Skip to main content

Model comparison

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro Base

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
53.61/100
No comparison
1 category wins1 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Claude Sonnet 4.5 #96 (Estimated); DeepSeek V4 Pro Base unranked (Not scored). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Claude Sonnet 4.5 and DeepSeek V4 Pro Base share 0 comparable benchmark results. 2 of 8 categories are comparable. 12 results are unique to Claude Sonnet 4.5; 24 to DeepSeek V4 Pro Base.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
0
Claude Sonnet 4.5 only
12
DeepSeek V4 Pro Base only
24
Comparable categories
2 / 8

Treat this as a split decision. Claude Sonnet 4.5 makes more sense if knowledge is the priority; DeepSeek V4 Pro Base is the better fit if reasoning is the priority or you need the larger 1M context window.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 2 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

Claude Sonnet 4.5 and DeepSeek V4 Pro Base finish on the same BenchAlign overall score, so this is less about a single winner and more about where the edge shows up. The BenchAlign headline says tie; the benchmark table is where the real choice happens.

DeepSeek V4 Pro Base gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 200K for Claude Sonnet 4.5.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricClaude Sonnet 4.5DeepSeek V4 Pro BaseComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensClaude Sonnet 4.5$3 input / $15 outputDeepSeek V4 Pro BaseNot availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondClaude Sonnet 4.5Not availableDeepSeek V4 Pro BaseNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenClaude Sonnet 4.5Not availableDeepSeek V4 Pro BaseNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensClaude Sonnet 4.5200KDeepSeek V4 Pro Base1MDeepSeek V4 Pro Base lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5DeepSeek V4 Pro BaseResult
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 50%Not comparable
OSWorld-VerifiedSource 61.4%Not comparable
VITA-BenchSource 17.0%Not comparable
Gert LabsSource 48.51%Not comparable
JobBenchSource 27.7%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5DeepSeek V4 Pro BaseResult
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 77.2%Not comparable
BigCodeBenchSource 59.2%Not comparable
HumanEvalSource 76.8%Not comparable
ReasoningDeepSeek V4 Pro Base wins
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5DeepSeek V4 Pro BaseResult
ARC-AGI-2Source 13.6%Not comparable
BBHSource 87.5%Not comparable
DROPSource 88.7%Not comparable
HellaSwagSource 88.0%Not comparable
WinoGrandeSource 81.5%Not comparable
CLUEWSCSource 85.2%Not comparable
LongBench v2Source 51.5%Not comparable
KnowledgeClaude Sonnet 4.5 wins
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5DeepSeek V4 Pro BaseResult
GPQASource 83.4%Not comparable
AGIEvalSource 83.1%Not comparable
MMLUSource 90.1%Not comparable
MMLU-ReduxSource 90.8%Not comparable
MMLU-ProSource 73.5%Not comparable
MMMLUSource 90.3%Not comparable
C-EvalSource 93.1%Not comparable
CMMLUSource 90.8%Not comparable
MultiLoKoSource 51.1%Not comparable
SimpleQASource 55.2%Not comparable
SuperGPQASource 53.9%Not comparable
FACTS ParametricSource 62.6%Not comparable
TriviaQASource 85.6%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5DeepSeek V4 Pro BaseResult
AIME 2025Source 87%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 13.495%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 4.167%Not comparable
GSM8KSource 92.6%Not comparable
MATHSource 64.5%Not comparable
CMathSource 90.9%Not comparable
Multilingual
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5DeepSeek V4 Pro BaseResult
MGSMSource 84.4%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5DeepSeek V4 Pro BaseResult
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1219Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Which is better, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or DeepSeek V4 Pro Base?

Claude Sonnet 4.5 and DeepSeek V4 Pro Base are tied on the BenchAlign overall score, so the right pick depends on which category matters most for your use case.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or DeepSeek V4 Pro Base?

Claude Sonnet 4.5 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 83.4 versus 66.4. DeepSeek V4 Pro Base stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Which is better for reasoning, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or DeepSeek V4 Pro Base?

DeepSeek V4 Pro Base has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 51.5 versus 13.6. Claude Sonnet 4.5 stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.