Skip to main content

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) vs Muse Spark

Head-to-head comparison across 5benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)

90

VS

Muse Spark

82

4 categoriesvs1 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) #5 · Muse Spark unranked

Pick Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Muse Spark only becomes the better choice if multimodal & grounded is the priority.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)
74.9vs59

+15.9 difference

Coding

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)
72.9vs61.7

+11.2 difference

Reasoning

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)
75.8vs42.5

+33.3 difference

Knowledge

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)
68.2vs50.4

+17.8 difference

Multimodal

Muse Spark
64.3vs82.2

+17.9 difference

Operational Comparison

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)

Muse Spark

Price (per 1M tokens)

$5 / $25

N/A

Speed

N/A

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

N/A

N/A

Context Window

1M

262K

Quick Verdict

Pick Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Muse Spark only becomes the better choice if multimodal & grounded is the priority.

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 90 to 82. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)'s sharpest advantage is in reasoning, where it averages 75.8 against 42.5. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is ARC-AGI-2, 75.8% to 42.5%. Muse Spark does hit back in multimodal & grounded, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 262K for Muse Spark.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (6)

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) or Muse Spark?

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 90 to 82. The biggest single separator in this matchup is ARC-AGI-2, where the scores are 75.8% and 42.5%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) or Muse Spark?

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 68.2 versus 50.4. Inside this category, GPQA-D is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) or Muse Spark?

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 72.9 versus 61.7. Inside this category, SWE-bench Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for reasoning, Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) or Muse Spark?

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 75.8 versus 42.5. Inside this category, ARC-AGI-2 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) or Muse Spark?

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 74.9 versus 59. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) or Muse Spark?

Muse Spark has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 82.2 versus 64.3. Inside this category, CharXiv is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: April 24, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.