Skip to main content

Model profile

GPT-5.4 Pro

OpenAICurrentReleased Mar 5, 2026
Data verified
Overall Score
60.89Public #44 of 200
Arena Elo
1478
Eligible category ranks
1of 8
Price (1M tokens)
$30 in / $180 out
API pricing
Speed
74tok/s
Context
1.05M

Evidence coverage

12 of 323 tracked benchmarks are published. 9 are verified and 3 provisional. 5 of 8 categories are measured.

Updated July 22, 2026Methodology
Published / tracked
12 / 323
Verified
9
Provisional
3
Categories with evidence
5 / 8

Evidence by category

  • Agentic1 benchmark
    Verified
  • Coding0 benchmarks
    Not measured
  • Reasoning2 benchmarks
    Mixed evidence
  • Knowledge4 benchmarks
    Mixed evidence
  • Math4 benchmarks
    Mixed evidence
  • Multilingual0 benchmarks
    Not measured
  • Multimodal1 benchmark
    Verified
  • Inst. Following0 benchmarks
    Not measured
ProprietaryReasoning
Confidence:
Medium
pro

GPT-5.4 Pro ranks #44 out of 200 models on the public leaderboard with an overall score of 60.89/100. It does not yet have enough sourced coverage for BenchLM's verified leaderboard. While not a frontier model, it offers specific advantages depending on the use case.

GPT-5.4 Pro is a proprietary model with a 1.05M token context window. It uses explicit chain-of-thought reasoning, which typically improves performance on math and complex reasoning tasks at the cost of higher latency and token usage.

GPT-5.4 Pro sits inside the GPT-5.4 family alongside GPT-5.4, GPT-5.4 mini, GPT-5.4 nano. This profile currently has 12 of 323 tracked benchmarks. BenchLM only exposes non-generated benchmark rows publicly, so missing categories stay blank until a sourced evaluation is available.

Its strongest category is Agentic (#17). This performance profile makes it particularly useful for coding agents, browser research, and computer-use workflows.

Peer position

Exact provisional scores and ranks for the closest listed peers. A score can appear before a model clears the evidence threshold for a rank, so equal scores can have different rank states.

Range 60.5161.16

  1. GLM-4.7
    Z.AI
    #4261.16
    GLM-4.7 is #42 with a score of 61.16.
    Compare
  2. Gemma 4 31B
    Google
    #4361.08
    Gemma 4 31B is #43 with a score of 61.08.
    Compare
  3. GPT-5.4 ProCurrent model
    OpenAI
    #4460.89
    GPT-5.4 Pro is #44 with a score of 60.89.
  4. Qwen3.5-27B
    Alibaba
    #4560.7
    Qwen3.5-27B is #45 with a score of 60.7.
    Compare
  5. DeepSeek V4 Pro
    DeepSeek
    #4660.66
    DeepSeek V4 Pro is #46 with a score of 60.66.
    Compare
  6. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
    Alibaba
    #4760.56
    Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is #47 with a score of 60.56.
    Compare
  7. Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning)
    xAI
    #4860.51
    Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) is #48 with a score of 60.51.
    Compare

Category percentile

More

Relative position among models eligible for each sourced category. A higher percentile means a stronger position within that category's ranked cohort; 100 is highest.

  1. Agentic86%
    Eligible cohort rank #17 of 119Category score 58.2

Category evidence

Scores and ranks appear only where this model has published benchmark evidence. Categories without displayable source records remain not measured.

Category scores, ranks, weighting, benchmark coverage, and evidence status
CategoryScore
AgenticRank #17 of 119Percentile 86thWeight 22%1 benchmarkVerified58.2
CodingWeight 20%0 benchmarksNot measuredNot measured
ReasoningRank Not rankedWeight 17%2 benchmarksMixed sources92.7
KnowledgeRank Not rankedWeight 12%4 benchmarksMixed sources93.5
MathRank Not rankedWeight 5%4 benchmarksMixed sources70.8
MultilingualWeight 7%0 benchmarksNot measuredNot measured
MultimodalRank Not rankedWeight 12%1 benchmarkVerified87.9
Inst. FollowingWeight 5%0 benchmarksNot measuredNot measured

Chatbot Arena performance

Scroll horizontally to inspect confidence intervals and vote counts.

Chatbot Arena Elo, confidence interval, and vote count by evaluation view
ViewEloConfidence intervalVotes
Text Overall1478±4.058,116
Coding1521±6.215,756
Math1495±11.33,042
Instruction Following1476±5.819,104
Creative Writing1444±7.49,589
Multi-turn1493±7.010,720
Hard Prompts1499±4.837,471
Hard Prompts (English)1496±5.818,209
Longer Query1484±5.624,527

Benchmark Details

Rows below have a displayable published verification record. Each source link and provenance note remains in the page HTML while its category is closed. Source-unverified manual rows and generated rows stay hidden.

