Head-to-head comparison across 1benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Claude Sonnet 4.5
66
Holo3-35B-A3B
75
Pick Holo3-35B-A3B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Claude Sonnet 4.5 only becomes the better choice if you need the larger 200K context window.
Agentic
+27.3 difference
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Holo3-35B-A3B
$3 / $15
$null / $null
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
200K
64K
Pick Holo3-35B-A3B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Claude Sonnet 4.5 only becomes the better choice if you need the larger 200K context window.
Holo3-35B-A3B is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 75 to 66. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Holo3-35B-A3B's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 82.6 against 55.3. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is OSWorld-Verified, 61.4% to 82.6%.
Claude Sonnet 4.5 gives you the larger context window at 200K, compared with 64K for Holo3-35B-A3B.
Holo3-35B-A3B is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 75 to 66. The biggest single separator in this matchup is OSWorld-Verified, where the scores are 61.4% and 82.6%.
Holo3-35B-A3B has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 82.6 versus 55.3. Inside this category, OSWorld-Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.