Capability
Unranked
field median 57.6
Not eligible for a public rank
Provider changes are easy to miss. Radar watches releases, pricing, deprecations, and incidents at the source.Provider changes are easy to miss.
See RadarModel profile · Interfaze
Released May 11, 2026 — see all recent releases
Data as of August 10, 2026 · How the score is built
Published rows are visible, but no category has enough eligible evidence for a comparative rank.
9 published rows leave some tracked benchmark slots empty. Independent runtime speed has not been measured.
Each value carries a field reference instead of floating alone. Markers compare this model with the current ranked and priced catalog; they are not absolute quality thresholds.
Capability
Unranked
field median 57.6
Not eligible for a public rank
Price
$1.50input / $3.50 output
input median $1
blended $2.50
Speed
Not measured
field median 89 tok/s
Time to first token not measured
Context
1Mtokens
field median 200,000
Reported for this model; direct source link not stored
Coverage is split by category so a strong number never hides a thin evidence base. Verified means the row is tied to a published source; provisional rows remain visible but separate.
Each documented value carries its source. Missing fields stay visible as not sourced or not published, rather than disappearing from the page.
Scores and ranks appear only where published evidence can be displayed. The table keeps the score, weight, cohort, and evidence state together.
| Category | Score | Rank | Percentile | Weight | Benchmarks | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AgenticWeight 22%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 22% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| CodingWeight 20%1 benchmarkVerified | Score pending | Not ranked | Not available | 20% | 1 benchmark | Verified |
| ReasoningWeight 17%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 17% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| KnowledgeRank Not rankedWeight 12%3 benchmarksVerified | 78.7 | Not ranked | Not available | 12% | 3 benchmarks | Verified |
| MathWeight 5%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 5% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| MultilingualWeight 7%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 7% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| MultimodalRank Not rankedWeight 12%4 benchmarksVerified | 36.2 | Not ranked | Not available | 12% | 4 benchmarks | Verified |
| Inst. FollowingWeight 5%1 benchmarkVerified | Score pending | Not ranked | Not available | 5% | 1 benchmark | Verified |
Coding opens by default. The marker compares each value with the best source-verified result in the catalog; provisional leaders do not set the reference. Expand the remaining categories for every published row.
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spider 2.0-Lite | Score52.9% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Interfaze Beta · 52.9% | GapBest verified | WeightDisplay only |
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPQAGraduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A | Score89.9% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Sakana Fugu-Ultra · 95.5% | Gap5.6 behind | WeightWeighted 7% | |
| GPQA-DGPQA Diamond | Score89.9% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Sakana Fugu-Ultra · 95.5% | Gap5.6 behind | WeightDisplay only | |
| MMMLU | Score90.9% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Interfaze Beta · 90.9% | GapBest verified | WeightDisplay only |
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMMU-ProMassive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding Pro | Score71.1% | Versus best verified row Best verified: GPT-5.4 Pro · 94% | Gap22.9 behind | WeightWeighted 45% | |
| OCRBench V2 | Score70.7% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Qwen3.8 Max · 74.2% | Gap3.5 behind | WeightDisplay only | |
| olmOCRolmOCR-Bench | Score85.7% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Interfaze Beta · 85.7% | GapBest verified | WeightDisplay only | |
| RefCOCO (avg)RefCOCO average | Score82.1% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Qwen3.6-27B · 92.5% | Gap10.4 behind | WeightDisplay only |
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOB Value AccStructured Output Benchmark Value Accuracy | Score79.5% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Interfaze Beta · 79.5% | GapBest verified | WeightDisplay only |
The sequence follows explicit supersedes links. Scores and prices remain blank when the corresponding public row or first-party rate is unavailable.
May 11, 2026 · you are here
Interfaze BetaNot publicly ranked · $1.5 / $3.5
beta · beta
The visual layer above carries the decisions. These notes preserve the model, ranking, coverage, and family context behind the numbers.
We track Interfaze Beta, but the public leaderboard excludes this profile until enough non-generated benchmark coverage is available. Only published rows appear above.
Interfaze Beta is a proprietary model with a 1M context window. It uses an explicit reasoning mode, which can improve complex problem solving while adding latency and token use.
9 of 381 tracked benchmark slots currently have displayable evidence. Missing categories stay blank.
Interfaze · Model release
Interfaze Beta has 9 source-displayable benchmark rows, but it does not qualify for a public overall rank. The available rows remain visible by category without being converted into a site-wide score. Missing evidence stays blank instead of being estimated from an earlier model.
Interfaze Beta has source-displayable benchmark coverage for knowledge and understanding, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.
Interfaze Beta has source-displayable benchmark coverage for coding and programming, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.
Interfaze Beta has source-displayable benchmark coverage for multimodal and grounded tasks, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.
Interfaze Beta has source-displayable benchmark coverage for instruction following, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.
No. Interfaze Beta currently has 10 source-displayable rows across 381 tracked benchmark slots. The profile exposes published, non-generated evidence and leaves missing categories blank until an exact evaluation is available. Coverage describes how much was measured; it is not a penalty added to an individual benchmark result.
Interfaze Beta has a reported context window of 1M in the exact-model catalog record. The value stays visible, but the profile marks its source link as unavailable instead of presenting it as directly documented. Maximum output length remains separate because providers often publish a different limit.
Related resources
Last updated August 10, 2026. Runtime fields remain blank until a sourced snapshot exists.
Get one weekly email when material rank, price, availability, or benchmark evidence changes are worth revisiting.
Read a sample issueJoin 2,000+ readers.