Agentic1 benchmark
BrowseCompProvider exact
89.3%Weighted 28%
Source: OpenAI: Introducing GPT-5.4Provenance: Provider exact
Reasoning2 benchmarks
ARC-AGI-2Provider exact

Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus for AGI v2

83.3%Weighted 31%
Source: OpenAI: Introducing GPT-5.4Provenance: OpenAI abstract reasoning table reports ARC-AGI-2 (Verified) at 83.3% for GPT-5.4 Pro.
CritPtReported

Critical Physics Tasks

30.0%Display only
Source: Artificial Analysis: critpt leaderboardProvenance: Display-only row synced from the current Artificial Analysis evaluation leaderboard. It is excluded from BenchLM weighted scoring.
Knowledge4 benchmarks
HLEProvider exact

Humanity's Last Exam

58.7%Weighted 45%
Source: OpenAI: Introducing GPT-5.4Provenance: OpenAI academic evaluation table reports Humanity's Last Exam (with tools) at 58.7% for GPT-5.4 Pro.
FrontierScienceProvider exact
36.7%Display only
Source: OpenAI: Introducing GPT-5.4Provenance: OpenAI academic evaluation table reports Frontier Science Research at 36.7% for GPT-5.4 Pro.
FrontierScience ResearchSecondary exact
36.7%Display only
Source: Meta AI: Muse Spark contemplating comparison chartProvenance: Secondary exact
HLE w/o toolsProvider exact

Humanity's Last Exam without tools

42.7%Display only
Source: OpenAI: Introducing GPT-5.4Provenance: OpenAI academic evaluation table reports Humanity's Last Exam (no tools) at 42.7% for GPT-5.4 Pro.
Math4 benchmarks
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Benchmark exact

FrontierMath v2 Tiers 1-3

50.000%Weighted 30%
Source: Epoch AI FrontierMath v2 leaderboardProvenance: Epoch AI reports FrontierMath v2 Tiers 1-3 at 50% for gpt-5.4-pro-2026-03-05_xhigh. BenchLM selects the highest published thinking effort for the model and stores the v2 benchmark slice separately.
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Benchmark exact

FrontierMath v2 Tier 4

37.500%Weighted 10%
Source: Epoch AI FrontierMath v2 leaderboardProvenance: Epoch AI reports FrontierMath v2 Tier 4 at 37.5% for gpt-5.4-pro-2026-03-05-web-app. BenchLM selects the highest published thinking effort for the model and stores the v2 benchmark slice separately.
IPhO 2025 (Theory)Secondary exact

International Physics Olympiad 2025 (Theory)

93.5%Display only
Source: Meta AI: Muse Spark contemplating comparison chartProvenance: Secondary exact
FrontierMath (legacy)Provider exact

FrontierMath legacy aggregate

50%Display only
Source: OpenAI: Introducing GPT-5.4Provenance: OpenAI academic evaluation table reports FrontierMath Tier 1–3 at 50.0% for GPT-5.4 Pro.
Multimodal1 benchmark
MMMU-ProProvider exact

Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding Pro

94%Weighted 45%
Source: OpenAI: Introducing GPT-5.4Provenance: OpenAI multimodal evaluation table reports MMMU-Pro at 94.0% for GPT-5.4 Pro.

Frequently Asked Questions

How does GPT-5.4 Pro perform overall in AI benchmarks?

GPT-5.4 Pro has 12 published benchmark scores on BenchLM, but it does not yet have enough non-generated coverage to receive a global overall rank.

Is GPT-5.4 Pro good for knowledge and understanding?

GPT-5.4 Pro has visible benchmark coverage in knowledge and understanding, but BenchLM does not currently assign it a global category rank there.

Is GPT-5.4 Pro good for mathematics?

GPT-5.4 Pro has visible benchmark coverage in mathematics, but BenchLM does not currently assign it a global category rank there.

Is GPT-5.4 Pro good for reasoning and logic?

GPT-5.4 Pro has visible benchmark coverage in reasoning and logic, but BenchLM does not currently assign it a global category rank there.

Is GPT-5.4 Pro good for agentic tool use and computer tasks?

GPT-5.4 Pro ranks #17 out of 119 models in agentic tool use and computer tasks benchmarks with an average score of 58.2. There are stronger options in this category.

Is GPT-5.4 Pro good for multimodal and grounded tasks?

GPT-5.4 Pro has visible benchmark coverage in multimodal and grounded tasks, but BenchLM does not currently assign it a global category rank there.

Which sibling models are related to GPT-5.4 Pro?

GPT-5.4 Pro belongs to the GPT-5.4 family. Related variants on BenchLM include GPT-5.4, GPT-5.4 mini, GPT-5.4 nano.

Does GPT-5.4 Pro have full benchmark coverage on BenchLM?

Not yet. GPT-5.4 Pro currently has 12 published benchmark scores out of the 323 benchmarks BenchLM tracks. BenchLM only exposes non-generated public benchmark rows, so missing categories stay blank until a sourced evaluation is available.

What is the context window size of GPT-5.4 Pro?

GPT-5.4 Pro has a published context window of 1.05M, which determines how much text it can process in a single interaction.

Last updated: July 22, 2026 · Runtime metrics stay blank until BenchLM has a sourced snapshot.

Choose with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, new releases, pricing changes, and the evidence behind them.

Free. One email per week.