Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Claude Opus 4.8
93
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
86
Verified leaderboard positions: Claude Opus 4.8 #3 · MiMo-V2.5-Pro unranked
Pick Claude Opus 4.8 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MiMo-V2.5-Pro only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
Agentic
+11.7 difference
Coding
+19.2 difference
Knowledge
+22.1 difference
Claude Opus 4.8
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
$5 / $25
$null / $null
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1M
1M
Pick Claude Opus 4.8 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MiMo-V2.5-Pro only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
Claude Opus 4.8 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 93 to 86. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Claude Opus 4.8's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 70.1 against 48. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is SWE-bench Pro, 69.2% to 57.2%.
Claude Opus 4.8 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 93 to 86. The biggest single separator in this matchup is SWE-bench Pro, where the scores are 69.2% and 57.2%.
Claude Opus 4.8 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 70.1 versus 48. Inside this category, HLE w/o tools is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Claude Opus 4.8 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 76.4 versus 57.2. Inside this category, SWE-bench Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Claude Opus 4.8 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 80.1 versus 68.4. Inside this category, GDPval-AA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.