Skip to main content

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) vs Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)

Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)

90

VS

Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)

81

2 categoriesvs1 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) #5 · Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) unranked

Pick Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)
74.9vs65.4

+9.5 difference

Coding

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)
72.9vs54.1

+18.8 difference

Knowledge

Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)
68.2vs73.9

+5.7 difference

Operational Comparison

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)

Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)

Price (per 1M tokens)

$5 / $25

N/A

Speed

N/A

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

N/A

N/A

Context Window

1M

256K

Quick Verdict

Pick Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 90 to 81. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)'s sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 72.9 against 54.1. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is SWE-bench Pro, 64.3% to 57.3%. Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) does hit back in knowledge, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for Qwen 3.6 Max (preview).

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) or Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)?

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 90 to 81. The biggest single separator in this matchup is SWE-bench Pro, where the scores are 64.3% and 57.3%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) or Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)?

Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 73.9 versus 68.2. Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Which is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) or Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)?

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 72.9 versus 54.1. Inside this category, SWE-bench Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) or Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)?

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 74.9 versus 65.4. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: April 24, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.