DBRX Instruct vs LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.

DBRX Instruct is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 37 to 33. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

DBRX Instruct's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 48 against 8.2. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is HumanEval, 70.1 to 17. LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking does hit back in multilingual, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking is the reasoning model in the pair, while DBRX Instruct is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use.

Quick Verdict

Pick DBRX Instruct if you want the stronger benchmark profile. LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking only becomes the better choice if multilingual is the priority or you want the stronger reasoning-first profile.

Agentic

DBRX Instruct

DBRX Instruct

34.3

LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking

34.1

41
Terminal-Bench 2.0
34
31
BrowseComp
37
29
OSWorld-Verified
32

Coding

DBRX Instruct

DBRX Instruct

48

LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking

8.2

70.1
HumanEval
17
48
SWE-bench Pro
7
Coming soon
SWE-bench Verified
10
Coming soon
LiveCodeBench
9

Multimodal & Grounded

DBRX Instruct

DBRX Instruct

35.6

LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking

32.4

36
MMMU-Pro
27
35
OfficeQA Pro
39

Reasoning

LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking

DBRX Instruct

36.4

LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking

38.4

36
LongBench v2
39
37
MRCRv2
42
Coming soon
SimpleQA
29
Coming soon
MuSR
31
Coming soon
BBH
67

Knowledge

DBRX Instruct

DBRX Instruct

52

LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking

27

73.7
MMLU
27
52
FrontierScience
31
Coming soon
GPQA
26
Coming soon
SuperGPQA
24
Coming soon
OpenBookQA
22
Coming soon
MMLU-Pro
51
Coming soon
HLE
2

Instruction Following

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
IFEval
72

Multilingual

LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking

DBRX Instruct

46

LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking

60.7

46
MMLU-ProX
60
Coming soon
MGSM
62

Mathematics

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
AIME 2023
28
Coming soon
AIME 2024
30
Coming soon
AIME 2025
29
Coming soon
HMMT Feb 2023
24
Coming soon
HMMT Feb 2024
26
Coming soon
HMMT Feb 2025
25
Coming soon
BRUMO 2025
27
Coming soon
MATH-500
61

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, DBRX Instruct or LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking?

DBRX Instruct is ahead overall, 37 to 33. The biggest single separator in this matchup is HumanEval, where the scores are 70.1 and 17.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, DBRX Instruct or LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking?

DBRX Instruct has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 52 versus 27. Inside this category, MMLU is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, DBRX Instruct or LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking?

DBRX Instruct has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 48 versus 8.2. Inside this category, HumanEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for reasoning, DBRX Instruct or LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking?

LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 38.4 versus 36.4. Inside this category, MRCRv2 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, DBRX Instruct or LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking?

DBRX Instruct has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 34.3 versus 34.1. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, DBRX Instruct or LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking?

DBRX Instruct has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 35.6 versus 32.4. Inside this category, MMMU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multilingual tasks, DBRX Instruct or LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking?

LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking has the edge for multilingual tasks in this comparison, averaging 60.7 versus 46. Inside this category, MMLU-ProX is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Last updated: March 12, 2026

Weekly LLM Benchmark Digest

Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.