Skip to main content
BenchLM
Data

Data as of October 17, 2026 · How the score is built

EstablishedProprietaryNon-Reasoning

Released Nov 18, 20252M context

Gemini 3 Pro

Decision readingGemini 3 Pro scores 61.2 out of 100 and ranks #52 of 224. This profile shows 27 source-displayable benchmark rows; its strongest eligible category is Multimodal & Grounded at #18. API pricing is $2 input and $12 output per million tokens.

Released Nov 18, 2025 — see all recent releases

Decision snapshot

Each value carries a field reference instead of floating alone. Markers compare this model with the current ranked and priced catalog; they are not absolute quality thresholds.

Capability

61.2/100

field median 49.6#52 of 224 ranked models

Public

#52of 224

Verified #34 of 88

Price

$2input / $12 output

input median $0.75blended $7

Speed

109tok/s

field median 92 tok/sFirst token 32.65 s

Context

2Mtokens

field median 256,000Reported for this model; direct source link not stored

Strongest published evidence

Multimodal & Grounded ranks #18. Particularly strong for screenshots, documents, charts, and grounded multimodal workflows.

Validate before choosing

27 published rows leave some tracked benchmark slots empty. Coding is its lowest eligible category at #59.

Source-linked · 27 displayable benchmark rows

Category score record

Scores and ranks appear only where published evidence can be displayed. The table keeps the score, weight, cohort, and evidence state together.

Category scores, ranks, weighting, benchmark coverage, and evidence status
CategoryScore
AgenticWeight 22%2 benchmarksVerified
Score pending
CodingRank #59 of 150Percentile 61stWeight 20%1 benchmarkVerified
43.0
ReasoningRank Not rankedWeight 17%2 benchmarksVerified
50.1
MultimodalRank #18 of 54Percentile 68thWeight 12%22 benchmarksMixed sources
80.0
KnowledgeWeight 12%0 benchmarksNot measured
Not measured
MultilingualWeight 7%0 benchmarksNot measured
Not measured
Inst. FollowingWeight 5%0 benchmarksNot measured
Not measured
MathWeight 5%0 benchmarksNot measured
Not measured

27 of 681 tracked benchmark slots have displayable evidence · bars run 0–100

Coverage details

How much of this is verified

Coverage is split by category so a strong number never hides a thin evidence base. Verified means the row is tied to a published source; provisional rows remain visible but separate.

  1. Agentic2/2 verified
  2. Coding1/1 verified
  3. Reasoning2/2 verified
  4. Multimodal3/22 verified
  5. KnowledgeNot measured
  6. MultilingualNot measured
  7. Inst. FollowingNot measured
  8. MathNot measured
Verified sourceProvisionalNot measured

Capability shape

Each axis shows percentile within that category’s eligible cohort. The comparison outline is the median of the six nearest public-score peers; a collapsed vertex means the category is not rank-eligible.

Gemini 3 Pro category percentile values

  • AgenticNot eligible
  • Coding61st percentile
  • ReasoningNot eligible
  • Multimodal68th percentile
  • KnowledgeNot eligible
  • MultilingualNot eligible
  • Instruction followingNot eligible
  • MathNot eligible

The dashed outline is median of 6 nearest peers.

Eligible category ranks

  1. AgenticNot ranked
  2. Coding#59/150
  3. ReasoningNot ranked
  4. Multimodal#18/54
  5. KnowledgeNot ranked
  6. MultilingualNot ranked
  7. Inst. FollowingNot ranked
  8. MathNot ranked
Top decileTop quartileMid-fieldNot eligible

Benchmark ledger

Coding opens by default. The marker compares each value with the best source-verified result in the catalog; provisional leaders do not set the reference. Expand the remaining categories for every published row.

