Interfaze Beta released
Interfaze · Model release
Source confirmed
Data as of September 24, 2026 · How the score is built
CurrentProprietaryReasoning
Released May 11, 20261M context
Interfaze Beta
Decision readingInterfaze Beta is tracked, but not publicly ranked yet. The profile exposes 9 sourced benchmark rows and leaves unsupported fields blank until a published record exists.
Released May 11, 2026 — see all recent releases
Interfaze Beta will be repriced, updated or retired. Get each notice with its source and date. Follow model changes
Share or export
Decision snapshot
Each value carries a field reference instead of floating alone. Markers compare this model with the current ranked and priced catalog; they are not absolute quality thresholds.
Capability
Unranked
field median 50.2Not eligible for a public rank
Price
$1.50input / $3.50 output
input median $0.97blended $2.50
Speed
Not measured
field median 91 tok/sTime to first token not measured
Context
1Mtokens
field median 256,000Reported for this model; direct source link not stored
Strongest published evidence
Published rows are visible, but no category has enough eligible evidence for a comparative rank.
Validate before choosing
9 published rows leave some tracked benchmark slots empty. Independent runtime speed has not been measured.
Source-linked · 9 displayable benchmark rows
Follow model changesCategory score record
Scores and ranks appear only where published evidence can be displayed. The table keeps the score, weight, cohort, and evidence state together.
| Category | Score | Rank | Percentile | Weight | Benchmarks | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AgenticWeight 22%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | 0 benchmarks | Not measured | |||
| CodingWeight 20%1 benchmarkVerified | Score pending | 1 benchmark | Verified | |||
| ReasoningWeight 17%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | 0 benchmarks | Not measured | |||
| MultimodalRank Not rankedWeight 12%4 benchmarksVerified | 27.6 | 4 benchmarks | Verified | |||
| KnowledgeRank Not rankedWeight 12%3 benchmarksVerified | 78.8 | 3 benchmarks | Verified | |||
| MultilingualWeight 7%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | 0 benchmarks | Not measured | |||
| Inst. FollowingWeight 5%1 benchmarkVerified | Score pending | 1 benchmark | Verified | |||
| MathWeight 5%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
9 of 483 tracked benchmark slots have displayable evidence · bars run 0–100
Coverage detailsHow much of this is verified
Coverage is split by category so a strong number never hides a thin evidence base. Verified means the row is tied to a published source; provisional rows remain visible but separate.
- AgenticNot measured
- Coding1/1 verified
- ReasoningNot measured
- Multimodal4/4 verified
- Knowledge3/3 verified
- MultilingualNot measured
- Inst. Following1/1 verified
- MathNot measured
Verified sourceProvisionalNot measured
Benchmark ledger
Coding opens by default. The marker compares each value with the best source-verified result in the catalog; provisional leaders do not set the reference. Expand the remaining categories for every published row.
Coding1 row
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spider 2.0-Lite | Score52.9% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Interfaze Beta · 52.9% | GapBest verified | WeightDisplay only |
Multimodal4 rows
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMMU-ProMassive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding Pro | Score71.1% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Gemini 3.5 Flash · 83.6% | Gap12.5 behind | WeightWeighted 40% | |
| OCRBench V2 | Score70.7% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Qwen3.8 Max · 74.2% | Gap3.5 behind | WeightDisplay only | |
| olmOCRolmOCR-Bench | Score85.7% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Interfaze Beta · 85.7% | GapBest verified | WeightDisplay only | |
| RefCOCO (avg)RefCOCO average | Score82.1% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Qwen3.6-27B · 92.5% | Gap10.4 behind | WeightDisplay only |
Knowledge3 rows
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPQAGraduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A | Score89.9% | Versus best verified row Best verified: GPT-6 Astra · 96% | Gap6.1 behind | Weight3% ref. weight | |
| GPQA-DGPQA Diamond | Score89.9% | Versus best verified row Best verified: GPT-6 Astra · 96.0% | Gap6.1 behind | WeightDisplay only | |
| MMMLU | Score90.9% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Interfaze Beta · 90.9% | GapBest verified | WeightDisplay only |
Inst. Following1 row
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOB Value AccStructured Output Benchmark Value Accuracy | Score79.5% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Interfaze Beta · 79.5% | GapBest verified | WeightDisplay only |
Bars run 0–100; the dark tick marks the best source-verified value
All 9 rowsLineage
The sequence follows explicit supersedes links. Each score is estimated for that model; a relative can inform a sparse estimate but never sets a floor, so a newer release can score below an earlier one. Scores and prices remain blank when the corresponding public row or first-party rate is unavailable.
beta · beta
Radar
Full release historyInterfaze Beta release history
Radar confirmed these at the source. Use Interfaze Beta in your work? Explore Radar to follow supported changes and choose your alerts.
Radar
Spec sheet
Each documented value carries its source. Missing fields stay visible as not sourced or not published, rather than disappearing from the page.
- API model ID
- Not published
- Context window
- 1M
- Maximum output
- Not sourced yet
- Knowledge cutoff
- Not sourced yet
- Input modalities
- Not sourced yet
- Output modalities
- Not sourced yet
- Parameters
- Not disclosed by the provider
- Availability
- Not sourced yet
- Cloud regions
- Not tracked yet
- Lifecycle
- Current
- API capabilities
- Tool calling, structured outputs, and batch support are not tracked yet
- Prompt caching
- Not documented in the pricing record
- Self-host
- Weights are not published
- Rate limits
- Not tracked yet
How to read this profile
The visual layer above carries the decisions. These notes preserve the model, ranking, coverage, and family context behind the numbers.
We track Interfaze Beta, but the public leaderboard excludes this profile until enough non-generated benchmark coverage is available. Only published rows appear above.
Interfaze Beta is a proprietary model with a 1M context window. It uses an explicit reasoning mode, which can improve complex problem solving while adding latency and token use.
9 of 483 tracked benchmark slots currently have displayable evidence. Missing categories stay blank.
Last updated September 24, 2026. Runtime fields remain blank until a sourced snapshot exists.
Questions
How does Interfaze Beta perform overall in AI benchmarks?
Interfaze Beta has 9 source-displayable benchmark rows, but it does not qualify for a public overall rank. The available rows remain visible by category without being converted into a site-wide score. Missing evidence stays blank instead of being estimated from an earlier model.
Is Interfaze Beta good for knowledge and understanding?
Interfaze Beta has source-displayable benchmark coverage for knowledge and understanding, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.
Is Interfaze Beta good for coding and programming?
Interfaze Beta has source-displayable benchmark coverage for coding and programming, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.
Is Interfaze Beta good for multimodal and grounded tasks?
Interfaze Beta has source-displayable benchmark coverage for multimodal and grounded tasks, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.
Is Interfaze Beta good for instruction following?
Interfaze Beta has source-displayable benchmark coverage for instruction following, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.
Does Interfaze Beta have full benchmark coverage on BenchLM?
No. Interfaze Beta currently has 10 source-displayable rows across 483 tracked benchmark slots. The profile exposes published, non-generated evidence and leaves missing categories blank until an exact evaluation is available. Coverage describes how much was measured; it is not a penalty added to an individual benchmark result.
What is the context window size of Interfaze Beta?
Interfaze Beta has a reported context window of 1M in the exact-model catalog record. The value stays visible, but the profile marks its source link as unavailable instead of presenting it as directly documented. Maximum output length remains separate because providers often publish a different limit.