Data as of October 17, 2026 · How the score is built
Released Nov 18, 20252M context
Gemini 3 Pro
Decision readingGemini 3 Pro scores 61.2 out of 100 and ranks #52 of 224. This profile shows 27 source-displayable benchmark rows; its strongest eligible category is Multimodal & Grounded at #18. API pricing is $2 input and $12 output per million tokens.
Released Nov 18, 2025 — see all recent releases
Decision snapshot
Each value carries a field reference instead of floating alone. Markers compare this model with the current ranked and priced catalog; they are not absolute quality thresholds.
Capability
61.2/100
field median 49.6#52 of 224 ranked models
Public
#52of 224
Verified #34 of 88
Price
$2input / $12 output
input median $0.75blended $7
Speed
109tok/s
field median 92 tok/sFirst token 32.65 s
Context
2Mtokens
field median 256,000Reported for this model; direct source link not stored
Strongest published evidence
Multimodal & Grounded ranks #18. Particularly strong for screenshots, documents, charts, and grounded multimodal workflows.
Validate before choosing
27 published rows leave some tracked benchmark slots empty. Coding is its lowest eligible category at #59.
Source-linked · 27 displayable benchmark rows
Category score record
Scores and ranks appear only where published evidence can be displayed. The table keeps the score, weight, cohort, and evidence state together.
| Category | Score | Rank | Percentile | Weight | Benchmarks | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AgenticWeight 22%2 benchmarksVerified | Score pending | 2 benchmarks | Verified | |||
| CodingRank #59 of 150Percentile 61stWeight 20%1 benchmarkVerified | 43.0 | 1 benchmark | Verified | |||
| ReasoningRank Not rankedWeight 17%2 benchmarksVerified | 50.1 | 2 benchmarks | Verified | |||
| MultimodalRank #18 of 54Percentile 68thWeight 12%22 benchmarksMixed sources | 80.0 | 22 benchmarks | Mixed sources | |||
| KnowledgeWeight 12%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | 0 benchmarks | Not measured | |||
| MultilingualWeight 7%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | 0 benchmarks | Not measured | |||
| Inst. FollowingWeight 5%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | 0 benchmarks | Not measured | |||
| MathWeight 5%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
27 of 681 tracked benchmark slots have displayable evidence · bars run 0–100
Coverage detailsHow much of this is verified
Coverage is split by category so a strong number never hides a thin evidence base. Verified means the row is tied to a published source; provisional rows remain visible but separate.
- Agentic2/2 verified
- Coding1/1 verified
- Reasoning2/2 verified
- Multimodal3/22 verified
- KnowledgeNot measured
- MultilingualNot measured
- Inst. FollowingNot measured
- MathNot measured
Capability shape
Each axis shows percentile within that category’s eligible cohort. The comparison outline is the median of the six nearest public-score peers; a collapsed vertex means the category is not rank-eligible.
Gemini 3 Pro category percentile values
- AgenticNot eligible
- Coding61st percentile
- ReasoningNot eligible
- Multimodal68th percentile
- KnowledgeNot eligible
- MultilingualNot eligible
- Instruction followingNot eligible
- MathNot eligible
The dashed outline is median of 6 nearest peers.
Eligible category ranks
- AgenticNot ranked
- Coding#59/150
- ReasoningNot ranked
- Multimodal#18/54
- KnowledgeNot ranked
- MultilingualNot ranked
- Inst. FollowingNot ranked
- MathNot ranked
Benchmark ledger
Coding opens by default. The marker compares each value with the best source-verified result in the catalog; provisional leaders do not set the reference. Expand the remaining categories for every published row.
