Llama 4 Maverick
Self-host vs API cost
Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.
According to BenchLM.ai, Llama 4 Maverick ranks #115 out of 119 models on the provisional leaderboard with an overall score of 17/100. It does not yet have enough sourced coverage for BenchLM's verified leaderboard. While not a frontier model, it offers specific advantages depending on the use case.
Llama 4 Maverick is a open weight model with a 1M token context window. It processes queries without explicit chain-of-thought reasoning, offering faster response times and lower token usage.
This profile currently has 17 of 225 tracked benchmarks. BenchLM only exposes non-generated benchmark rows publicly, so missing categories stay blank until a sourced evaluation is available.
Its strongest category is Reasoning (#68), while its weakest is Instruction Following (#106). This performance profile makes it particularly strong for complex reasoning, multi-step problem solving, and analytical tasks.
Ranking Distribution
Category rank across 8 benchmark categories — sorted by best rank
Category Performance
Scores across all benchmark categories (0-100 scale)
Category Breakdown
Agentic
#94Coding
#90Reasoning
#68Knowledge
#97Math
#79Multilingual
#92Multimodal
#79Inst. Following
#106Chatbot Arena Performance
Benchmark Details
Only benchmark rows with an attached exact-source record are shown here. Source-unverified manual rows and generated rows are hidden from model pages.
Compare This Model
See how Llama 4 Maverick stacks up against similar models
Frequently Asked Questions
How does Llama 4 Maverick perform overall in AI benchmarks?
Llama 4 Maverick currently ranks #115 out of 119 models on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard with an overall score of 17 (estimated). It is created by Meta and features a 1M context window.
Is Llama 4 Maverick good for knowledge and understanding?
Llama 4 Maverick ranks #97 out of 119 models in knowledge and understanding benchmarks with an average score of 13.8. There are stronger options in this category.
Is Llama 4 Maverick good for coding and programming?
Llama 4 Maverick ranks #90 out of 119 models in coding and programming benchmarks with an average score of 8.6. There are stronger options in this category.
Is Llama 4 Maverick good for reasoning and logic?
Llama 4 Maverick ranks #68 out of 119 models in reasoning and logic benchmarks with an average score of 32.4. There are stronger options in this category.
Is Llama 4 Maverick good for agentic tool use and computer tasks?
Llama 4 Maverick ranks #94 out of 119 models in agentic tool use and computer tasks benchmarks with an average score of 12.6. There are stronger options in this category.
Is Llama 4 Maverick good for multimodal and grounded tasks?
Llama 4 Maverick ranks #79 out of 119 models in multimodal and grounded tasks benchmarks with an average score of 34.2. There are stronger options in this category.
Is Llama 4 Maverick good for instruction following?
Llama 4 Maverick ranks #106 out of 119 models in instruction following benchmarks with an average score of 22.7. There are stronger options in this category.
Is Llama 4 Maverick open source?
Yes, Llama 4 Maverick is an open weight model created by Meta, meaning it can be downloaded and run locally or fine-tuned for specific use cases.
Does Llama 4 Maverick have full benchmark coverage on BenchLM?
Not yet. Llama 4 Maverick currently has 17 published benchmark scores out of the 225 benchmarks BenchLM tracks. BenchLM only exposes non-generated public benchmark rows, so missing categories stay blank until a sourced evaluation is available.
What is the context window size of Llama 4 Maverick?
Llama 4 Maverick has a context window of 1M, which determines how much text it can process in a single interaction.
Related Resources
Don't miss the next GPT moment
Which models moved up, what’s new, and what it costs. One email a week, 3-min read.
Free. One email per week.