Model profile
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Evidence coverage
24 of 321 tracked benchmarks are published. 6 are verified and 18 provisional. 7 of 8 categories are measured.
- Published / tracked
- 24 / 321
- Verified
- 6
- Provisional
- 18
- Categories with evidence
- 7 / 8
Evidence by category
- Agentic5 benchmarksMixed evidence
- Coding4 benchmarksMixed evidence
- Reasoning2 benchmarksReported
- Knowledge8 benchmarksMixed evidence
- Math2 benchmarksVerified
- Multilingual0 benchmarksNot measured
- Multimodal2 benchmarksReported
- Inst. Following1 benchmarkReported
Gemini 2.5 Pro ranks #70 out of 200 models on the public leaderboard with an overall score of 57.25/100. It also ranks #45 out of 99 on the verified leaderboard. While not a frontier model, it offers specific advantages depending on the use case.
Gemini 2.5 Pro is a proprietary model with a 1M token context window. It processes queries without explicit chain-of-thought reasoning, offering faster response times and lower token usage.
This profile currently has 24 of 321 tracked benchmarks. BenchLM only exposes non-generated benchmark rows publicly, so missing categories stay blank until a sourced evaluation is available.
Its strongest category is Agentic (#60), while its weakest is Coding (#111). This performance profile makes it particularly useful for coding agents, browser research, and computer-use workflows.
Peer position
Exact provisional scores and ranks for the closest listed peers. A score can appear before a model clears the evidence threshold for a rank, so equal scores can have different rank states.
Range 56.79–57.56
- GLM-4.5Z.AICompare#6857.56GLM-4.5 is #68 with a score of 57.56.
- Claude Opus 4.5 ThinkingAnthropicCompare#6957.44Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking is #69 with a score of 57.44.
- Gemini 2.5 ProCurrent modelGoogle#7057.25Gemini 2.5 Pro is #70 with a score of 57.25.
- Qwen3.5 397BAlibabaCompare#7157.01Qwen3.5 397B is #71 with a score of 57.01.
- Qwen3.5-35B-A3BAlibabaCompare#7256.97Qwen3.5-35B-A3B is #72 with a score of 56.97.
- GPT-5.3-Codex-SparkOpenAICompare#7356.91GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark is #73 with a score of 56.91.
- Kimi K2.6Moonshot AICompare#7456.79Kimi K2.6 is #74 with a score of 56.79.
Category percentile
More
Relative position among models eligible for each sourced category. A higher percentile means a stronger position within that category's ranked cohort; 100 is highest.
- Agentic50%Eligible cohort rank #60 of 119Category score 48.1
- Coding9%Eligible cohort rank #111 of 122Category score 35.7
Category evidence
Scores and ranks appear only where this model has published benchmark evidence. Categories without displayable source records remain not measured.
| Category | Score | Rank | Percentile | Weight | Benchmarks | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AgenticRank #60 of 119Percentile 50thWeight 22%5 benchmarksMixed sources | 48.1 | #60 of 119 | 50th | 22% | 5 benchmarks | Mixed sources |
| CodingRank #111 of 122Percentile 9thWeight 20%4 benchmarksMixed sources | 35.7 | #111 of 122 | 9th | 20% | 4 benchmarks | Mixed sources |
| ReasoningRank Not rankedWeight 17%2 benchmarksReported | 57.6 | Not ranked | Not available | 17% | 2 benchmarks | Reported |
| KnowledgeRank Not rankedWeight 12%8 benchmarksMixed sources | 23.8 | Not ranked | Not available | 12% | 8 benchmarks | Mixed sources |
| MathRank Not rankedWeight 5%2 benchmarksVerified | 35.5 | Not ranked | Not available | 5% | 2 benchmarks | Verified |
| MultilingualWeight 7%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 7% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| MultimodalRank Not rankedWeight 12%2 benchmarksReported | 85.2 | Not ranked | Not available | 12% | 2 benchmarks | Reported |
| Inst. FollowingRank Not rankedWeight 5%1 benchmarkReported | 83.0 | Not ranked | Not available | 5% | 1 benchmark | Reported |
Chatbot Arena performance
Scroll horizontally to inspect confidence intervals and vote counts.
