Claude Opus 4.5

Claude Opus 4.5 ranks #77 out of 224 models on the public BenchAlign leaderboard, with a score of 54.05/100. Its evidence status is Supported, and this profile shows 61 source-displayable benchmark rows. The label describes evidence depth, not a provider quality claim; inspect category rows before choosing a workload.

Claude Opus 4.5 ranks #77 out of 184 eligible models for knowledge and understanding, with a public category score of 51.2/100. Higher-ranked alternatives are available for workloads where this category decides the choice. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.

Claude Opus 4.5 ranks #64 out of 150 eligible models for coding and programming, with a public category score of 40.3/100. Higher-ranked alternatives are available for workloads where this category decides the choice. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.

Claude Opus 4.5 ranks #9 out of 12 eligible models for mathematics, with a public category score of 61.3/100. That places it in the current top ten for this category. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.

Claude Opus 4.5 has source-displayable benchmark coverage for reasoning and logic, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.

Claude Opus 4.5 ranks #89 out of 128 eligible models for agentic tool use and computer tasks, with a public category score of 32.3/100. Higher-ranked alternatives are available for workloads where this category decides the choice. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.

Claude Opus 4.5 ranks #49 out of 54 eligible models for multimodal and grounded tasks, with a public category score of 48.6/100. Higher-ranked alternatives are available for workloads where this category decides the choice. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.

Claude Opus 4.5 ranks #131 out of 148 eligible models for instruction following, with a public category score of 31.9/100. Higher-ranked alternatives are available for workloads where this category decides the choice. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.

Claude Opus 4.5 ranks #2 out of 17 eligible models for multilingual tasks, with a public category score of 96.5/100. That places it in the current top ten for this category. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.

Claude Opus 4.5 belongs to the Claude Opus 4.5 family. Related tracked variants include Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking. A sibling link indicates shared lineage or a documented configuration relationship; it does not mean the variants have identical pricing, context limits, benchmark evidence, or deployment behavior. Compare before switching.

No. Claude Opus 4.5 currently has 74 source-displayable rows across 681 tracked benchmark slots. The profile exposes published, non-generated evidence and leaves missing categories blank until an exact evaluation is available. Coverage describes how much was measured; it is not a penalty added to an individual benchmark result.

Claude Opus 4.5 has a reported context window of 200K in the exact-model catalog record. The value stays visible, but the profile marks its source link as unavailable instead of presenting it as directly documented. Maximum output length remains separate because providers often publish a different limit.