Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)
85
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
86
Verified leaderboard positions: Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) #8 · MiMo-V2.5-Pro unranked
Pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.
Agentic
+6.5 difference
Coding
+15.7 difference
Knowledge
+20.2 difference
Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
$5 / $25
$null / $null
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1M
1M
Pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro finishes one point ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 86 to 85. That is enough to call, but not enough to treat as a blowout. This matchup comes down to a few meaningful edges rather than one model dominating the board.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 86 to 85. The biggest single separator in this matchup is SWE-bench Pro, where the scores are 64.3% and 57.2%.
Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 68.2 versus 48. Inside this category, AA-Omniscience Accuracy is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 72.9 versus 57.2. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench Hard is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 74.9 versus 68.4. Inside this category, GDPval-AA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.