Skip to main content

Model comparison

Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking vs GPT-5.5 Pro

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 1 shared benchmark result across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

36.55/100
Margin
27.1pts
winning →
63.69/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking #184 (Supported); GPT-5.5 Pro #38 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking and GPT-5.5 Pro share 1 comparable benchmark result. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 8 results are unique to Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking; 6 to GPT-5.5 Pro.

Updated July 22, 2026
Shared results
1
Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking only
8
GPT-5.5 Pro only
6
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking and GPT-5.5 Pro is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 1 shared benchmark result across 1 evidence category; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

GPT-5.5 Pro has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 200K for Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking and GPT-5.5 Pro
CategoryClaude 4.1 Opus ThinkingΔGPT-5.5 Pro
AgenticClaude 4.1 Opus ThinkingNot measuredMarginNo overlapGPT-5.5 Pro90.1
KnowledgeClaude 4.1 Opus ThinkingNot measuredMarginNo overlapGPT-5.5 Pro57.2
MathClaude 4.1 Opus ThinkingNot measuredMarginNo overlapGPT-5.5 Pro48.1

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricClaude 4.1 Opus ThinkingGPT-5.5 ProComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensClaude 4.1 Opus ThinkingNot availableGPT-5.5 Pro$30 input / $180 outputA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondClaude 4.1 Opus Thinking29 tok/sGPT-5.5 ProNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenClaude 4.1 Opus Thinking15.00 sGPT-5.5 ProNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensClaude 4.1 Opus Thinking200KGPT-5.5 Pro1MGPT-5.5 Pro lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkClaude 4.1 Opus ThinkingGPT-5.5 ProResult
τ²-bench resultsSource 71.4%Not comparable
BrowseCompSource 90.1%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkClaude 4.1 Opus ThinkingGPT-5.5 ProResult
AA-SciCodeSource 40.9%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkClaude 4.1 Opus ThinkingGPT-5.5 ProResult
AA-LCRSource 66.3%Not comparable
CritPtSource 0.0%30.6%GPT-5.5 Pro leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkClaude 4.1 Opus ThinkingGPT-5.5 ProResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 33.7%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 80.9%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 11.9%Not comparable
HLESource 57.2%Not comparable
HLE w/o toolsSource 43.1%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkClaude 4.1 Opus ThinkingGPT-5.5 ProResult
FrontierMath (legacy)Source 52.4%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 51.000%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 39.600%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkClaude 4.1 Opus ThinkingGPT-5.5 ProResult
AA-MMMU-ProSource 67.9%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkClaude 4.1 Opus ThinkingGPT-5.5 ProResult
AA-IFBenchSource 55.4%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking and GPT-5.5 Pro on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking and GPT-5.5 Pro today?

Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking: Pricing unavailable GPT-5.5 Pro: $30.00 input / $180.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 22, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.