Capability
67.4/100
field median 59.1
#31 of 230 ranked models
Gemini 3 Pro
Released Nov 18, 2025 — see all recent releases
Decision reading
Gemini 3 Pro scores 67.4 out of 100 and ranks #31 of 230. This profile shows 12 source-displayable benchmark rows; its strongest eligible category is Multimodal & Grounded at #13. API pricing is $2 input and $12 output per million tokens.
Data as of September 2, 2026 · How the score is built
Strongest published evidence
Multimodal & Grounded ranks #13. Particularly strong for screenshots, documents, charts, and grounded multimodal workflows.
Validate before choosing
12 published rows leave some tracked benchmark slots empty. Coding is its lowest eligible category at #30.
Decision snapshot
Each value carries a field reference instead of floating alone. Markers compare this model with the current ranked and priced catalog; they are not absolute quality thresholds.
Price
$2input / $12 output
input median $1
blended $7
Speed
109tok/s
field median 90 tok/s
First token 32.65 s
Context
2Mtokens
field median 256,000
Reported for this model; direct source link not stored
Capability shape
Each axis shows percentile within that category’s eligible cohort. The comparison outline is the median of the six nearest public-score peers; a collapsed vertex means the category is not rank-eligible.
Gemini 3 Pro category percentile values
- Agentic82nd percentile
- Coding80th percentile
- ReasoningNot eligible
- KnowledgeNot eligible
- MathNot eligible
- MultilingualNot eligible
- Multimodal66th percentile
- Instruction followingNot eligible
The dashed outline is median of 6 nearest peers.
Eligible category ranks
- Agentic#26/143
- Coding#30/148
- ReasoningNot ranked
- KnowledgeNot ranked
- MathNot ranked
- MultilingualNot ranked
- Multimodal#13/36
- Inst. FollowingNot ranked
Top decileTop quartileMid-fieldNot eligible
What it costs to get this score
Published API price against the public score. The x-axis uses a log scale; the dashed path marks models that are not beaten by a cheaper, higher-scoring option. Price uses average of published input and output rates.
The chart opens on the current model. Scroll horizontally to inspect the full price axis.
Current modelGemini 3 Pro · 67.4 score · $7 blended per million tokens
Horizontal: blended price per million tokens, log scale · Vertical: public score
How much of this is verified
Coverage is split by category so a strong number never hides a thin evidence base. Verified means the row is tied to a published source; provisional rows remain visible but separate.
- Agentic2/2 verified
- Coding1/1 verified
- Reasoning1/1 verified
- KnowledgeNot measured
- Math2/2 verified
- MultilingualNot measured
- Multimodal3/6 verified
- Inst. FollowingNot measured
Verified sourceProvisionalNot measured
Spec sheet
Each documented value carries its source. Missing fields stay visible as not sourced or not published, rather than disappearing from the page.
- API model ID
- Not published
- Context window
- 2M
- Maximum output
- Not sourced yet
- Knowledge cutoff
- Not sourced yet
- Input modalities
- Not sourced yet
- Output modalities
- Not sourced yet
- Parameters
- Not disclosed by the provider
- Availability
- Not sourced yet
- Cloud regions
- Not tracked yet
- Lifecycle
- Established
- API capabilities
- Tool calling, structured outputs, and batch support are not tracked yet
- Prompt caching
- Not documented in the pricing record
- Self-host
- Weights are not published
- Rate limits
- Not tracked yet
Category score record
Scores and ranks appear only where published evidence can be displayed. The table keeps the score, weight, cohort, and evidence state together.
| Category | Score | Rank | Percentile | Weight | Benchmarks | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AgenticRank #26 of 143Percentile 82ndWeight 22%2 benchmarksVerified | 59.1 | #26 of 143 | 82nd | 22% | 2 benchmarks | Verified |
| CodingRank #30 of 148Percentile 80thWeight 20%1 benchmarkVerified | 62.3 | #30 of 148 | 80th | 20% | 1 benchmark | Verified |
| ReasoningRank Not rankedWeight 17%1 benchmarkVerified | 34.2 | Not ranked | Not available | 17% | 1 benchmark | Verified |
| KnowledgeWeight 12%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 12% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| MathRank Not rankedWeight 5%2 benchmarksVerified | 56.2 | Not ranked | Not available | 5% | 2 benchmarks | Verified |
| MultilingualWeight 7%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 7% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| MultimodalRank #13 of 36Percentile 66thWeight 12%6 benchmarksMixed sources | 69.1 | #13 of 36 | 66th | 12% | 6 benchmarks | Mixed sources |
| Inst. FollowingWeight 5%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 5% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
Benchmark ledger
Coding opens by default. The marker compares each value with the best source-verified result in the catalog; provisional leaders do not set the reference. Expand the remaining categories for every published row.
