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| ReasoningWeight 17%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 17% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| MultimodalWeight 12%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 12% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| KnowledgeRank #156 of 186Percentile 16thWeight 12%1 benchmarkVerified | 36.5 | #156 of 186 | 16th | 12% | 1 benchmark | Verified |
| MultilingualWeight 7%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 7% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| Inst. FollowingWeight 5%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 5% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| MathWeight 5%1 benchmarkVerified | Score pending | Not ranked | Not available | 5% | 1 benchmark | Verified |
Benchmark ledger
Knowledge opens by default. The marker compares each value with the best source-verified result in the catalog; provisional leaders do not set the reference. Expand the remaining categories for every published row.
Knowledge1 row
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU-ProMassive Multitask Language Understanding Professional | Score81.8% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Qwen3.7 Max · 89.6% | Gap7.8 behind | WeightWeighted 20% | Provider exact |
Math1 row
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AIME 2025American Invitational Mathematics Examination 2025 | Score85.3% | Versus best verified row Best verified: MAI-Thinking-1 · 97% | Gap11.7 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
Capability shape
Each axis shows percentile within that category’s eligible cohort. The comparison outline is the median of the six nearest public-score peers; a collapsed vertex means the category is not rank-eligible.
Exaone 4.0 32B category percentile values
- AgenticNot eligible
- CodingNot eligible
- ReasoningNot eligible
- MultimodalNot eligible
- Knowledge16th percentile
- MultilingualNot eligible
- Instruction followingNot eligible
- MathNot eligible
The dashed outline is median of 6 nearest peers.
Eligible category ranks
- AgenticNot ranked
- CodingNot ranked
- ReasoningNot ranked
- MultimodalNot ranked
- Knowledge#156/186
- MultilingualNot ranked
- Inst. FollowingNot ranked
- MathNot ranked
Top decileTop quartileMid-fieldNot eligible
Spec sheet
Each documented value carries its source. Missing fields stay visible as not sourced or not published, rather than disappearing from the page.
- API model ID
- Not published
- Context window
- 128K
- Maximum output
- Not sourced yet
- Knowledge cutoff
- Not sourced yet
- Input modalities
- Not sourced yet
- Output modalities
- Not sourced yet
- Parameters
- Not sourced yet
- Availability
- Not sourced yet
- Cloud regions
- Not tracked yet
- Lifecycle
- Tracked
- API capabilities
- Tool calling, structured outputs, and batch support are not tracked yet
- Prompt caching
- Not documented in the pricing record
- Self-host
- Open weights available; hardware estimate not sourced
- Rate limits
- Not tracked yet
Deployment options
Self-host and provider-specific paths stay separate from benchmark evidence so operating constraints are visible before a score becomes the whole decision.
Published weights are available, but BenchLM does not yet have a sourced parameter and VRAM profile for this exact model. Hardware cost estimates stay unavailable until that sizing record is complete.
Estimate VRAM from known parametersLineage
The sequence follows explicit supersedes links. A successor's displayed score stays at least 0.1 points above its predecessor; raw benchmark rows do not move. Scores and prices remain blank when the corresponding public row or first-party rate is unavailable.
Release date not sourced · you are here
Exaone 4.0 32BScore 39.0 · Price not listed
32b
How to read this profile
The visual layer above carries the decisions. These notes preserve the model, ranking, coverage, and family context behind the numbers.
We track Exaone 4.0 32B as a regional Korea model. Its rows remain available for direct inspection, but the global leaderboard excludes them so local-market scores do not distort worldwide ranks.
Exaone 4.0 32B is a open weight model with a 128K context window. It uses an explicit reasoning mode, which can improve complex problem solving while adding latency and token use.
Exaone 4.0 32B sits in the Exaone 4.0 family with Exaone 4.0 1.2B. 2 of 447 tracked benchmark slots currently have displayable evidence. Missing categories stay blank.
Its strongest eligible category is Knowledge at #156. particularly effective for knowledge-intensive tasks like research, analysis, and factual Q&A.
Questions
How does Exaone 4.0 32B perform overall in AI benchmarks?
Exaone 4.0 32B is tracked as a regional Korea model. Its published regional benchmark rows remain visible, but the global overall table excludes them so a market-specific result does not alter worldwide positions. Use the matching regional leaderboard when comparing it with locally evaluated models.
Is Exaone 4.0 32B good for knowledge and understanding?
Exaone 4.0 32B ranks #156 out of 186 eligible models for knowledge and understanding, with a public category score of 36.5/100. Higher-ranked alternatives are available for workloads where this category decides the choice. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.
Is Exaone 4.0 32B good for mathematics?
Exaone 4.0 32B has source-displayable benchmark coverage for mathematics, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.
Is Exaone 4.0 32B open source?
Exaone 4.0 32B is an open-weight model from LG AI Research. Its weights can be downloaded for local or hosted deployment, subject to the published license. Open weight does not automatically mean open source: training data and training code may remain private, and commercial restrictions can still apply.
Which sibling models are related to Exaone 4.0 32B?
Exaone 4.0 32B belongs to the Exaone 4.0 family. Related tracked variants include Exaone 4.0 1.2B. A sibling link indicates shared lineage or a documented configuration relationship; it does not mean the variants have identical pricing, context limits, benchmark evidence, or deployment behavior. Compare before switching.
Does Exaone 4.0 32B have full benchmark coverage on BenchLM?
No. Exaone 4.0 32B currently has 11 source-displayable rows across 447 tracked benchmark slots. The profile exposes published, non-generated evidence and leaves missing categories blank until an exact evaluation is available. Coverage describes how much was measured; it is not a penalty added to an individual benchmark result.
What is the context window size of Exaone 4.0 32B?
Exaone 4.0 32B has a reported context window of 128K in the exact-model catalog record. The value stays visible, but the profile marks its source link as unavailable instead of presenting it as directly documented. Maximum output length remains separate because providers often publish a different limit.
Compare Exaone 4.0 32B with every tracked model496 comparisons
Last updated September 21, 2026. Runtime fields remain blank until a sourced snapshot exists.
Watch Exaone 4.0 32B in the weekly brief
Get one weekly email when material rank, price, availability, or benchmark evidence changes are worth revisiting.
Read a sample issueJoin 2,000+ readers.