Head-to-head comparison across 1benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)
90
MiMo-V2-Pro
83
Verified leaderboard positions: Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) #5 · MiMo-V2-Pro unranked
Pick Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MiMo-V2-Pro only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority.
Coding
+5.1 difference
Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)
MiMo-V2-Pro
$5 / $25
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1M
1M
Pick Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MiMo-V2-Pro only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority.
Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 90 to 83. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 90 to 83. The biggest single separator in this matchup is SWE-bench Verified, where the scores are 87.6% and 78%.
MiMo-V2-Pro has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 78 versus 72.9. Inside this category, SWE-bench Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.