Coding1 row
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vibe Code BenchVibe Code Bench v1.1 | Score14.30% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Gemini 4 Argon · 91.90% | Gap77.6 behind | WeightDisplay only | Benchmark exact |
Agentic2 rows
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JobBench | Score11.4% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Muse Wonder Full · 75.3% | Gap63.9 behind | Weight6% ref. weight | Benchmark exact |
| Gert LabsGert Labs Composite Game Benchmark | Score63.23% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Claude Opus 4.8 · 72.97% | Gap9.7 behind | WeightDisplay only | Benchmark exact |
Reasoning2 rows
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus for AGI v2 | Score31.1% | Versus best verified row Best verified: GPT-6 Astra · 95% | Gap63.9 behind | WeightWeighted 25% | Provider exact |
| ARC-AGI-1ARC-AGI-1 Semi-Private Evaluation | Score75.00% | Versus best verified row Best verified: GPT-6 Astra · 98.50% | Gap23.5 behind | WeightDisplay only | Benchmark exact |
Multimodal22 rows
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMMU-ProMassive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding Pro | Score81% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Gemini 3.5 Flash · 83.6% | Gap2.6 behind | WeightWeighted 40% | Provider exact |
| CharXivCharXiv Reasoning | Score81.4% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Qwen3.8 Max · 93.5% | Gap12.1 behind | WeightWeighted 20% | Secondary exact |
| MMMUMassive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding | Score87.2% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Qwen3.5 397B · 85.0% | Gap2.2 behind | WeightDisplay only | Secondary exact |
| RealWorldQA | Score83.3% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Qwen3.8-Flash-Next · 88.5% | Gap5.2 behind | WeightDisplay only | Secondary exact |
| OmniDocBench 1.5 | Score88.5% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Qwen3.8 Max · 92.1% | Gap3.6 behind | WeightDisplay only | Secondary exact |
| Video-MME (with subtitle)Video-MME with subtitle | Score88.4% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Qwen3.8 Max · 90.4% | Gap2 behind | WeightDisplay only | Secondary exact |
| Video-MME (w/o subtitle)Video-MME without subtitle | Score87.7% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Qwen3.5 397B · 83.7% | Gap4 behind | WeightDisplay only | Secondary exact |
| MathVision | Score86.6% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Qwen3.8 Max · 95.2% | Gap8.6 behind | WeightDisplay only | Secondary exact |
| We-Math | Score86.9% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Qwen3.5 397B · 87.9% | Gap1 behind | WeightDisplay only | Secondary exact |
| DynaMath | Score85.1% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Qwen3.5 397B · 86.3% | Gap1.2 behind | WeightDisplay only | Secondary exact |
| SimpleVQA | Score73.2% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Qwen3.7 Plus · 81.7% | Gap8.5 behind | WeightDisplay only | Secondary exact |
| MMLongBench-Doc | Score60.5% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B · 62.8% | Gap2.3 behind | WeightDisplay only | Secondary exact |
| CC-OCR | Score79.0% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Qwen3.5 397B · 82.0% | Gap3 behind | WeightDisplay only | Secondary exact |
| AI2D_TESTAI2D test split | Score94.1% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Qwen3.5 397B · 93.9% | Gap0.2 behind | WeightDisplay only | Secondary exact |
| CountBench | Score97.3% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Qwen3.6-27B · 97.8% | Gap0.5 behind | WeightDisplay only | Secondary exact |
| RefCOCO (avg)RefCOCO average | Score84.1% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Qwen3.6-27B · 92.5% | Gap8.4 behind | WeightDisplay only | Secondary exact |
| ODINW13 | Score46.3% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Qwen3.7 Plus · 51.1% | Gap4.8 behind | WeightDisplay only | Secondary exact |
| ERQA | Score70.5% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Qwen3.8 Max · 77.8% | Gap7.3 behind | WeightDisplay only | Secondary exact |
| VideoMMMU | Score87.6% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Qwen3.8 Max · 88.7% | Gap1.1 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
| MLVU (M-Avg)MLVU mean average | Score83.0% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Qwen3.8 Max · 90.8% | Gap7.8 behind | WeightDisplay only | Secondary exact |
| ScreenSpot Pro | Score72.7% | Versus best verified row Best verified: GPT-6 Astra · 92.7% | Gap20 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
| V* | Score88.0% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Qwen3.6 Plus · 96.9% | Gap8.9 behind | WeightDisplay only | Secondary exact |
Bars run 0–100; the dark tick marks the best source-verified value
All 27 rowsWhat it costs to get this score
Published API price against the public score. The x-axis uses a log scale; the dashed path marks models that are not beaten by a cheaper, higher-scoring option. Price uses average of published input and output rates.
