Agentic
Like-for-like- GPT-5.4
- 56.4
- Supported · #35/151
- GPT-5.5
- 63.9
- Supported · #15/151
- Basis
- BenchAlign lane · 13 vs 13 public rows
- Reading
- GPT-5.5 leads · intervals overlap
Five or fewer confirmed AI changes, with original sources, on mornings when something changed.A free source-linked morning brief.
See the free Radar BriefUpdated September 4, 2026. Public scores include evidence status and uncertainty. They are not guarantees for a specific workload.
Decision reading
GPT-5.5 has the higher public score estimate, 73.27 versus 70.96, but the 90% score intervals overlap. Treat that as a lead, not a settled winner.
25 results are shared. Category rows resting on Estimated evidence or different benchmark sets are marked directional and do not name a winner.
Share or export
Recommendations appear only when a shared evidence basis or an explicit operating constraint supports the call. Secondary and unsupported use cases stay disclosed below the initial list.
Code generation, repair, and software-engineering tasks
GPT-5.5
GPT-5.5 leads on the public coding lane, 67.7 to 54, with Supported evidence for both models, although the 90% intervals overlap.
Confidence: limited
Tool use, computer use, and multi-step task completion
GPT-5.5
GPT-5.5 leads on the public agentic lane, 63.9 to 56.4, with Supported evidence for both models, although the 90% intervals overlap.
Confidence: limited
Prompts that approach the documented context limit
GPT-5.4
GPT-5.4 has the larger documented context window.
Confidence: documented
1K fresh input + 500 output tokens
GPT-5.4
GPT-5.4 has the lower estimated token cost for this stated workload. Costs use the listed standard API rates.
Confidence: listed-rates
200K cached + 20K fresh input + 10K output tokens
GPT-5.4
GPT-5.4 has the lower estimated token cost for this stated workload. Costs use the listed standard API rates.
Confidence: listed-rates
50K fresh input + 3K output tokens
GPT-5.4
GPT-5.4 has the lower estimated token cost for this stated workload. Costs use the listed standard API rates.
Confidence: listed-rates
Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results present for only one model describe coverage, not superiority.
2 categories rest on Estimated evidence or different evidence sets. Those rows remain visible for coverage context but do not name a winner.
Each row shows the public-lane category score for both models: the BenchAlign lane for agentic, coding, and knowledge, and the weighted public rows elsewhere, with the same rank each model page reports. A row is like-for-like only when both scores rest on Supported evidence or the same weighted set. Directional and not-comparable rows remain visible, but they never receive a winner.
| Category | GPT-5.4 | GPT-5.5 | Basis | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | 56.4Supported · #35/151 | 63.9Supported · #15/151 | Like-for-likeBenchAlign lane · 13 vs 13 public rows | GPT-5.5 leads · intervals overlap |
| Coding | 54.0Supported · #49/183 | 67.7Supported · #8/183 | Like-for-likeBenchAlign lane · 4 vs 9 public rows | GPT-5.5 leads · intervals overlap |
| Reasoning | 57.0#19/22 | 63.5#15/22 | Like-for-likeProvisional lane · 2 vs 2 weighted rows | GPT-5.5 leads |
| Knowledge | 69.2Supported · #16/181 | 73.3Supported · #7/181 | Like-for-likeBenchAlign lane · 7 vs 6 public rows | GPT-5.5 leads · intervals overlap |
| Multimodal | 69.3#20/48 | 71.3#19/48 | Directional onlyProvisional lane · 3 vs 2 weighted rows | Directional only |
| Instruction following | 90.4#19/120 | 92.9#7/120 | Directional onlyProvisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows | Directional only |
| Math | 64.5Unranked · 2 rankable rows | 69.6Unranked · 3 rankable rows | Not comparableProvisional lane · 2 vs 2 weighted rows | Not comparable |
| Multilingual | Not ranked | Not ranked | Not comparableProvisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows | Not comparable |
Ranks count the models scored in each category’s lane, so the agentic, coding, and knowledge denominators (BenchAlign) differ from the provisional-lane categories. Unranked scores sit on the lane’s scale but never name a winner. Like-for-like rows within 0.5 points read as a practical tie.
Only shared public evidence is shown. Sparse evidence stays a ruled list rather than being closed into a radar shape.
Too few matched category axes support a radar. The ruled list below shows only shared benchmark results; positions use each benchmark’s normalized display scale when available.
ARC-AGI-2
Reasoning
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)
Math
Terminal-Bench 2.0
Agentic
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)
Math
OSWorld-Verified
Agentic
Three fixed token mixes turn per-token rates into comparable decisions. Each scenario states context fit and whether cached input had to fall back to the published list-input rate.
1K fresh input + 500 output tokens
GPT-5.4 has the lower modeled cost
Costs use the listed standard API rates.
50K fresh input + 3K output tokens
GPT-5.4 has the lower modeled cost
Costs use the listed standard API rates.
