Skip to main content

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)

90

VS

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

88

3 categoriesvs0 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) #5 · MiMo-V2.5-Pro unranked

Pick Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MiMo-V2.5-Pro only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)
74.9vs68.4

+6.5 difference

Coding

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)
72.9vs57.2

+15.7 difference

Knowledge

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)
68.2vs48

+20.2 difference

Operational Comparison

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Price (per 1M tokens)

$5 / $25

$null / $null

Speed

N/A

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

N/A

N/A

Context Window

1M

1M

Quick Verdict

Pick Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MiMo-V2.5-Pro only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) has the cleaner provisional overall profile here, landing at 90 versus 88. It is a real lead, but still close enough that category-level strengths matter more than the headline number.

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)'s sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 68.2 against 48. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is SWE-bench Pro, 64.3% to 57.2%.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 90 to 88. The biggest single separator in this matchup is SWE-bench Pro, where the scores are 64.3% and 57.2%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 68.2 versus 48. Inside this category, HLE w/o tools is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 72.9 versus 57.2. Inside this category, SWE-bench Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 74.9 versus 68.4. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: April 24, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.