Coding1 row
Coding benchmark values, best verified comparison, weight, and source status
Vibe Code BenchVibe Code Bench v1.1Score14.30%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Gemini 4 Argon · 91.90%

Gap77.6 behindWeightDisplay only
Agentic2 rows
Agentic benchmark values, best verified comparison, weight, and source status
JobBenchScore11.4%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Muse Wonder Full · 75.3%

Gap63.9 behindWeight6% ref. weight
Benchmark exact
Gert LabsGert Labs Composite Game BenchmarkScore63.23%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Claude Opus 4.8 · 72.97%

Gap9.7 behindWeightDisplay only
Benchmark exact
Reasoning2 rows
Reasoning benchmark values, best verified comparison, weight, and source status
ARC-AGI-2Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus for AGI v2Score31.1%Versus best verified row

Best verified: GPT-6 Astra · 95%

Gap63.9 behindWeightWeighted 25%
ARC-AGI-1ARC-AGI-1 Semi-Private EvaluationScore75.00%Versus best verified row

Best verified: GPT-6 Astra · 98.50%

Gap23.5 behindWeightDisplay only
Multimodal22 rows
Multimodal benchmark values, best verified comparison, weight, and source status
MMMU-ProMassive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding ProScore81%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Gemini 3.5 Flash · 83.6%

Gap2.6 behindWeightWeighted 40%
Provider exact
CharXivCharXiv ReasoningScore81.4%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Qwen3.8 Max · 93.5%

Gap12.1 behindWeightWeighted 20%
MMMUMassive Multi-discipline Multimodal UnderstandingScore87.2%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Qwen3.5 397B · 85.0%

Gap2.2 behindWeightDisplay only
RealWorldQAScore83.3%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Qwen3.8-Flash-Next · 88.5%

Gap5.2 behindWeightDisplay only
OmniDocBench 1.5Score88.5%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Qwen3.8 Max · 92.1%

Gap3.6 behindWeightDisplay only
Video-MME (with subtitle)Video-MME with subtitleScore88.4%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Qwen3.8 Max · 90.4%

Gap2 behindWeightDisplay only
Video-MME (w/o subtitle)Video-MME without subtitleScore87.7%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Qwen3.5 397B · 83.7%

Gap4 behindWeightDisplay only
MathVisionScore86.6%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Qwen3.8 Max · 95.2%

Gap8.6 behindWeightDisplay only
We-MathScore86.9%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Qwen3.5 397B · 87.9%

Gap1 behindWeightDisplay only
DynaMathScore85.1%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Qwen3.5 397B · 86.3%

Gap1.2 behindWeightDisplay only
SimpleVQAScore73.2%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Qwen3.7 Plus · 81.7%

Gap8.5 behindWeightDisplay only
MMLongBench-DocScore60.5%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B · 62.8%

Gap2.3 behindWeightDisplay only
CC-OCRScore79.0%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Qwen3.5 397B · 82.0%

Gap3 behindWeightDisplay only
AI2D_TESTAI2D test splitScore94.1%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Qwen3.5 397B · 93.9%

Gap0.2 behindWeightDisplay only
CountBenchScore97.3%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Qwen3.6-27B · 97.8%

Gap0.5 behindWeightDisplay only
RefCOCO (avg)RefCOCO averageScore84.1%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Qwen3.6-27B · 92.5%

Gap8.4 behindWeightDisplay only
ODINW13Score46.3%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Qwen3.7 Plus · 51.1%

Gap4.8 behindWeightDisplay only
ERQAScore70.5%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Qwen3.8 Max · 77.8%

Gap7.3 behindWeightDisplay only
VideoMMMUScore87.6%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Qwen3.8 Max · 88.7%

Gap1.1 behindWeightDisplay only
Provider exact
MLVU (M-Avg)MLVU mean averageScore83.0%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Qwen3.8 Max · 90.8%

Gap7.8 behindWeightDisplay only
ScreenSpot ProScore72.7%Versus best verified row

Best verified: GPT-6 Astra · 92.7%

Gap20 behindWeightDisplay only
V*Score88.0%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Qwen3.6 Plus · 96.9%

Gap8.9 behindWeightDisplay only

Bars run 0–100; the dark tick marks the best source-verified value

All 27 rows

What it costs to get this score

Published API price against the public score. The x-axis uses a log scale; the dashed path marks models that are not beaten by a cheaper, higher-scoring option. Price uses average of published input and output rates.

Current modelExplore all models

Gemini 3 Pro · 61.2 score · $7 blended per million tokens

The chart opens on the current model. Scroll horizontally to inspect the full price axis.