Coding1 row
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vibe Code BenchVibe Code Bench v1.1 | Score14.30% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Claude Opus 4.7 · 71.00% | Gap56.7 behind | WeightDisplay only | Benchmark exact |
Agentic2 rows
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gert LabsGert Labs Composite Game Benchmark | Score63.23% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Claude Opus 4.8 · 72.97% | Gap9.7 behind | WeightDisplay only | Benchmark exact |
| JobBench | Score11.4% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Muse Spark 1.3 · 64.9% | Gap53.5 behind | WeightDisplay only | Benchmark exact |
Reasoning1 row
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus for AGI v2 | Score31.1% | Versus best verified row Best verified: GPT-5.6 Sol · 92.5% | Gap61.4 behind | WeightWeighted 31% | Provider exact |
Math2 rows
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)FrontierMath v2 Tiers 1-3 | Score37.600% | Versus best verified row Best verified: GPT-5.6 Sol · 89.000% | Gap51.4 behind | WeightWeighted 30% | Benchmark exact |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)FrontierMath v2 Tier 4 | Score18.750% | Versus best verified row Best verified: GPT-5.6 Sol · 83.000% | Gap64.3 behind | WeightWeighted 10% | Benchmark exact |
Multimodal6 rows
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMMU-ProMassive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding Pro | Score81% | Versus best verified row Best verified: GPT-5.4 Pro · 94% | Gap13 behind | WeightWeighted 45% | Provider exact |
| CharXivCharXiv Reasoning | Score81.4% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Qwen3.8 Max · 93.5% | Gap12.1 behind | WeightWeighted 25% | Secondary exact |
| MathVision | Score86.6% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Qwen3.8 Max · 95.2% | Gap8.6 behind | WeightDisplay only | Secondary exact |
| VideoMMMU | Score87.6% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Qwen3.8 Max · 88.7% | Gap1.1 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
| ScreenSpot Pro | Score72.7% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Claude Opus 4.8 · 87.9% | Gap15.2 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
| V* | Score88.0% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Kimi K2.6 · 96.9% | Gap8.9 behind | WeightDisplay only | Secondary exact |
Lineage
The sequence follows explicit supersedes links. A successor's displayed score stays at least 0.1 points above its predecessor; raw benchmark rows do not move. Scores and prices remain blank when the corresponding public row or first-party rate is unavailable.
Nov 18, 2025 · you are here
Gemini 3 ProScore 67.4 · $2 / $12
Base entry
How to read this profile
The visual layer above carries the decisions. These notes preserve the model, ranking, coverage, and family context behind the numbers.
Gemini 3 Pro ranks #31 of 230 on the public leaderboard with a score of 67.39/100. Its source-verified position is #20 of 105.
Gemini 3 Pro is a proprietary model with a 2M context window. No explicit reasoning mode is documented in this profile.
Gemini 3 Pro sits in the Gemini 3 Pro family with Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think. 12 of 416 tracked benchmark slots currently have displayable evidence. Missing categories stay blank.
Its strongest eligible category is Multimodal & Grounded at #13, while its lowest eligible position is Coding at #30. particularly strong for screenshots, documents, charts, and grounded multimodal workflows.
Radar
Full release historyGemini 3 Pro release history
Gemini 3 released
Google · Model release
Source confirmed
Radar confirmed these at the source. Already tracking Gemini 3 Pro? See the free Radar Brief for what changes next.
Frequently asked questions
How does Gemini 3 Pro perform overall in AI benchmarks?
Gemini 3 Pro ranks #31 out of 230 models on the public BenchAlign leaderboard, with a score of 67.39/100. Its evidence status is Supported, and this profile shows 12 source-displayable benchmark rows. The label describes evidence depth, not a provider quality claim; inspect category rows before choosing a workload.
Is Gemini 3 Pro good for coding and programming?
Gemini 3 Pro ranks #30 out of 148 eligible models for coding and programming, with a public category score of 62.3/100. Higher-ranked alternatives are available for workloads where this category decides the choice. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.
Is Gemini 3 Pro good for mathematics?
Gemini 3 Pro has source-displayable benchmark coverage for mathematics, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.
Is Gemini 3 Pro good for reasoning and logic?
Gemini 3 Pro has source-displayable benchmark coverage for reasoning and logic, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.
Is Gemini 3 Pro good for agentic tool use and computer tasks?
Gemini 3 Pro ranks #26 out of 143 eligible models for agentic tool use and computer tasks, with a public category score of 59.1/100. Higher-ranked alternatives are available for workloads where this category decides the choice. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.
Is Gemini 3 Pro good for multimodal and grounded tasks?
Gemini 3 Pro ranks #13 out of 36 eligible models for multimodal and grounded tasks, with a public category score of 69.1/100. Higher-ranked alternatives are available for workloads where this category decides the choice. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.
Which sibling models are related to Gemini 3 Pro?
Gemini 3 Pro belongs to the Gemini 3 Pro family. Related tracked variants include Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think. A sibling link indicates shared lineage or a documented configuration relationship; it does not mean the variants have identical pricing, context limits, benchmark evidence, or deployment behavior. Compare before switching.
Does Gemini 3 Pro have full benchmark coverage on BenchLM?
No. Gemini 3 Pro currently has 27 source-displayable rows across 416 tracked benchmark slots. The profile exposes published, non-generated evidence and leaves missing categories blank until an exact evaluation is available. Coverage describes how much was measured; it is not a penalty added to an individual benchmark result.
What is the context window size of Gemini 3 Pro?
Gemini 3 Pro has a reported context window of 2M in the exact-model catalog record. The value stays visible, but the profile marks its source link as unavailable instead of presenting it as directly documented. Maximum output length remains separate because providers often publish a different limit.
Compare Gemini 3 Pro with every tracked model409 comparisons
Last updated September 2, 2026. Runtime fields remain blank until a sourced snapshot exists.
Watch Gemini 3 Pro in the weekly brief
Get one weekly email when material rank, price, availability, or benchmark evidence changes are worth revisiting.
Read a sample issueJoin 2,000+ readers.