Skip to main content
BenchLM
Data

Data as of October 20, 2026 · How the score is built

EstablishedProprietaryReasoning

Released Mar 5, 20261.05M context

GPT-5.4 Pro

Decision readingGPT-5.4 Pro scores 68.7 out of 100 and ranks #22 of 227. This profile shows 11 source-displayable benchmark rows. API pricing is $30 input and $180 output per million tokens.

Released Mar 5, 2026 — see all recent releases

Decision snapshot

Each value carries a field reference instead of floating alone. Markers compare this model with the current ranked and priced catalog; they are not absolute quality thresholds.

Capability

68.7/100

field median 49.8#22 of 227 ranked models

Public

#22of 227

Verified —

Price

$30input / $180 output

input median $0.72blended $105

Speed

74tok/s

field median 93.5 tok/sFirst token 151.79 s

Context

1.05Mtokens

field median 256,000Maximum output length is tracked separately

Strongest published evidence

Published rows are visible, but no category has enough eligible evidence for a comparative rank.

Validate before choosing

11 published rows leave some tracked benchmark slots empty.

Source-linked · 11 displayable benchmark rows

Category score record

Scores and ranks appear only where published evidence can be displayed. The table keeps the score, weight, cohort, and evidence state together.

Category scores, ranks, weighting, benchmark coverage, and evidence status
CategoryScore
AgenticRank Not rankedWeight 22%1 benchmarkVerified
79.3
CodingWeight 20%0 benchmarksNot measured
Not measured
ReasoningRank Not rankedWeight 17%2 benchmarksVerified
78.1
MultimodalWeight 12%0 benchmarksNot measured
Not measured
KnowledgeRank Not rankedWeight 12%4 benchmarksMixed sources
83.5
MultilingualWeight 7%0 benchmarksNot measured
Not measured
Inst. FollowingWeight 5%0 benchmarksNot measured
Not measured
MathRank Not rankedWeight 5%4 benchmarksMixed sources
86.5

11 of 726 tracked benchmark slots have displayable evidence · bars run 0–100

Coverage details

How much of this is verified

Coverage is split by category so a strong number never hides a thin evidence base. Verified means the row is tied to a published source; provisional rows remain visible but separate.

  1. Agentic1/1 verified
  2. CodingNot measured
  3. Reasoning2/2 verified
  4. MultimodalNot measured
  5. Knowledge3/4 verified
  6. MultilingualNot measured
  7. Inst. FollowingNot measured
  8. Math3/4 verified
Verified sourceProvisionalNot measured

Benchmark ledger

Agentic opens by default. The marker compares each value with the best source-verified result in the catalog; provisional leaders do not set the reference. Expand the remaining categories for every published row.

Agentic1 row
Agentic benchmark values, best verified comparison, weight, and source status
BrowseCompScore89.3%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Atria Dawn Preview · 92.5%

Gap3.2 behindWeight8% ref. weight
Reasoning2 rows
Reasoning benchmark values, best verified comparison, weight, and source status
ARC-AGI-2Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus for AGI v2Score83.3%Versus best verified row

Best verified: GPT-6 Astra · 95%

Gap11.7 behindWeightWeighted 25%
ARC-AGI-1ARC-AGI-1 Semi-Private EvaluationScore94.50%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Claude Fable 5 · 98.50%

Gap4 behindWeightDisplay only
Knowledge4 rows
Knowledge benchmark values, best verified comparison, weight, and source status
HLEHumanity's Last ExamScore58.7%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Claude Fable 5.1 · 65%

Gap6.3 behindWeight44% ref. weight
HLE w/o toolsHumanity's Last Exam without toolsScore42.7%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Claude Opus 5.5 · 64.4%

Gap21.7 behindWeight7% ref. weight
FrontierScienceScore36.7%Versus best verified row

Best verified: GPT-5.4 Pro · 36.7%

GapBest verifiedWeightDisplay only
FrontierScience ResearchScore36.7%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Apodex 1.1 · 63.3%

Gap26.6 behindWeightDisplay only
Math4 rows
Math benchmark values, best verified comparison, weight, and source status
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)FrontierMath v2 Tiers 1-3Score82.456%Versus best verified row

Best verified: GPT-6 Astra · 93.684%

Gap11.2 behindWeightWeighted 30%
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)FrontierMath v2 Tier 4Score58.537%Versus best verified row

Best verified: GPT-6.1 Sol · 100.000%

Gap41.5 behindWeightWeighted 10%
IPhO 2025 (Theory)International Physics Olympiad 2025 (Theory)Score93.5%Versus best verified rowGapNo verified comparatorWeightDisplay only
FrontierMath (legacy)FrontierMath legacy aggregateScore50%Versus best verified row

Best verified: GPT-5.6 Sol · 89%

Gap39 behindWeightDisplay only

Bars run 0–100; the dark tick marks the best source-verified value

All 11 rows

What it costs to get this score

Published API price against the public score. The x-axis uses a log scale; the dashed path marks models that are not beaten by a cheaper, higher-scoring option. Price uses average of published input and output rates.

