Model profile
Gemini 3 Pro
Evidence coverage
27 of 321 tracked benchmarks are published. 9 are verified and 18 provisional. 8 of 8 categories are measured.
- Published / tracked
- 27 / 321
- Verified
- 9
- Provisional
- 18
- Categories with evidence
- 8 / 8
Evidence by category
- Agentic3 benchmarksMixed evidence
- Coding3 benchmarksMixed evidence
- Reasoning3 benchmarksMixed evidence
- Knowledge7 benchmarksReported
- Math2 benchmarksVerified
- Multilingual1 benchmarkReported
- Multimodal7 benchmarksMixed evidence
- Inst. Following1 benchmarkReported
Gemini 3 Pro ranks #19 out of 200 models on the public leaderboard with an overall score of 67.73/100. It also ranks #17 out of 99 on the verified leaderboard. This places it in the mid-tier of AI models, with strengths in specific benchmark categories.
Gemini 3 Pro is a proprietary model with a 2M token context window. It processes queries without explicit chain-of-thought reasoning, offering faster response times and lower token usage.
Gemini 3 Pro sits inside the Gemini 3 Pro family alongside Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think. This profile currently has 27 of 321 tracked benchmarks. BenchLM only exposes non-generated benchmark rows publicly, so missing categories stay blank until a sourced evaluation is available.
Its strongest category is Multimodal & Grounded (#9), while its weakest is Knowledge (#27). This performance profile makes it particularly strong for screenshots, documents, charts, and grounded multimodal workflows.
Peer position
Exact provisional scores and ranks for the closest listed peers. A score can appear before a model clears the evidence threshold for a rank, so equal scores can have different rank states.
Range 67.01–67.78
- MiMo-V2-ProXiaomiCompare#1767.78MiMo-V2-Pro is #17 with a score of 67.78.
- GLM-5.1Z.AICompare#1867.74GLM-5.1 is #18 with a score of 67.74.
- Gemini 3 ProCurrent modelGoogle#1967.73Gemini 3 Pro is #19 with a score of 67.73.
- InklingThinking Machines LabCompare#2067.54Inkling is #20 with a score of 67.54.
- Qwen3.7 PlusAlibabaCompare#2167.22Qwen3.7 Plus is #21 with a score of 67.22.
- GPT-5.6 LunaOpenAICompare#2267.17GPT-5.6 Luna is #22 with a score of 67.17.
- GPT-5.2 ProOpenAICompare#2367.01GPT-5.2 Pro is #23 with a score of 67.01.
Category percentile
More
Relative position among models eligible for each sourced category. A higher percentile means a stronger position within that category's ranked cohort; 100 is highest.
- Multimodal71%Eligible cohort rank #9 of 29Category score 73.2
- Agentic90%Eligible cohort rank #13 of 119Category score 59.7
- Coding88%Eligible cohort rank #16 of 122Category score 62.8
- Knowledge49%Eligible cohort rank #27 of 52Category score 71.3
Category evidence
Scores and ranks appear only where this model has published benchmark evidence. Categories without displayable source records remain not measured.
| Category | Score | Rank | Percentile | Weight | Benchmarks | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AgenticRank #13 of 119Percentile 90thWeight 22%3 benchmarksMixed sources | 59.7 | #13 of 119 | 90th | 22% | 3 benchmarks | Mixed sources |
| CodingRank #16 of 122Percentile 88thWeight 20%3 benchmarksMixed sources | 62.8 | #16 of 122 | 88th | 20% | 3 benchmarks | Mixed sources |
| ReasoningRank Not rankedWeight 17%3 benchmarksMixed sources | 45.4 | Not ranked | Not available | 17% | 3 benchmarks | Mixed sources |
| KnowledgeRank #27 of 52Percentile 49thWeight 12%7 benchmarksReported | 71.3 | #27 of 52 | 49th | 12% | 7 benchmarks | Reported |
| MathRank Not rankedWeight 5%2 benchmarksVerified | 56.3 | Not ranked | Not available | 5% | 2 benchmarks | Verified |
| MultilingualRank Not rankedWeight 7%1 benchmarkReported | 85.0 | Not ranked | Not available | 7% | 1 benchmark | Reported |
| MultimodalRank #9 of 29Percentile 71stWeight 12%7 benchmarksMixed sources | 73.2 | #9 of 29 | 71st | 12% | 7 benchmarks | Mixed sources |
| Inst. FollowingRank Not rankedWeight 5%1 benchmarkReported | 80.7 | Not ranked | Not available | 5% | 1 benchmark | Reported |
Chatbot Arena performance
Scroll horizontally to inspect confidence intervals and vote counts.
