Side-by-side benchmark comparison across knowledge, coding, math, and reasoning.
Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 39 to 33. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Pick Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking if you want the stronger benchmark profile. o1-pro only becomes the better choice if mathematics is the priority.
Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking
34
o1-pro
79
Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking
40.1
o1-pro
86
Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking is ahead overall, 39 to 33. The biggest single separator in this matchup is AIME 2024, where the scores are 40 and 86.
o1-pro has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 79 versus 34. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
o1-pro has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 86 versus 40.1. Inside this category, AIME 2024 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.