Skip to main content

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Muse Spark

Head-to-head comparison across 4benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Claude Sonnet 4.5

65

VS

Muse Spark

82

2 categoriesvs2 categories

Pick Muse Spark if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Claude Sonnet 4.5 only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority or you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

Muse Spark
55.3vs59

+3.7 difference

Coding

Claude Sonnet 4.5
77.2vs61.7

+15.5 difference

Reasoning

Muse Spark
13.6vs42.5

+28.9 difference

Knowledge

Claude Sonnet 4.5
83.4vs50.4

+33.0 difference

Operational Comparison

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Muse Spark

Price (per 1M tokens)

$3 / $15

N/A

Speed

N/A

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

N/A

N/A

Context Window

200K

262K

Quick Verdict

Pick Muse Spark if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Claude Sonnet 4.5 only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority or you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.

Muse Spark is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 82 to 65. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Muse Spark's sharpest advantage is in reasoning, where it averages 42.5 against 13.6. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is ARC-AGI-2, 13.6% to 42.5%. Claude Sonnet 4.5 does hit back in knowledge, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

Muse Spark is the reasoning model in the pair, while Claude Sonnet 4.5 is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. Muse Spark gives you the larger context window at 262K, compared with 200K for Claude Sonnet 4.5.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (5)

Which is better, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Muse Spark?

Muse Spark is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 82 to 65. The biggest single separator in this matchup is ARC-AGI-2, where the scores are 13.6% and 42.5%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Muse Spark?

Claude Sonnet 4.5 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 83.4 versus 50.4. Muse Spark stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Which is better for coding, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Muse Spark?

Claude Sonnet 4.5 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 77.2 versus 61.7. Inside this category, SWE-bench Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for reasoning, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Muse Spark?

Muse Spark has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 42.5 versus 13.6. Inside this category, ARC-AGI-2 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Muse Spark?

Muse Spark has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 59 versus 55.3. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: May 22, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.