Skip to main content

Model comparison

Claude 3 Opus vs GPT-4o mini

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 5 shared benchmark results across 2 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

Anthropic
40.36/100
Margin
3.2pts
← winning
37.14/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Claude 3 Opus #176 (Supported); GPT-4o mini #192 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Claude 3 Opus and GPT-4o mini share 5 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 0 results are unique to Claude 3 Opus; 5 to GPT-4o mini.

Updated July 24, 2026
Shared results
5
Claude 3 Opus only
0
GPT-4o mini only
5
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Claude 3 Opus and GPT-4o mini is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 5 shared benchmark results across 2 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Claude 3 Opus is priced at $15.00 input / $75.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.15 input / $0.60 output per 1M tokens for GPT-4o mini. Claude 3 Opus has the larger context window at 200K, compared with 128K for GPT-4o mini.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricClaude 3 OpusGPT-4o miniComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensClaude 3 Opus$15 input / $75 outputGPT-4o mini$0.15 input / $0.6 outputGPT-4o mini has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondClaude 3 OpusNot availableGPT-4o mini33 tok/sA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenClaude 3 OpusNot availableGPT-4o mini3.16 sA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensClaude 3 Opus200KGPT-4o mini128KClaude 3 Opus lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGPT-4o miniResult
AA Agentic IndexSource 1.0%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 0.0%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 241Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGPT-4o miniResult
AA Coding IndexSource 19.5%11.4%Claude 3 Opus leads
AA-SciCodeSource 23.3%22.9%Claude 3 Opus leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGPT-4o miniResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 11.8%6.9%Claude 3 Opus leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 48.9%42.6%Claude 3 Opus leads
AA-HLESource 3.1%4.0%GPT-4o mini leads
Multimodal
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGPT-4o miniResult
AA-MMMU-ProSource 41.5%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGPT-4o miniResult
AA-IFBenchSource 31.0%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Claude 3 Opus and GPT-4o mini on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Claude 3 Opus and GPT-4o mini today?

Claude 3 Opus: $15.00 input / $75.00 output per 1M tokens GPT-4o mini: $0.15 input / $0.60 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 24, 2026