| View | Elo | Confidence interval | Votes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Text Overall | 1486 | ±3.9 | 41,290 |
| Coding | 1519 | ±7.1 | 8,574 |
| Math | 1478 | ±11.4 | 2,645 |
| Instruction Following | 1474 | ±6.4 | 11,179 |
| Creative Writing | 1485 | ±8.3 | 6,285 |
| Multi-turn | 1495 | ±7.9 | 6,766 |
| Hard Prompts | 1504 | ±5.0 | 22,449 |
| Hard Prompts (English) | 1502 | ±6.5 | 10,718 |
| Longer Query | 1492 | ±6.6 | 10,481 |
Benchmark Details
Rows below have a displayable published verification record. Each source link and provenance note remains in the page HTML while its category is closed. Source-unverified manual rows and generated rows stay hidden.
Agentic3 benchmarks
τ²-Bench Tool-Agent-User Evaluation
Gert Labs Composite Game Benchmark
Coding3 benchmarks
Vibe Code Bench v1.1
Artificial Analysis SciCode
Artificial Analysis LiveCodeBench
Reasoning3 benchmarks
Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus for AGI v2
Artificial Analysis Long Context Reasoning
Critical Physics Tasks
Knowledge7 benchmarks
Artificial Analysis GPQA Diamond
Artificial Analysis Humanity's Last Exam
Artificial Analysis Omniscience Index
Artificial Analysis Omniscience Accuracy
Artificial Analysis Omniscience Hallucination Rate
Artificial Analysis MMLU-Pro
Math2 benchmarks
FrontierMath v2 Tiers 1-3
FrontierMath v2 Tier 4
Multilingual1 benchmark
Artificial Analysis Global-MMLU-Lite
Multimodal7 benchmarks
Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding Pro
CharXiv Reasoning
Artificial Analysis MMMU-Pro
Inst. Following1 benchmark
Artificial Analysis IFBench
Frequently Asked Questions
How does Gemini 3 Pro perform overall in AI benchmarks?
Gemini 3 Pro currently ranks #19 out of 200 models on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard with an overall score of 67.73. It also ranks #17 out of 99 on the verified leaderboard. It is created by Google. Its published context window is 2M.
Is Gemini 3 Pro good for knowledge and understanding?
Gemini 3 Pro ranks #27 out of 52 models in knowledge and understanding benchmarks with an average score of 71.3. There are stronger options in this category.
Is Gemini 3 Pro good for coding and programming?
Gemini 3 Pro ranks #16 out of 122 models in coding and programming benchmarks with an average score of 62.8. There are stronger options in this category.
Is Gemini 3 Pro good for mathematics?
Gemini 3 Pro has visible benchmark coverage in mathematics, but BenchLM does not currently assign it a global category rank there.
Is Gemini 3 Pro good for reasoning and logic?
Gemini 3 Pro has visible benchmark coverage in reasoning and logic, but BenchLM does not currently assign it a global category rank there.
Is Gemini 3 Pro good for agentic tool use and computer tasks?
Gemini 3 Pro ranks #13 out of 119 models in agentic tool use and computer tasks benchmarks with an average score of 59.7. There are stronger options in this category.
Is Gemini 3 Pro good for multimodal and grounded tasks?
Gemini 3 Pro ranks #9 out of 29 models in multimodal and grounded tasks benchmarks with an average score of 73.2. It is among the top performers in this category.
Is Gemini 3 Pro good for instruction following?
Gemini 3 Pro has visible benchmark coverage in instruction following, but BenchLM does not currently assign it a global category rank there.
Is Gemini 3 Pro good for multilingual tasks?
Gemini 3 Pro has visible benchmark coverage in multilingual tasks, but BenchLM does not currently assign it a global category rank there.
Which sibling models are related to Gemini 3 Pro?
Gemini 3 Pro belongs to the Gemini 3 Pro family. Related variants on BenchLM include Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think.
Does Gemini 3 Pro have full benchmark coverage on BenchLM?
Not yet. Gemini 3 Pro currently has 27 published benchmark scores out of the 321 benchmarks BenchLM tracks. BenchLM only exposes non-generated public benchmark rows, so missing categories stay blank until a sourced evaluation is available.
What is the context window size of Gemini 3 Pro?
Gemini 3 Pro has a published context window of 2M, which determines how much text it can process in a single interaction.
Related Resources
Choose with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, new releases, pricing changes, and the evidence behind them.
Free. One email per week.