Capability
56.9/100
field median 59.1
#98 of 230 ranked models
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Released March 2025 — see all recent releases
Decision reading
Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 56.9 out of 100 and ranks #98 of 230. This profile shows 7 source-displayable benchmark rows; its strongest eligible category is Agentic at #77. API pricing is $1.25 input and $10 output per million tokens, with cached input at $0.125.
Data as of September 2, 2026 · How the score is built
Strongest published evidence
Agentic ranks #77. Particularly useful for coding agents, browser research, and computer-use workflows.
Validate before choosing
7 published rows leave some tracked benchmark slots empty. Coding is its lowest eligible category at #138.
Decision snapshot
Each value carries a field reference instead of floating alone. Markers compare this model with the current ranked and priced catalog; they are not absolute quality thresholds.
Price
$1.25input / $10 output
input median $1
cached $0.13 · batch + cache $0.13 · blended $5.63
Speed
123tok/s
field median 90 tok/s
First token 24.06 s
Context
1Mtokens
field median 256,000
Maximum output length is tracked separately
Capability shape
Each axis shows percentile within that category’s eligible cohort. The comparison outline is the median of the six nearest public-score peers; a collapsed vertex means the category is not rank-eligible.
Gemini 2.5 Pro category percentile values
- Agentic46th percentile
- Coding7th percentile
- ReasoningNot eligible
- KnowledgeNot eligible
- MathNot eligible
- MultilingualNot eligible
- MultimodalNot eligible
- Instruction followingNot eligible
The dashed outline is median of 6 nearest peers.
Eligible category ranks
- Agentic#77/143
- Coding#138/148
- ReasoningNot ranked
- KnowledgeNot ranked
- MathNot ranked
- MultilingualNot ranked
- MultimodalNot ranked
- Inst. FollowingNot ranked
Top decileTop quartileMid-fieldNot eligible
What it costs to get this score
Published API price against the public score. The x-axis uses a log scale; the dashed path marks models that are not beaten by a cheaper, higher-scoring option. Price uses average of published input and output rates.
The chart opens on the current model. Scroll horizontally to inspect the full price axis.
Current modelGemini 2.5 Pro · 56.9 score · $5.63 blended per million tokens
Horizontal: blended price per million tokens, log scale · Vertical: public score
How much of this is verified
Coverage is split by category so a strong number never hides a thin evidence base. Verified means the row is tied to a published source; provisional rows remain visible but separate.
- Agentic1/1 verified
- Coding2/2 verified
- ReasoningNot measured
- Knowledge1/2 verified
- Math2/2 verified
- MultilingualNot measured
- MultimodalNot measured
- Inst. FollowingNot measured
Verified sourceProvisionalNot measured
Spec sheet
Each documented value carries its source. Missing fields stay visible as not sourced or not published, rather than disappearing from the page.
- API model ID
- gemini-2.5-proGoogle Gemini API pricing
- Context window
- 1MGoogle Gemini API pricing
- Maximum output
- Not sourced yet
- Knowledge cutoff
- Not sourced yet
- Input modalities
- Not sourced yet
- Output modalities
- Not sourced yet
- Parameters
- Not disclosed by the provider
- Availability
- Not sourced yet
- Cloud regions
- Not tracked yet
- Lifecycle
- Established
- API capabilities
- Tool calling, structured outputs, and batch support are not tracked yet
- Prompt caching
- Published at $0.13 per million cached input tokensGoogle Gemini API pricing
- Self-host
- Weights are not published
- Rate limits
- Not tracked yet
Category score record
Scores and ranks appear only where published evidence can be displayed. The table keeps the score, weight, cohort, and evidence state together.
| Category | Score | Rank | Percentile | Weight | Benchmarks | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AgenticRank #77 of 143Percentile 46thWeight 22%1 benchmarkVerified | 48.2 | #77 of 143 | 46th | 22% | 1 benchmark | Verified |
| CodingRank #138 of 148Percentile 7thWeight 20%2 benchmarksVerified | 35.6 | #138 of 148 | 7th | 20% | 2 benchmarks | Verified |
| ReasoningWeight 17%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 17% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| KnowledgeRank Not rankedWeight 12%2 benchmarksMixed sources | 21.7 | Not ranked | Not available | 12% | 2 benchmarks | Mixed sources |
| MathRank Not rankedWeight 5%2 benchmarksVerified | 35.4 | Not ranked | Not available | 5% | 2 benchmarks | Verified |
| MultilingualWeight 7%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 7% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| MultimodalWeight 12%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 12% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| Inst. FollowingWeight 5%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 5% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
Benchmark ledger
Coding opens by default. The marker compares each value with the best source-verified result in the catalog; provisional leaders do not set the reference. Expand the remaining categories for every published row.
