Model comparison
Composer 2 Fast vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Base
Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Evidence parity. Composer 2 Fast and DeepSeek V4 Flash Base share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 1 result is unique to Composer 2 Fast; 24 to DeepSeek V4 Flash Base.
Updated July 28, 2026- Shared results
- 0
- Composer 2 Fast only
- 1
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Base only
- 24
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for Composer 2 Fast and DeepSeek V4 Flash Base is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Base has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 200K for Composer 2 Fast.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Composer 2 Fast | DeepSeek V4 Flash Base | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Composer 2 FastNot available | DeepSeek V4 Flash BaseNot available | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Composer 2 FastNot available | DeepSeek V4 Flash BaseNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Composer 2 FastNot available | DeepSeek V4 Flash BaseNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Composer 2 Fast200K | DeepSeek V4 Flash Base1M | DeepSeek V4 Flash Base lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Coding3 benchmarks
Reasoning6 benchmarks
Knowledge12 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Composer 2 Fast | DeepSeek V4 Flash Base | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AGIEvalSource | — | 82.6% | Not comparable |
| MMLUSource | — | 88.7% | Not comparable |
| MMLU-ReduxSource | — | 89.4% | Not comparable |
| MMLU-ProSource | — | 68.3% | Not comparable |
| MMMLUSource | — | 88.8% | Not comparable |
| C-EvalSource | — | 92.1% | Not comparable |
| CMMLUSource | — | 90.4% | Not comparable |
| MultiLoKoSource | — | 42.2% | Not comparable |
| SimpleQASource | — | 30.1% | Not comparable |
| SuperGPQASource | — | 46.5% | Not comparable |
| FACTS ParametricSource | — | 33.9% | Not comparable |
| TriviaQASource | — | 82.8% | Not comparable |
Math3 benchmarks
Multilingual1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Composer 2 Fast | DeepSeek V4 Flash Base | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| MGSMSource | — | 85.7% | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare Composer 2 Fast and DeepSeek V4 Flash Base on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for Composer 2 Fast and DeepSeek V4 Flash Base today?
DeepSeek V4 Flash Base: Pricing unavailable Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
Know when it’s worth switching models
The model to choose, the cheaper alternative, and the release we would wait on.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.