Skip to main content

Model comparison

Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking vs GPT-4.1 nano

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 9 shared benchmark results across 6 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

35.62/100
Margin
5.5pts
winning →
41.14/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking #193 (Supported); GPT-4.1 nano #170 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking and GPT-4.1 nano share 9 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 0 results are unique to Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking; 12 to GPT-4.1 nano.

Updated July 24, 2026
Shared results
9
Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking only
0
GPT-4.1 nano only
12
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking and GPT-4.1 nano is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 9 shared benchmark results across 6 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

GPT-4.1 nano has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 200K for Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking and GPT-4.1 nano
CategoryClaude 4.1 Opus ThinkingΔGPT-4.1 nano
KnowledgeClaude 4.1 Opus ThinkingNot measuredMarginNo overlapGPT-4.1 nano50.3
MathClaude 4.1 Opus ThinkingNot measuredMarginNo overlapGPT-4.1 nano1.0
Inst. FollowingClaude 4.1 Opus ThinkingNot measuredMarginNo overlapGPT-4.1 nano83.2

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricClaude 4.1 Opus ThinkingGPT-4.1 nanoComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensClaude 4.1 Opus ThinkingNot availableGPT-4.1 nano$0.1 input / $0.4 outputA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondClaude 4.1 Opus Thinking29 tok/sGPT-4.1 nano181 tok/sGPT-4.1 nano has the higher measured throughput.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenClaude 4.1 Opus Thinking15.00 sGPT-4.1 nano0.63 sGPT-4.1 nano reaches the first token sooner.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensClaude 4.1 Opus Thinking200KGPT-4.1 nano1MGPT-4.1 nano lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkClaude 4.1 Opus ThinkingGPT-4.1 nanoResult
τ²-bench resultsSource 71.4%17.3%Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking leads
AA Agentic IndexSource 1.2%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 0.0%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 63Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkClaude 4.1 Opus ThinkingGPT-4.1 nanoResult
AA-SciCodeSource 40.9%25.9%Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking leads
AA Coding IndexSource 11.1%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkClaude 4.1 Opus ThinkingGPT-4.1 nanoResult
AA-LCRSource 66.3%17.0%Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking leads
CritPtSource 0.0%0.0%Tie
Knowledge
BenchmarkClaude 4.1 Opus ThinkingGPT-4.1 nanoResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 33.7%9.6%Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 80.9%51.2%Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking leads
AA-HLESource 11.9%3.9%Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking leads
MMLUSource 80.1%Not comparable
GPQASource 50.3%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -56.4%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 13.3%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 80.4%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkClaude 4.1 Opus ThinkingGPT-4.1 nanoResult
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 1.034%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkClaude 4.1 Opus ThinkingGPT-4.1 nanoResult
AA-MMMU-ProSource 67.9%40.1%Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking leads
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1003Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkClaude 4.1 Opus ThinkingGPT-4.1 nanoResult
AA-IFBenchSource 55.4%32.0%Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking leads
IFEvalSource 83.2%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking and GPT-4.1 nano on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking and GPT-4.1 nano today?

Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking: Pricing unavailable GPT-4.1 nano: $0.10 input / $0.40 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 24, 2026