Skip to main content
Radar

Provider changes are easy to miss. Radar watches releases, pricing, deprecations, and incidents at the source.Provider changes are easy to miss.

See Radar

Model profile · Interfaze

Interfaze Beta

CurrentReleased May 11, 2026ProprietaryReasoning1M context

Released May 11, 2026 see all recent releases

Interfaze Beta is tracked, but not publicly ranked yet. The profile exposes 9 sourced benchmark rows and leaves unsupported fields blank until a published record exists.

Data as of August 10, 2026 · How the score is built

Strongest published evidence

Published rows are visible, but no category has enough eligible evidence for a comparative rank.

Validate before choosing

9 published rows leave some tracked benchmark slots empty. Independent runtime speed has not been measured.

Decision snapshot

Each value carries a field reference instead of floating alone. Markers compare this model with the current ranked and priced catalog; they are not absolute quality thresholds.

Capability

Unranked

field median 57.6

Not eligible for a public rank

Price

$1.50input / $3.50 output

input median $1

blended $2.50

Speed

Not measured

field median 89 tok/s

Time to first token not measured

Context

1Mtokens

field median 200,000

Reported for this model; direct source link not stored

How much of this is verified

Coverage is split by category so a strong number never hides a thin evidence base. Verified means the row is tied to a published source; provisional rows remain visible but separate.

  1. AgenticNot measured
  2. Coding1/1 verified
  3. ReasoningNot measured
  4. Knowledge3/3 verified
  5. MathNot measured
  6. MultilingualNot measured
  7. Multimodal4/4 verified
  8. Inst. Following1/1 verified
Verified sourceProvisionalNot measured

Spec sheet

Each documented value carries its source. Missing fields stay visible as not sourced or not published, rather than disappearing from the page.

API model ID
Not published
Context window
1M
Maximum output
Not sourced yet
Knowledge cutoff
Not sourced yet
Input modalities
Not sourced yet
Output modalities
Not sourced yet
Parameters
Not disclosed by the provider
Availability
Not sourced yet
Cloud regions
Not tracked yet
Lifecycle
Current
API capabilities
Tool calling, structured outputs, and batch support are not tracked yet
Prompt caching
Not documented in the pricing record
Self-host
Weights are not published
Rate limits
Not tracked yet

Category score record

Scores and ranks appear only where published evidence can be displayed. The table keeps the score, weight, cohort, and evidence state together.

Category scores, ranks, weighting, benchmark coverage, and evidence status
CategoryScore
AgenticWeight 22%0 benchmarksNot measuredNot measured
CodingWeight 20%1 benchmarkVerifiedScore pending
ReasoningWeight 17%0 benchmarksNot measuredNot measured
KnowledgeRank Not rankedWeight 12%3 benchmarksVerified78.7
MathWeight 5%0 benchmarksNot measuredNot measured
MultilingualWeight 7%0 benchmarksNot measuredNot measured
MultimodalRank Not rankedWeight 12%4 benchmarksVerified36.2
Inst. FollowingWeight 5%1 benchmarkVerifiedScore pending

Benchmark ledger

Coding opens by default. The marker compares each value with the best source-verified result in the catalog; provisional leaders do not set the reference. Expand the remaining categories for every published row.

Coding1 row
Coding benchmark values, best verified comparison, weight, and source status
Spider 2.0-LiteScore52.9%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Interfaze Beta · 52.9%

GapBest verifiedWeightDisplay only
Knowledge3 rows
Knowledge benchmark values, best verified comparison, weight, and source status
GPQAGraduate-Level Google-Proof Q&AScore89.9%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Sakana Fugu-Ultra · 95.5%

Gap5.6 behindWeightWeighted 7%
GPQA-DGPQA DiamondScore89.9%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Sakana Fugu-Ultra · 95.5%

Gap5.6 behindWeightDisplay only
MMMLUScore90.9%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Interfaze Beta · 90.9%

GapBest verifiedWeightDisplay only
Multimodal4 rows
Multimodal benchmark values, best verified comparison, weight, and source status
MMMU-ProMassive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding ProScore71.1%Versus best verified row

Best verified: GPT-5.4 Pro · 94%

Gap22.9 behindWeightWeighted 45%
OCRBench V2Score70.7%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Qwen3.8 Max · 74.2%

Gap3.5 behindWeightDisplay only
olmOCRolmOCR-BenchScore85.7%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Interfaze Beta · 85.7%

GapBest verifiedWeightDisplay only
RefCOCO (avg)RefCOCO averageScore82.1%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Qwen3.6-27B · 92.5%

Gap10.4 behindWeightDisplay only
Inst. Following1 row
Inst. Following benchmark values, best verified comparison, weight, and source status
SOB Value AccStructured Output Benchmark Value AccuracyScore79.5%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Interfaze Beta · 79.5%

GapBest verifiedWeightDisplay only

Lineage

The sequence follows explicit supersedes links. Scores and prices remain blank when the corresponding public row or first-party rate is unavailable.

May 11, 2026 · you are here

Interfaze Beta

Not publicly ranked · $1.5 / $3.5

beta · beta

How to read this profile

The visual layer above carries the decisions. These notes preserve the model, ranking, coverage, and family context behind the numbers.

We track Interfaze Beta, but the public leaderboard excludes this profile until enough non-generated benchmark coverage is available. Only published rows appear above.

Interfaze Beta is a proprietary model with a 1M context window. It uses an explicit reasoning mode, which can improve complex problem solving while adding latency and token use.

9 of 381 tracked benchmark slots currently have displayable evidence. Missing categories stay blank.

Radar

Interfaze Beta release history

Full release history

Frequently asked questions

How does Interfaze Beta perform overall in AI benchmarks?

Interfaze Beta has 9 source-displayable benchmark rows, but it does not qualify for a public overall rank. The available rows remain visible by category without being converted into a site-wide score. Missing evidence stays blank instead of being estimated from an earlier model.

Is Interfaze Beta good for knowledge and understanding?

Interfaze Beta has source-displayable benchmark coverage for knowledge and understanding, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.

Is Interfaze Beta good for coding and programming?

Interfaze Beta has source-displayable benchmark coverage for coding and programming, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.

Is Interfaze Beta good for multimodal and grounded tasks?

Interfaze Beta has source-displayable benchmark coverage for multimodal and grounded tasks, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.

Is Interfaze Beta good for instruction following?

Interfaze Beta has source-displayable benchmark coverage for instruction following, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.

Does Interfaze Beta have full benchmark coverage on BenchLM?

No. Interfaze Beta currently has 10 source-displayable rows across 381 tracked benchmark slots. The profile exposes published, non-generated evidence and leaves missing categories blank until an exact evaluation is available. Coverage describes how much was measured; it is not a penalty added to an individual benchmark result.

What is the context window size of Interfaze Beta?

Interfaze Beta has a reported context window of 1M in the exact-model catalog record. The value stays visible, but the profile marks its source link as unavailable instead of presenting it as directly documented. Maximum output length remains separate because providers often publish a different limit.

Last updated August 10, 2026. Runtime fields remain blank until a sourced snapshot exists.

Watch Interfaze Beta in the weekly brief

Get one weekly email when material rank, price, availability, or benchmark evidence changes are worth revisiting.

Read a sample issue

Join 2,000+ readers.