A Chinese-language academic and professional benchmark spanning humanities, social science, STEM, and applied subjects.
BenchLM mirrors the published score view for C-Eval. Qwen3.6 Plus leads the public snapshot at 93.3% , followed by Qwen3.5 397B (93%) and Claude Opus 4.5 (92.2%). BenchLM does not use these results to rank models overall.
Qwen3.6 Plus
Alibaba
Qwen3.5 397B
Alibaba
Claude Opus 4.5
Anthropic
The published C-Eval snapshot is tightly clustered at the top: Qwen3.6 Plus sits at 93.3%, while the third row is only 1.1 points behind. The broader top-10 spread is 1.1 points, so many of the published scores sit in a relatively narrow band.
3 models have been evaluated on C-Eval. The benchmark falls in the Knowledge category. This category carries a 12% weight in BenchLM.ai's overall scoring system. C-Eval is currently displayed for reference but excluded from the scoring formula, so it does not directly affect overall rankings.
Year
2023
Tasks
Chinese academic and professional exams
Format
Multiple choice questions
Difficulty
High school to professional level
C-Eval is one of the clearest public signals for non-English academic knowledge performance. It tests whether a model can sustain strong factual recall and reasoning under Chinese-language exam conditions across many domains.
Version
C-Eval 2023
Refresh cadence
Static
Staleness state
Stale
Question availability
Public benchmark set
BenchLM uses freshness metadata to decide whether a benchmark should still be treated as a strong differentiator, a benchmark to watch, or a display-only reference. For the full scoring policy, see the BenchLM methodology page.
A Chinese-language academic and professional benchmark spanning humanities, social science, STEM, and applied subjects.
Qwen3.6 Plus by Alibaba currently leads with a score of 93.3% on C-Eval.
3 AI models have been evaluated on C-Eval on BenchLM.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.