Skip to main content

Model comparison

Claude 3 Opus vs DeepSeek V4 Pro (High)

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 5 shared benchmark results across 2 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

Anthropic
41.13/100
Margin
14.3pts
winning →
55.47/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Claude 3 Opus #168 (Supported); DeepSeek V4 Pro (High) #81 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Claude 3 Opus and DeepSeek V4 Pro (High) share 5 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 0 results are unique to Claude 3 Opus; 33 to DeepSeek V4 Pro (High).

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
5
Claude 3 Opus only
0
DeepSeek V4 Pro (High) only
33
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Claude 3 Opus and DeepSeek V4 Pro (High) is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 5 shared benchmark results across 2 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Claude 3 Opus is priced at $15.00 input / $75.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.43 input / $0.87 output per 1M tokens for DeepSeek V4 Pro (High). DeepSeek V4 Pro (High) has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 200K for Claude 3 Opus.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Claude 3 Opus and DeepSeek V4 Pro (High)
CategoryClaude 3 OpusΔDeepSeek V4 Pro (High)
AgenticClaude 3 OpusNot measuredMarginNo overlapDeepSeek V4 Pro (High)70.6
CodingClaude 3 OpusNot measuredMarginNo overlapDeepSeek V4 Pro (High)69.8
KnowledgeClaude 3 OpusNot measuredMarginNo overlapDeepSeek V4 Pro (High)57.0
MathClaude 3 OpusNot measuredMarginNo overlapDeepSeek V4 Pro (High)94.0

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricClaude 3 OpusDeepSeek V4 Pro (High)Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensClaude 3 Opus$15 input / $75 outputDeepSeek V4 Pro (High)$0.435 input / $0.87 outputDeepSeek V4 Pro (High) has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondClaude 3 OpusNot availableDeepSeek V4 Pro (High)Not availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenClaude 3 OpusNot availableDeepSeek V4 Pro (High)Not availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensClaude 3 Opus200KDeepSeek V4 Pro (High)1MDeepSeek V4 Pro (High) lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusDeepSeek V4 Pro (High)Result
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 63.3%Not comparable
BrowseCompSource 80.4%Not comparable
HLE w/ toolsSource 44.7%Not comparable
MCP AtlasSource 74.2%Not comparable
ToolathlonSource 49%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 94.2%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 39.9%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 1299Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource 34.4%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusDeepSeek V4 Pro (High)Result
AA Coding IndexSource 19.5%58.7%DeepSeek V4 Pro (High) leads
AA-SciCodeSource 23.3%46.4%DeepSeek V4 Pro (High) leads
CodeforcesSource 2919.0Not comparable
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 79.4%Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource 54.4%Not comparable
SWE MultilingualSource 74.1%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 63.3%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusDeepSeek V4 Pro (High)Result
MRCR 1MSource 83.3%Not comparable
CorpusQA 1MSource 56.5%Not comparable
AA-LCRSource 65.0%Not comparable
CritPtSource 10.0%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusDeepSeek V4 Pro (High)Result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 11.8%43.1%DeepSeek V4 Pro (High) leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 48.9%90.5%DeepSeek V4 Pro (High) leads
AA-HLESource 3.1%33.5%DeepSeek V4 Pro (High) leads
MMLU-ProSource 87.1%Not comparable
SimpleQASource 46.2%Not comparable
Chinese-SimpleQASource 77.7%Not comparable
GPQASource 89.1%Not comparable
GPQA-DSource 89.1%Not comparable
HLESource 34.5%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -9.7%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 41.8%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 88.6%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusDeepSeek V4 Pro (High)Result
HMMT Feb 2026Source 94.0%Not comparable
IMOAnswerBenchSource 88.0%Not comparable
ApexSource 27.4%Not comparable
Apex ShortlistSource 85.5%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusDeepSeek V4 Pro (High)Result
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1264Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusDeepSeek V4 Pro (High)Result
AA-IFBenchSource 71.3%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Claude 3 Opus and DeepSeek V4 Pro (High) on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Claude 3 Opus and DeepSeek V4 Pro (High) today?

Claude 3 Opus: $15.00 input / $75.00 output per 1M tokens DeepSeek V4 Pro (High): $0.43 input / $0.87 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.