Skip to main content

Model comparison

Composer 2 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 2 shared benchmark results across 2 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

N/A
No comparison
70.19/100
1 category wins1 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Composer 2 unranked (Not scored); MiMo-V2.5-Pro #14 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Composer 2 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro share 2 comparable benchmark results. 2 of 8 categories are comparable. 3 results are unique to Composer 2; 29 to MiMo-V2.5-Pro.

Updated July 21, 2026
Shared results
2
Composer 2 only
3
MiMo-V2.5-Pro only
29
Comparable categories
2 / 8

Treat this as a split decision. Composer 2 makes more sense if coding is the priority; MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the better fit if agentic is the priority or you need the larger 1M context window.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 2 shared benchmark results across 2 evidence categories; 2 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

Composer 2 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro finish on the same BenchAlign overall score, so this is less about a single winner and more about where the edge shows up. The BenchAlign headline says tie; the benchmark table is where the real choice happens.

MiMo-V2.5-Pro gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 200K for Composer 2.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Composer 2 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro
CategoryComposer 2ΔMiMo-V2.5-Pro
AgenticComposer 261.7Margin 6.7MiMo-V2.5-Pro68.4
CodingComposer 258.0Margin 0.8MiMo-V2.5-Pro57.2
KnowledgeComposer 2Not measuredMarginNo overlapMiMo-V2.5-Pro48.0

Decisive benchmark drivers

The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.

More
A · Composer 2B · MiMo-V2.5-Pro
  1. Terminal-Bench 2.0

    Agentic
    Source ↗
    A 61.7%B 68.4%
    Winner: MiMo-V2.5-ProΔ 6.7
    Terminal-Bench 2.0: Composer 2 scored 61.7%; MiMo-V2.5-Pro scored 68.4%. MiMo-V2.5-Pro wins this benchmark.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricComposer 2MiMo-V2.5-ProComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensComposer 2$0.5 input / $2.5 outputMiMo-V2.5-ProNot availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondComposer 2Not availableMiMo-V2.5-ProNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenComposer 2Not availableMiMo-V2.5-ProNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensComposer 2200KMiMo-V2.5-Pro1MMiMo-V2.5-Pro lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

AgenticMiMo-V2.5-Pro wins
BenchmarkComposer 2MiMo-V2.5-ProResult
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 61.7%68.4%MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Claw-EvalSource 63.8%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 1265Not comparable
τ³-bench resultsSource 72.9%Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource 29.1%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 94.2%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 38.3%Not comparable
APEX-Agents-AASource 2.4%Not comparable
Gert LabsSource 62.70%Not comparable
AA BriefcaseSource 873Not comparable
AA ITBenchSource 38.2%Not comparable
terminalBenchHardSource 43.2%Not comparable
aaTerminalBench21Source 65.2%Not comparable
AA Harvey LABSource 73.3%Not comparable
CodingComposer 2 wins
BenchmarkComposer 2MiMo-V2.5-ProResult
SWE MultilingualSource 73.7%Not comparable
SWE-RebenchSource 58%Not comparable
React Native EvalsSource 96.1%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 61.7%68.4%MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
SWE-bench ProSource 57.2%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 60.2%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 50.2%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkComposer 2MiMo-V2.5-ProResult
AA-LCRSource 73.3%Not comparable
CritPtSource 4.0%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkComposer 2MiMo-V2.5-ProResult
HLESource 48%Not comparable
HLE w/o toolsSource 34%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 42.2%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 86.6%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 33.8%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource 3.6%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 22.6%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 24.5%Not comparable
AA Openness IndexSource 38.9%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkComposer 2MiMo-V2.5-ProResult
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1298Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkComposer 2MiMo-V2.5-ProResult
AA-IFBenchSource 79.9%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Which is better, Composer 2 or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

Composer 2 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro are tied on the BenchAlign overall score, so the right pick depends on which category matters most for your use case.

Which is better for coding, Composer 2 or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

Composer 2 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 58 versus 57.2. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Composer 2 or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 68.4 versus 61.7. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 21, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.