Skip to main content
BenchLM
Data

Data as of October 25, 2026 · How the score is built

Superseded.Inception has newer models in this line:Mercury 2.5Mercury 2.5 Preview
SupersededProprietaryReasoning

Released Feb 24, 2026128K context

Mercury 2 model card

Decision readingMercury 2 remains supported for existing customers. Inception released its successor, Mercury 2.5, on September 8, 2026 with a 260K context window and launch pricing of $0.04 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens. The benchmark ledger on this page belongs to Mercury 2; the successor has its own model record.

Released Feb 24, 2026 — see all recent releases

Decision snapshot

Each value carries a field reference instead of floating alone. Markers compare this model with the current ranked and priced catalog; they are not absolute quality thresholds.

Capability

33.6/100

field median 50#170 of 228 ranked models

Public

#170of 228

Verified —

Price

$0.25input / $0.75 output

input median $0.75cached $0.025 · blended $0.50

Speed

513tok/s

field median 96 tok/sFirst token 6.39 s

Context

128Ktokens

field median 256,000Reported for this model; direct source link not stored

Strongest published evidence

Agentic ranks #122. Particularly useful for coding agents, browser research, and computer-use workflows.

Validate before choosing

9 published rows leave some tracked benchmark slots empty. Coding is its lowest eligible category at #134.

Source-linked · 9 displayable benchmark rows

Category score record

Scores and ranks appear only where published evidence can be displayed. The table keeps the score, weight, cohort, and evidence state together.

Category scores, ranks, weighting, benchmark coverage, and evidence status
CategoryScore
AgenticRank #122 of 132Percentile 8thWeight 22%3 benchmarksVerified
12.8
CodingRank #134 of 153Percentile 13thWeight 20%2 benchmarksVerified
16.0
ReasoningWeight 17%0 benchmarksNot measured
Not measured
MultimodalWeight 12%0 benchmarksNot measured
Not measured
KnowledgeRank Not rankedWeight 12%2 benchmarksVerified
58.5
MultilingualWeight 7%0 benchmarksNot measured
Not measured
Inst. FollowingRank Not rankedWeight 5%1 benchmarkVerified
70.9
MathWeight 5%1 benchmarkVerified
Score pending

9 of 766 tracked benchmark slots have displayable evidence · bars run 0–100

Coverage details

How much of this is verified

Coverage is split by category so a strong number never hides a thin evidence base. Verified means the row is tied to a published source; provisional rows remain visible but separate.

  1. Agentic3/3 verified
  2. Coding2/2 verified
  3. ReasoningNot measured
  4. MultimodalNot measured
  5. Knowledge2/2 verified
  6. MultilingualNot measured
  7. Inst. Following1/1 verified
  8. Math1/1 verified
Verified sourceProvisionalNot measured

Capability shape

Each axis shows percentile within that category’s eligible cohort. The comparison outline is the median of the six nearest public-score peers; a collapsed vertex means the category is not rank-eligible.

Mercury 2 category percentile values

  • Agentic8th percentile
  • Coding13th percentile
  • ReasoningNot eligible
  • MultimodalNot eligible
  • KnowledgeNot eligible
  • MultilingualNot eligible
  • Instruction followingNot eligible
  • MathNot eligible

The dashed outline is median of 6 nearest peers.

Eligible category ranks

  1. Agentic#122/132
  2. Coding#134/153
  3. ReasoningNot ranked
  4. MultimodalNot ranked
  5. KnowledgeNot ranked
  6. MultilingualNot ranked
  7. Inst. FollowingNot ranked
  8. MathNot ranked
Top decileTop quartileMid-fieldNot eligible

Benchmark ledger

Coding opens by default. The marker compares each value with the best source-verified result in the catalog; provisional leaders do not set the reference. Expand the remaining categories for every published row.

Coding2 rows
Coding benchmark values, best verified comparison, weight, and source status
SciCodeScientific Code BenchmarkScore38.4%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Sakana Fugu · 60.1%

Gap21.7 behindWeight10% ref. weight
LiveCodeBenchLiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for CodeScore67.3%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Solar Pro 4 · 87.8%

Gap20.5 behindWeightDisplay only
Agentic3 rows
Agentic benchmark values, best verified comparison, weight, and source status
DeepSearchQAScore34.0%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Atria Dawn Preview · 96.0%

Gap62 behindWeight2% ref. weight
PinchBenchScore78.0%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Pokee-Isaac 28B · 95.7%

Gap17.7 behindWeightDisplay only
WideResearchScore92.3%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Hy4 preview · 83.9%

