Side-by-side benchmark comparison across knowledge, coding, math, and reasoning.
Claude 4.1 Opus is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 69 to 43. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Claude 4.1 Opus gives you the larger context window at 200K, compared with 128K for GPT-4o mini.
Pick Claude 4.1 Opus if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GPT-4o mini only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority.
Claude 4.1 Opus
64
GPT-4o mini
82
Claude 4.1 Opus
52
GPT-4o mini
87.2
Claude 4.1 Opus
85
GPT-4o mini
87
Claude 4.1 Opus is ahead overall, 69 to 43. The biggest single separator in this matchup is HumanEval, where the scores are 68 and 87.2.
GPT-4o mini has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 82 versus 64. Inside this category, MMLU is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
GPT-4o mini has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 87.2 versus 52. Inside this category, HumanEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
GPT-4o mini has the edge for multilingual tasks in this comparison, averaging 87 versus 85. Inside this category, MGSM is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.