200K cached + 20K fresh input + 10K output tokens
GPT-5.4 has the lower modeled cost
Costs use the listed standard API rates.
Sourced differences are shown directly. Missing facts stay explicit instead of being inferred from a model name or family.
Maximum documented context; output-token limits may be lower.
GPT-5.4
1.05M
OpenAI pricingGPT-5.5
GPT-5.4
gpt-5.4
OpenAI pricingGPT-5.5
gpt-5.5
OpenAI pricingA missing cached-input rate falls back to the listed input rate only in the stated workload estimate.
GPT-5.4
$0.25 per 1M cached input tokens
OpenAI pricingGPT-5.5
$0.5 per 1M cached input tokens
OpenAI pricingGPT-5.4
Not sourced
GPT-5.5
Not sourced
GPT-5.4
Not sourced
GPT-5.5
Not sourced
GPT-5.4
Not sourced
GPT-5.5
Not sourced
GPT-5.4
Reasoning
GPT-5.5
Reasoning
GPT-5.4
Proprietary
GPT-5.5
Proprietary
GPT-5.4
Proprietary
GPT-5.5
Proprietary
GPT-5.4
2026-03-05
GPT-5.5
2026-04-23
Run the same representative tasks against both endpoints before changing production traffic.
The full public result ledger is available for audit without forcing a wide desktop table onto a phone.
Terminal-Bench 2.0
GPT-5.5 leads this result
CyberGym
Shared sourceGPT-5.5 leads this result
BrowseComp
GPT-5.5 leads this result
OSWorld-Verified
GPT-5.5 leads this result
MCP Atlas
Shared sourceGPT-5.5 leads this result
Toolathlon
GPT-5.5 leads this result
τ²-bench results
GPT-5.4 leads this result
Claw-Eval
Not directly comparable
DeepSearchQA
Not directly comparable
Gert Labs
Shared sourceGPT-5.5 leads this result
ResearchClawBench
Shared sourceGPT-5.5 leads this result
JobBench
Shared sourceGPT-5.5 leads this result
ExploitGym
Shared sourceGPT-5.5 leads this result
OSWorld 2.0
Not directly comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals)
Not directly comparable
LiveCodeBench Pro
Not directly comparable
SWE-bench Pro
GPT-5.5 leads this result
React Native Evals
Shared sourceGPT-5.4 leads this result
Vibe Code Bench
Shared sourceGPT-5.5 leads this result
Terminal-Bench 2.0
Not directly comparable
cursorBench31
Not directly comparable
cursorBench32
Not directly comparable
FrontierCode 1.1 Main
Not directly comparable
LiveCodeBench (Vals)
Not directly comparable
SWE-bench (Vals)
Not directly comparable
ARC-AGI-2
GPT-5.5 leads this result
ARC-AGI-3
Shared sourceGPT-5.5 leads this result
MRCR v2 64K-128K
Not directly comparable
MRCR v2 128K-256K
Not directly comparable
GPQA
GPT-5.5 leads this result
GPT-5.5 leads this result
HLE w/o tools
GPT-5.5 leads this result
GPQA-D
GPT-5.5 leads this result
HealthBench Hard
Not directly comparable
MedXpertQA (Text)
Not directly comparable
HealthBench Professional
Not directly comparable
GPQA Diamond (Vals)
Not directly comparable
MMLU-Pro (Vals)
Not directly comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)
Shared sourceGPT-5.5 leads this result
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)
Shared sourceGPT-5.5 leads this result
FrontierMath (legacy)
Not directly comparable
MMMU-Pro
Tie
OfficeQA Pro
Shared sourceGPT-5.5 leads this result
MMMU-Pro w/ Python
Shared sourceGPT-5.5 leads this result
CharXiv
Not directly comparable
ERQA
Not directly comparable
SimpleVQA
Not directly comparable
ScreenSpot Pro
Not directly comparable
ZeroBench
Not directly comparable
MedXpertQA (MM)
Not directly comparable
GPT-5.5 has the higher public score estimate, 73.27 versus 70.96, but the 90% score intervals overlap. The higher estimate is not a decisive winner because the uncertainty ranges overlap.
GPT-5.5 leads the public coding lane, 67.7 to 54, with Supported evidence for both models, although the 90% intervals overlap.
GPT-5.5 leads the public agentic tasks lane, 63.9 to 56.4, with Supported evidence for both models, although the 90% intervals overlap.
For the stated presets, chat costs $0.01 on GPT-5.4 and $0.02 on GPT-5.5; repository review costs $0.17 and $0.34; the cache-heavy agent loop costs $0.25 and $0.5. Costs use the listed standard API rates.
GPT-5.4 has the larger documented context window: 1.05M, compared with 1M.
Last updated September 4, 2026
One weekly email when material rank, price, or benchmark evidence changes make this matchup worth revisiting.
Read a sample issueJoin 2,000+ readers.