Skip to main content
BenchLM
Data

CyberGym

We show this table for reference; we do not rank on it.

Data verified

A cybersecurity task benchmark for evaluating defensive cyber workflows and vulnerability-oriented agent performance.

Benchmark score on CyberGym — October 20, 2026

We compile the CyberGym rows from benchmark-owner or independent runs, provider self-reports and secondary reports. MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the table at 95.1%, followed by MiMo-V2.6-Pro (94.0%) and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (88.1%). We do not use these results to rank models overall.

29 modelsAgenticCurrentDisplay onlyUpdated October 20, 2026

Benchmark score table (29 models)

Benchmark score results for CyberGym
RankModel / configurationScoreParameters (B)Open / closed
1MiMo-V2.6-FlashXiaomi
95.1%
Not reportedOpen
2MiMo-V2.6-ProXiaomi
94.0%
Not reportedOpen
3DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeek
88.1%
Not reportedOpen
4Ling 3.1 FlashInclusionAI
87.9%
Not reportedOpen
5Fugu CyberSakana AI
86.9%
Not reportedClosed
6Atria Dawn PreviewShanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory
86.5%
Not reportedOpen
7Gemini 3.8 Flash CyberGoogle
86.2%
Not reportedClosed
8Step 5 PreviewStepFun
84.7%
Not reportedOpen
9GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI
84.5%
Not reportedClosed
10GLM-5.3Z.AI
84.5%
Not reportedOpen
11Claude Mythos 5Anthropic
83.8%
Not reportedClosed
12DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813DeepSeek
83.3%
Not reportedOpen
13Gemini 3.5 Flash CyberGoogle
83.2%
Not reportedClosed
14Claude Mythos PreviewAnthropic
83.1%
Not reportedClosed
15MiniMax M3.1 FlashMiniMax
82.2%
Not reportedClosed
16GPT-5.6 TerraOpenAI
81.8%
Not reportedClosed
17GPT-5.5OpenAI
81.8%
Not reportedClosed
18GPT-5.4OpenAI
79.0%
Not reportedClosed
19Hy4 previewTencent
78.4%
Not reportedOpen
20GPT-5.6 LunaOpenAI
77.9%
Not reportedClosed
21DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731DeepSeek
76.7%
Not reportedOpen
22Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)Anthropic
73.1%
Not reportedClosed
23GLM-5.1Z.AI
68.7%
Not reportedOpen
24Claude Opus 4.6Anthropic
66.6%
Not reportedClosed
25Claude Sonnet 4.6Anthropic
65.2%
Not reportedClosed
26Muse Spark 1.1Meta
59.0%
Not reportedClosed
27Claude Opus 4.5Anthropic
50.6%
Not reportedClosed
28Muse SparkMeta
43.5%
Not reportedClosed
29GLM-5Z.AI
43.2%
Not reportedOpen

Among the reported CyberGym rows, MiMo-V2.6-Flash is first at 95.1%. The third row is 7.0 points behind. The broader top-10 range is 10.6 points, so the table still separates the published systems.

29 models have been evaluated on CyberGym. The benchmark falls in the Agentic category. CyberGym is currently displayed for reference but excluded from the scoring formula, so it does not directly affect overall rankings.

About CyberGym

Year

2026

Tasks

1,507 vulnerability analysis instances

Format

Vulnerability reproduction and PoC generation

Difficulty

Real-world cybersecurity

CyberGym includes 1,507 benchmark instances from historical vulnerabilities across 188 large software projects. BenchLM stores CyberGym as a display-only agentic security benchmark when exact provider comparison values are published.

Freshness and provenance

Version

CyberGym 2026

Refresh cadence

Quarterly

Staleness state

Current

Question availability

Public benchmark set

CurrentDisplay only

BenchLM uses freshness metadata to decide whether a benchmark should still be treated as a strong differentiator, a benchmark to watch, or a display-only reference. For the full scoring policy, see the BenchLM methodology page.

Questions

What does CyberGym measure?

A cybersecurity task benchmark for evaluating defensive cyber workflows and vulnerability-oriented agent performance.

Which model scores highest on CyberGym?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash by Xiaomi currently leads with a score of 95.1% on CyberGym.

How many models are evaluated on CyberGym?

29 AI models have published results on CyberGym in the BenchLM catalog.

Last updated: October 20, 2026 · BenchLM version CyberGym 2026

Know when it’s worth switching models

The model to choose, the cheaper alternative, and the release we would wait on.

Read a sample issue

Join 5,600+ readers.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.