Gap8.4 behindWeightDisplay only
Knowledge2 rows
Knowledge benchmark values, best verified comparison, weight, and source status
GPQAGraduate-Level Google-Proof Q&AScore73.6%Versus best verified row

Best verified: GPT-6 Astra · 96%

Gap22.4 behindWeight3% ref. weight
GPQA-DGPQA DiamondScore73.6%Versus best verified row

Best verified: GPT-6 Astra · 96.0%

Gap22.4 behindWeightDisplay only
Inst. Following1 row
Inst. Following benchmark values, best verified comparison, weight, and source status
IFBenchInstruction Following BenchmarkScore71.3%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Flint · 89.2%

Gap17.9 behindWeightWeighted 70%
Math1 row
Math benchmark values, best verified comparison, weight, and source status
AIME 2025American Invitational Mathematics Examination 2025Score91.1%Versus best verified row

Best verified: GPT-5.2 · 100%

Gap8.9 behindWeightDisplay only

Bars run 0–100; the dark tick marks the best source-verified value

All 9 rows

What it costs to get this score

Published API price against the public score. The x-axis uses a log scale; the dashed path marks models that are not beaten by a cheaper, higher-scoring option. Price uses average of published input and output rates.

Current modelExplore all models

Mercury 2 · 33.6 score · $0.50 blended per million tokens

The chart opens on the current model. Scroll horizontally to inspect the full price axis.

2030405060708090100$0.10$0.50$1$5$10$25$50$100↘ frontierMercury 2

Horizontal: blended price per million tokens, log scale · Vertical: public score

Lineage

The sequence follows explicit supersedes links. Each score is estimated for that model; a relative can inform a sparse estimate but never sets a floor, so a newer release can score below an earlier one. Scores and prices remain blank when the corresponding public row or first-party rate is unavailable.

  1. Feb 24, 2026 · you are here

    Mercury 2

    Score 33.6 · $0.25 / $0.75

  2. Sep 8, 2026

    Mercury 2.5

    Score 33.9 · $0.04 / $0.15

  3. Aug 31, 2026

    Mercury 2.5 Preview

    Not publicly ranked · Price not listed

Base entry

Spec sheet

Each documented value carries its source. Missing fields stay visible as not sourced or not published, rather than disappearing from the page.

API model ID
Not published
Context window
128K
Maximum output
Not sourced yet
Knowledge cutoff
Not sourced yet
Input modalities
Not sourced yet
Output modalities
Not sourced yet
Parameters
Not disclosed by the provider
Availability
Mercury 2 remains supported for existing customers. Inception’s September 8, 2026 models page directs customers to their representative or documentation for access and migration to Mercury 2.5.
Cloud regions
Not tracked yet
Lifecycle
Superseded
API capabilities
Tool calling, structured outputs, and batch support are not tracked yet
Prompt caching
Published at $0.025 per million cached input tokens
Self-host
Weights are not published
Rate limits
Not tracked yet

How to read this profile

The visual layer above carries the decisions. These notes preserve the model, ranking, coverage, and family context behind the numbers.

Mercury 2 ranks #170 of 228 on the public leaderboard with a score of 33.61/100. It does not yet have enough sourced coverage for a verified position.

Mercury 2 is a proprietary model with a 128K context window. It uses an explicit reasoning mode, which can improve complex problem solving while adding latency and token use.

Mercury 2 remains supported for existing customers. Inception’s September 8, 2026 models page directs customers to their representative or documentation for access and migration to Mercury 2.5.

Inception released Mercury 2 on February 24, 2026 as a proprietary diffusion reasoning model. Its launch materials report AIME 2025, GPQA, IFBench, LiveCodeBench, SciCode, PinchBench, DeepSearchQA, and a fresh-facts WideSearch run. Those source-backed values replace their earlier entries; all remaining historical rows are retained pending primary-source verification. Independently run display rows remain separate and do not influence ranking.

9 of 766 tracked benchmark slots currently have displayable evidence. Missing categories stay blank.

Its strongest eligible category is Agentic at #122, while its lowest eligible position is Coding at #134. particularly useful for coding agents, browser research, and computer-use workflows.

Model research

Mercury 2.5 is now available

Inception’s September 8 launch introduces Mercury 2.5 with 260K context, tunable reasoning, parallel tool calls, and schema-aligned JSON. Its published standard rates are $0.20 per million input tokens and $0.75 per million output tokens; the launch offer reduces those to $0.04 and $0.15. Cached input is $0.004 during the offer.