| View | Elo | Confidence interval | Votes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Text Overall | 1446 | ±2.5 | 124,422 |
| Coding | 1465 | ±4.3 | 26,537 |
| Math | 1441 | ±7.0 | 7,635 |
| Instruction Following | 1439 | ±3.9 | 34,227 |
| Creative Writing | 1444 | ±5.2 | 17,398 |
| Multi-turn | 1448 | ±4.8 | 21,182 |
| Hard Prompts | 1458 | ±3.2 | 64,580 |
| Hard Prompts (English) | 1457 | ±4.0 | 32,429 |
| Longer Query | 1456 | ±4.1 | 32,550 |
Benchmark Details
Rows below have a displayable published verification record. Each source link and provenance note remains in the page HTML while its category is closed. Source-unverified manual rows and generated rows stay hidden.
Agentic5 benchmarks
Artificial Analysis Agentic Index
τ²-Bench Tool-Agent-User Evaluation
Gert Labs Composite Game Benchmark
GDPval-AA normalized
Coding4 benchmarks
Software Engineering Benchmark Verified
Vibe Code Bench v1.1
Artificial Analysis Coding Index
Artificial Analysis SciCode
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Artificial Analysis Long Context Reasoning
Critical Physics Tasks
Knowledge8 benchmarks
Humanity's Last Exam
Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A
Artificial Analysis GPQA Diamond
Artificial Analysis Humanity's Last Exam
Artificial Analysis Omniscience Index
Artificial Analysis Omniscience Accuracy
Artificial Analysis Omniscience Hallucination Rate
Math2 benchmarks
FrontierMath v2 Tiers 1-3
FrontierMath v2 Tier 4
Multimodal2 benchmarks
Artificial Analysis MMMU-Pro
Design Arena Website Elo
Inst. Following1 benchmark
Artificial Analysis IFBench
Frequently Asked Questions
How does Gemini 2.5 Pro perform overall in AI benchmarks?
Gemini 2.5 Pro has 24 published benchmark scores on BenchLM, but it does not yet have enough non-generated coverage to receive a global overall rank.
Is Gemini 2.5 Pro good for knowledge and understanding?
Gemini 2.5 Pro has visible benchmark coverage in knowledge and understanding, but BenchLM does not currently assign it a global category rank there.
Is Gemini 2.5 Pro good for coding and programming?
Gemini 2.5 Pro ranks #111 out of 122 models in coding and programming benchmarks with an average score of 35.7. There are stronger options in this category.
Is Gemini 2.5 Pro good for mathematics?
Gemini 2.5 Pro has visible benchmark coverage in mathematics, but BenchLM does not currently assign it a global category rank there.
Is Gemini 2.5 Pro good for reasoning and logic?
Gemini 2.5 Pro has visible benchmark coverage in reasoning and logic, but BenchLM does not currently assign it a global category rank there.
Is Gemini 2.5 Pro good for agentic tool use and computer tasks?
Gemini 2.5 Pro ranks #60 out of 119 models in agentic tool use and computer tasks benchmarks with an average score of 48.1. There are stronger options in this category.
Is Gemini 2.5 Pro good for multimodal and grounded tasks?
Gemini 2.5 Pro has visible benchmark coverage in multimodal and grounded tasks, but BenchLM does not currently assign it a global category rank there.
Is Gemini 2.5 Pro good for instruction following?
Gemini 2.5 Pro has visible benchmark coverage in instruction following, but BenchLM does not currently assign it a global category rank there.
Does Gemini 2.5 Pro have full benchmark coverage on BenchLM?
Not yet. Gemini 2.5 Pro currently has 24 published benchmark scores out of the 321 benchmarks BenchLM tracks. BenchLM only exposes non-generated public benchmark rows, so missing categories stay blank until a sourced evaluation is available.
What is the context window size of Gemini 2.5 Pro?
Gemini 2.5 Pro has a published context window of 1M, which determines how much text it can process in a single interaction.
Related Resources
Choose with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, new releases, pricing changes, and the evidence behind them.
Free. One email per week.