Head-to-head comparison across 1benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)
85
Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think
90
Verified leaderboard positions: Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) #8 · Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think unranked
Pick Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) only becomes the better choice if reasoning is the priority.
Reasoning
+30.7 difference
Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)
Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think
$5 / $25
$null / $null
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1M
2M
Pick Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) only becomes the better choice if reasoning is the priority.
Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 90 to 85. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think gives you the larger context window at 2M, compared with 1M for Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive).
Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 90 to 85. The biggest single separator in this matchup is ARC-AGI-2, where the scores are 75.8% and 45.1%.
Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 75.8 versus 45.1. Inside this category, ARC-AGI-2 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.