Current modelExplore all models

GPT-5.4 Pro · 68.7 score · $105 blended per million tokens

The chart opens on the current model. Scroll horizontally to inspect the full price axis.

405060708090100$0.10$0.50$1$5$10$25$50$100↘ frontierGPT-5.4 Pro

Horizontal: blended price per million tokens, log scale · Vertical: public score

Lineage

The sequence follows explicit supersedes links. Each score is estimated for that model; a relative can inform a sparse estimate but never sets a floor, so a newer release can score below an earlier one. Scores and prices remain blank when the corresponding public row or first-party rate is unavailable.

  1. Mar 5, 2026 · you are here

    GPT-5.4 Pro

    Score 68.7 · $30 / $180

Spec sheet

Each documented value carries its source. Missing fields stay visible as not sourced or not published, rather than disappearing from the page.

Maximum output
Not sourced yet
Knowledge cutoff
Not sourced yet
Input modalities
text, imageOpenAI model catalog
Output modalities
textOpenAI model catalog
Parameters
Not disclosed by the provider
Availability
OpenAI Responses APIOpenAI model catalog
Cloud regions
Not tracked yet
API capabilities
Tool calling, structured outputs, and batch support are not tracked yet
Prompt caching
Not documented in the pricing recordOpenAI pricing
Self-host
Weights are not published
Rate limits
Not tracked yet

How to read this profile

The visual layer above carries the decisions. These notes preserve the model, ranking, coverage, and family context behind the numbers.

GPT-5.4 Pro ranks #22 of 227 on the public leaderboard with a score of 68.69/100. It does not yet have enough sourced coverage for a verified position.

GPT-5.4 Pro is a proprietary model with a 1.05M context window. It uses an explicit reasoning mode, which can improve complex problem solving while adding latency and token use.

GPT-5.4 Pro sits in the GPT-5.4 family with GPT-5.4, GPT-5.4 mini, GPT-5.4 nano. 11 of 726 tracked benchmark slots currently have displayable evidence. Missing categories stay blank.

Last updated October 20, 2026. Runtime fields remain blank until a sourced snapshot exists.

Deployment options

Self-host and provider-specific paths stay separate from benchmark evidence so operating constraints are visible before a score becomes the whole decision.

Where to run GPT-5.4 Pro by API

OpenRouter is the one host we track that publishes a per-token price for it. Prices read from each host’s own pages on October 20, 2026.

Inference hosts for GPT-5.4 Pro with input, output and cached-input prices per million tokens.
HostInput /1MOutput /1MCached /1MContext
OpenRouter$30.00$180.00—1.05M
Compare inference hosts

Questions

How does GPT-5.4 Pro perform overall in AI benchmarks?

GPT-5.4 Pro ranks #22 out of 227 models on the public BenchAlign leaderboard, with a score of 68.69/100. Its evidence status is Estimated, and this profile shows 11 source-displayable benchmark rows. The label describes evidence depth, not a provider quality claim; inspect category rows before choosing a workload.

Is GPT-5.4 Pro good for knowledge and understanding?

GPT-5.4 Pro has source-displayable benchmark coverage for knowledge and understanding, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.

Is GPT-5.4 Pro good for mathematics?

GPT-5.4 Pro has source-displayable benchmark coverage for mathematics, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.

Is GPT-5.4 Pro good for reasoning and logic?

GPT-5.4 Pro has source-displayable benchmark coverage for reasoning and logic, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.

Is GPT-5.4 Pro good for agentic tool use and computer tasks?

GPT-5.4 Pro has source-displayable benchmark coverage for agentic tool use and computer tasks, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.

Which sibling models are related to GPT-5.4 Pro?

GPT-5.4 Pro belongs to the GPT-5.4 family. Related tracked variants include GPT-5.4, GPT-5.4 mini, GPT-5.4 nano. A sibling link indicates shared lineage or a documented configuration relationship; it does not mean the variants have identical pricing, context limits, benchmark evidence, or deployment behavior. Compare before switching.

Does GPT-5.4 Pro have full benchmark coverage on BenchLM?

No. GPT-5.4 Pro currently has 12 source-displayable rows. The profile exposes published, non-generated evidence and leaves missing categories blank until an exact evaluation is available. Coverage describes how much was measured; it is not a penalty added to an individual benchmark result.

What is the context window size of GPT-5.4 Pro?

GPT-5.4 Pro has a documented context window of 1.05M. That figure is the maximum combined prompt and retained-conversation space reported for this exact model; it is not the maximum output length. The profile keeps output limits separate because providers often publish those limits independently.

Watch GPT-5.4 Pro in the weekly brief

Get one weekly email when material rank, price, availability, or benchmark evidence changes are worth revisiting.

Read a sample issue

Join 5,600+ readers.

Compare GPT-5.4 Pro with every tracked model971 comparisons