Coding2 rows
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench VerifiedSoftware Engineering Benchmark Verified | Score63.8% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Claude Opus 5 · 96% | Gap32.2 behind | WeightWeighted 16% | Provider exact |
| Vibe Code BenchVibe Code Bench v1.1 | Score0.40% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Claude Opus 4.7 · 71.00% | Gap70.6 behind | WeightDisplay only | Benchmark exact |
Agentic1 row
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gert LabsGert Labs Composite Game Benchmark | Score42.01% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Claude Opus 4.8 · 72.97% | Gap31 behind | WeightDisplay only | Benchmark exact |
Knowledge2 rows
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HLEHumanity's Last Exam | Score18.8% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Claude Fable 5.1 · 65% | Gap46.2 behind | WeightWeighted 45% | Provider exact |
| GPQAGraduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A | Score83% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Sakana Fugu-Ultra · 95.5% | Gap12.5 behind | WeightWeighted 7% | Reported |
Math2 rows
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)FrontierMath v2 Tiers 1-3 | Score14.138% | Versus best verified row Best verified: GPT-5.6 Sol · 89.000% | Gap74.9 behind | WeightWeighted 30% | Benchmark exact |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)FrontierMath v2 Tier 4 | Score4.167% | Versus best verified row Best verified: GPT-5.6 Sol · 83.000% | Gap78.8 behind | WeightWeighted 10% | Benchmark exact |
Published price history
This chart appears only when at least two dated first-party price records exist for the exact model. It shows rate changes, not an inferred cost trend.
3 dated first-party price records. The newest record lists $10 per million tokens.
Lineage
The sequence follows explicit supersedes links. A successor's displayed score stays at least 0.1 points above its predecessor; raw benchmark rows do not move. Scores and prices remain blank when the corresponding public row or first-party rate is unavailable.
March 2025 · you are here
Gemini 2.5 ProScore 56.9 · $1.25 / $10
Base entry
How to read this profile
The visual layer above carries the decisions. These notes preserve the model, ranking, coverage, and family context behind the numbers.
Gemini 2.5 Pro ranks #98 of 230 on the public leaderboard with a score of 56.94/100. Its source-verified position is #50 of 105.
Gemini 2.5 Pro is a proprietary model with a 1M context window. No explicit reasoning mode is documented in this profile.
7 of 416 tracked benchmark slots currently have displayable evidence. Missing categories stay blank.
Its strongest eligible category is Agentic at #77, while its lowest eligible position is Coding at #138. particularly useful for coding agents, browser research, and computer-use workflows.
Radar
Full release historyGemini 2.5 Pro release history
Gemini 2.5 Pro released
Google · Model release
Source confirmed
Radar confirmed these at the source. Already tracking Gemini 2.5 Pro? See the free Radar Brief for what changes next.
Frequently asked questions
How does Gemini 2.5 Pro perform overall in AI benchmarks?
Gemini 2.5 Pro ranks #98 out of 230 models on the public BenchAlign leaderboard, with a score of 56.94/100. Its evidence status is Supported, and this profile shows 7 source-displayable benchmark rows. The label describes evidence depth, not a provider quality claim; inspect category rows before choosing a workload.
Is Gemini 2.5 Pro good for knowledge and understanding?
Gemini 2.5 Pro has source-displayable benchmark coverage for knowledge and understanding, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.
Is Gemini 2.5 Pro good for coding and programming?
Gemini 2.5 Pro ranks #138 out of 148 eligible models for coding and programming, with a public category score of 35.6/100. Higher-ranked alternatives are available for workloads where this category decides the choice. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.
Is Gemini 2.5 Pro good for mathematics?
Gemini 2.5 Pro has source-displayable benchmark coverage for mathematics, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.
Is Gemini 2.5 Pro good for agentic tool use and computer tasks?
Gemini 2.5 Pro ranks #77 out of 143 eligible models for agentic tool use and computer tasks, with a public category score of 48.2/100. Higher-ranked alternatives are available for workloads where this category decides the choice. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.
Does Gemini 2.5 Pro have full benchmark coverage on BenchLM?
No. Gemini 2.5 Pro currently has 24 source-displayable rows across 416 tracked benchmark slots. The profile exposes published, non-generated evidence and leaves missing categories blank until an exact evaluation is available. Coverage describes how much was measured; it is not a penalty added to an individual benchmark result.
What is the context window size of Gemini 2.5 Pro?
Gemini 2.5 Pro has a documented context window of 1M. That figure is the maximum combined prompt and retained-conversation space reported for this exact model; it is not the maximum output length. The profile keeps output limits separate because providers often publish those limits independently.
Compare Gemini 2.5 Pro with every tracked model409 comparisons
Last updated September 2, 2026. Runtime fields remain blank until a sourced snapshot exists.
Watch Gemini 2.5 Pro in the weekly brief
Get one weekly email when material rank, price, availability, or benchmark evidence changes are worth revisiting.
Read a sample issueJoin 2,000+ readers.