Gemini 3 Pro · 61.2 score · $7 blended per million tokens
The chart opens on the current model. Scroll horizontally to inspect the full price axis.
Horizontal: blended price per million tokens, log scale · Vertical: public score
Lineage
The sequence follows explicit supersedes links. Each score is estimated for that model; a relative can inform a sparse estimate but never sets a floor, so a newer release can score below an earlier one. Scores and prices remain blank when the corresponding public row or first-party rate is unavailable.
Base entry
Gemini 3 Pro Deep ThinkSpec sheet
Each documented value carries its source. Missing fields stay visible as not sourced or not published, rather than disappearing from the page.
- API model ID
- Not published
- Context window
- 2M
- Maximum output
- Not sourced yet
- Knowledge cutoff
- Not sourced yet
- Input modalities
- Not sourced yet
- Output modalities
- Not sourced yet
- Parameters
- Not disclosed by the provider
- Availability
- Not sourced yet
- Cloud regions
- Not tracked yet
- Lifecycle
- Established
- API capabilities
- Tool calling, structured outputs, and batch support are not tracked yet
- Prompt caching
- Not documented in the pricing record
- Self-host
- Weights are not published
- Rate limits
- Not tracked yet
How to read this profile
The visual layer above carries the decisions. These notes preserve the model, ranking, coverage, and family context behind the numbers.
Gemini 3 Pro ranks #52 of 224 on the public leaderboard with a score of 61.18/100. Its source-verified position is #34 of 88.
Gemini 3 Pro is a proprietary model with a 2M context window. No explicit reasoning mode is documented in this profile.
Gemini 3 Pro sits in the Gemini 3 Pro family with Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think. 27 of 681 tracked benchmark slots currently have displayable evidence. Missing categories stay blank.
Its strongest eligible category is Multimodal & Grounded at #18, while its lowest eligible position is Coding at #59. particularly strong for screenshots, documents, charts, and grounded multimodal workflows.
Last updated October 17, 2026. Runtime fields remain blank until a sourced snapshot exists.
Questions
How does Gemini 3 Pro perform overall in AI benchmarks?
Gemini 3 Pro ranks #52 out of 224 models on the public BenchAlign leaderboard, with a score of 61.18/100. Its evidence status is Supported, and this profile shows 27 source-displayable benchmark rows. The label describes evidence depth, not a provider quality claim; inspect category rows before choosing a workload.
Is Gemini 3 Pro good for coding and programming?
Gemini 3 Pro ranks #59 out of 150 eligible models for coding and programming, with a public category score of 43/100. Higher-ranked alternatives are available for workloads where this category decides the choice. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.
Is Gemini 3 Pro good for reasoning and logic?
Gemini 3 Pro has source-displayable benchmark coverage for reasoning and logic, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.
Is Gemini 3 Pro good for agentic tool use and computer tasks?
Gemini 3 Pro has source-displayable benchmark coverage for agentic tool use and computer tasks, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.
Is Gemini 3 Pro good for multimodal and grounded tasks?
Gemini 3 Pro ranks #18 out of 54 eligible models for multimodal and grounded tasks, with a public category score of 80/100. Higher-ranked alternatives are available for workloads where this category decides the choice. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.
Which sibling models are related to Gemini 3 Pro?
Gemini 3 Pro belongs to the Gemini 3 Pro family. Related tracked variants include Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think. A sibling link indicates shared lineage or a documented configuration relationship; it does not mean the variants have identical pricing, context limits, benchmark evidence, or deployment behavior. Compare before switching.
Does Gemini 3 Pro have full benchmark coverage on BenchLM?
No. Gemini 3 Pro currently has 41 source-displayable rows across 681 tracked benchmark slots. The profile exposes published, non-generated evidence and leaves missing categories blank until an exact evaluation is available. Coverage describes how much was measured; it is not a penalty added to an individual benchmark result.
What is the context window size of Gemini 3 Pro?
Gemini 3 Pro has a reported context window of 2M in the exact-model catalog record. The value stays visible, but the profile marks its source link as unavailable instead of presenting it as directly documented. Maximum output length remains separate because providers often publish a different limit.