The models page says Mercury 2 remains supported for existing customers. Ask Inception for access or migration guidance. We keep the two generations separate so Mercury 2.5 results cannot be mistaken for a new measurement of Mercury 2.

What Mercury 2 is built for

Inception released Mercury 2 on February 24, 2026 as a proprietary diffusion reasoning model. It accepts text, returns text, exposes a 128K context window, and supports tunable reasoning, tool use, schema-aligned JSON, and an OpenAI-compatible chat-completions interface.

The intended fit is latency-sensitive text work that can benefit from high sustained output: agent steps, search synthesis, coding, structured extraction, and the reasoning layer inside a cascaded voice system. Mercury 2 is not a native audio model; voice applications still need speech recognition and speech generation around it.

How to read the speed evidence

The current hosted runtime row measures Mercury 2 at 925 output tokens per second and 4.17 seconds to the first answer. Inception separately reports 1,009 tokens per second on NVIDIA Blackwell. The workloads, hardware, and timing methods differ, so the provider number remains separate from the cross-provider row.

Output rate and first-answer delay measure different parts of a request. Mercury can produce a long response quickly after generation begins while still making a user wait longer for the initial chunk than another model. Voice teams should measure end-of-speech to first audible output across the complete speech stack.

Quality evidence is sourced, but mostly provider-run

Official API pricing is $0.25 per million input tokens, $0.025 per million cached input tokens, and $0.75 per million output tokens. Inception documents the 128K window, reasoning controls, tool use, and structured output on the same first-party release page.

Mercury 2 now has source-attached results for GPQA, LiveCodeBench, SciCode, AIME 2025, IFBench, PinchBench, DeepSearchQA, and WideSearch. Most are provider-run, so the profile links each published row to its exact source and keeps unsupported historical rows hidden. The public score uses only evidence admitted by the ranking pipeline.

Last updated October 25, 2026. Runtime fields remain blank until a sourced snapshot exists.

Deployment options

Self-host and provider-specific paths stay separate from benchmark evidence so operating constraints are visible before a score becomes the whole decision.

Where to run Mercury 2 by API

OpenRouter is the one host we track that publishes a per-token price for it. Prices read from each host’s own pages on October 20, 2026.

Inference hosts for Mercury 2 with input, output and cached-input prices per million tokens.
HostInput /1MOutput /1MCached /1MContext
OpenRouter$0.25$0.75$0.025128K
Compare inference hosts

Questions

What is Mercury 2?

Mercury 2 is Inception’s proprietary diffusion reasoning model, released February 24, 2026. It accepts and returns text, has a 128K context window, and supports adjustable reasoning, tool use, schema-aligned JSON, and an OpenAI-compatible chat-completions interface. It is served as an API rather than released as open weights.

How much does the Mercury 2 API cost?

Inception lists Mercury 2 at $0.25 per million input tokens, $0.025 per million cached input tokens, and $0.75 per million output tokens. Those are first-party API rates. A production bill also depends on prompt size, reasoning output, retries, tools, and any speech or retrieval services around the model.

How fast is Mercury 2?

The current hosted runtime row measures Mercury 2 at 925 output tokens per second and 4.17 seconds to the first answer. Inception separately reports 1,009 tokens per second on NVIDIA Blackwell. Different workloads and timing boundaries mean the two figures are complementary measurements, not a failed replication.

Is Mercury 2 a diffusion LLM?

Yes. Inception describes Mercury 2 as a diffusion language model that refines multiple token positions across denoising steps rather than relying only on left-to-right token generation. The hosted weights and complete training specification are not public, so the architecture description remains first-party rather than independently inspected.

Does Mercury 2 support tool use and structured output?

Yes. Inception documents tool use, schema-aligned JSON, adjustable reasoning, and OpenAI-compatible chat completions. Applications should still validate schemas, permissions, and tool arguments outside the model. The public evidence does not yet establish a verified tool-use benchmark, so feature support should not be read as measured reliability.

Is Mercury 2 good for voice agents?

Mercury 2 can serve as the text reasoning layer in a cascaded voice agent, but it does not accept or return native audio. Teams must add speech recognition, text-to-speech, turn detection, and transport. Compare full end-of-speech to first-audio latency against native models instead of treating text throughput as voice latency.

Watch Mercury 2 in the weekly brief

Get one weekly email when material rank, price, availability, or benchmark evidence changes are worth revisiting.

Read a sample issue

Join 6,100+ subscribers.

Compare Mercury 2 with every tracked model991 comparisons