405060708090100$0.10$0.50$1$5$10$25$50$100↘ frontierGemini 3 Pro

Horizontal: blended price per million tokens, log scale · Vertical: public score

Lineage

The sequence follows explicit supersedes links. Each score is estimated for that model; a relative can inform a sparse estimate but never sets a floor, so a newer release can score below an earlier one. Scores and prices remain blank when the corresponding public row or first-party rate is unavailable.

  1. Nov 18, 2025 · you are here

    Gemini 3 Pro

    Score 61.2 · $2 / $12

Spec sheet

Each documented value carries its source. Missing fields stay visible as not sourced or not published, rather than disappearing from the page.

API model ID
Not published
Context window
2M
Maximum output
Not sourced yet
Knowledge cutoff
Not sourced yet
Input modalities
Not sourced yet
Output modalities
Not sourced yet
Parameters
Not disclosed by the provider
Availability
Not sourced yet
Cloud regions
Not tracked yet
Lifecycle
Established
API capabilities
Tool calling, structured outputs, and batch support are not tracked yet
Prompt caching
Not documented in the pricing record
Self-host
Weights are not published
Rate limits
Not tracked yet

How to read this profile

The visual layer above carries the decisions. These notes preserve the model, ranking, coverage, and family context behind the numbers.

Gemini 3 Pro ranks #52 of 224 on the public leaderboard with a score of 61.18/100. Its source-verified position is #34 of 88.

Gemini 3 Pro is a proprietary model with a 2M context window. No explicit reasoning mode is documented in this profile.

Gemini 3 Pro sits in the Gemini 3 Pro family with Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think. 27 of 681 tracked benchmark slots currently have displayable evidence. Missing categories stay blank.

Its strongest eligible category is Multimodal & Grounded at #18, while its lowest eligible position is Coding at #59. particularly strong for screenshots, documents, charts, and grounded multimodal workflows.

Last updated October 17, 2026. Runtime fields remain blank until a sourced snapshot exists.

Questions

How does Gemini 3 Pro perform overall in AI benchmarks?

Gemini 3 Pro ranks #52 out of 224 models on the public BenchAlign leaderboard, with a score of 61.18/100. Its evidence status is Supported, and this profile shows 27 source-displayable benchmark rows. The label describes evidence depth, not a provider quality claim; inspect category rows before choosing a workload.

Is Gemini 3 Pro good for coding and programming?

Gemini 3 Pro ranks #59 out of 150 eligible models for coding and programming, with a public category score of 43/100. Higher-ranked alternatives are available for workloads where this category decides the choice. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.

Is Gemini 3 Pro good for reasoning and logic?

Gemini 3 Pro has source-displayable benchmark coverage for reasoning and logic, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.

Is Gemini 3 Pro good for agentic tool use and computer tasks?

Gemini 3 Pro has source-displayable benchmark coverage for agentic tool use and computer tasks, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.

Is Gemini 3 Pro good for multimodal and grounded tasks?

Gemini 3 Pro ranks #18 out of 54 eligible models for multimodal and grounded tasks, with a public category score of 80/100. Higher-ranked alternatives are available for workloads where this category decides the choice. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.

Which sibling models are related to Gemini 3 Pro?

Gemini 3 Pro belongs to the Gemini 3 Pro family. Related tracked variants include Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think. A sibling link indicates shared lineage or a documented configuration relationship; it does not mean the variants have identical pricing, context limits, benchmark evidence, or deployment behavior. Compare before switching.

Does Gemini 3 Pro have full benchmark coverage on BenchLM?

No. Gemini 3 Pro currently has 41 source-displayable rows across 681 tracked benchmark slots. The profile exposes published, non-generated evidence and leaves missing categories blank until an exact evaluation is available. Coverage describes how much was measured; it is not a penalty added to an individual benchmark result.

What is the context window size of Gemini 3 Pro?

Gemini 3 Pro has a reported context window of 2M in the exact-model catalog record. The value stays visible, but the profile marks its source link as unavailable instead of presenting it as directly documented. Maximum output length remains separate because providers often publish a different limit.

Watch Gemini 3 Pro in the weekly brief

Get one weekly email when material rank, price, availability, or benchmark evidence changes are worth revisiting.

Read a sample issue

Join 5,600+ readers.

Compare Gemini 3 Pro with every tracked model953 comparisons