Skip to main content

Model comparison

DeepSeek-R1 vs GPT-4.1 mini

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 11 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

DeepSeek
50.85/100
Margin
7.8pts
← winning
43.1/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: DeepSeek-R1 #108 (Supported); GPT-4.1 mini #160 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. DeepSeek-R1 and GPT-4.1 mini share 11 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 0 results are unique to DeepSeek-R1; 11 to GPT-4.1 mini.

Updated July 24, 2026
Shared results
11
DeepSeek-R1 only
0
GPT-4.1 mini only
11
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for DeepSeek-R1 and GPT-4.1 mini is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 11 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

DeepSeek-R1 is priced at $0.55 input / $2.19 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.40 input / $1.60 output per 1M tokens for GPT-4.1 mini. GPT-4.1 mini has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for DeepSeek-R1.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for DeepSeek-R1 and GPT-4.1 mini
CategoryDeepSeek-R1ΔGPT-4.1 mini
CodingDeepSeek-R1Not measuredMarginNo overlapGPT-4.1 mini23.6
KnowledgeDeepSeek-R1Not measuredMarginNo overlapGPT-4.1 mini64.2
MathDeepSeek-R1Not measuredMarginNo overlapGPT-4.1 mini4.5
Inst. FollowingDeepSeek-R1Not measuredMarginNo overlapGPT-4.1 mini88.5

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricDeepSeek-R1GPT-4.1 miniComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensDeepSeek-R1$0.55 input / $2.19 outputGPT-4.1 mini$0.4 input / $1.6 outputGPT-4.1 mini has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondDeepSeek-R1Not availableGPT-4.1 mini80 tok/sA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenDeepSeek-R1Not availableGPT-4.1 mini0.76 sA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensDeepSeek-R1128KGPT-4.1 mini1MGPT-4.1 mini lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1GPT-4.1 miniResult
τ²-bench resultsSource 36.5%52.9%GPT-4.1 mini leads
AA Agentic IndexSource 1.7%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 0.4%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 508Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1GPT-4.1 miniResult
AA-SciCodeSource 40.3%40.4%GPT-4.1 mini leads
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 23.6%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 20.2%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1GPT-4.1 miniResult
AA-LCRSource 54.7%42.3%DeepSeek-R1 leads
CritPtSource 1.4%0.0%DeepSeek-R1 leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1GPT-4.1 miniResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 20.1%14.8%DeepSeek-R1 leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 81.3%66.4%DeepSeek-R1 leads
AA-HLESource 14.9%4.6%DeepSeek-R1 leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -27.1%-50.1%DeepSeek-R1 leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 31.0%17.5%DeepSeek-R1 leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 84.0%82.0%GPT-4.1 mini leads
MMLUSource 87.5%Not comparable
GPQASource 64.2%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1GPT-4.1 miniResult
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 4.483%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1GPT-4.1 miniResult
AA-MMMU-ProSource 58.7%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1027Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1GPT-4.1 miniResult
AA-IFBenchSource 39.6%38.3%DeepSeek-R1 leads
IFEvalSource 88.5%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare DeepSeek-R1 and GPT-4.1 mini on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for DeepSeek-R1 and GPT-4.1 mini today?

DeepSeek-R1: $0.55 input / $2.19 output per 1M tokens GPT-4.1 mini: $0.40 input / $1.60 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Self-host vs API cost

Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.

DeepSeek-R1
API / mo$2,055
Self-host / mo$18,221
Break-even583M/day
GPT-4.1 mini
API / mo$1,500
Self-host / moNot listed
Break-even
Proprietary model — self-hosting not applicable.
Model the full break-even

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 24, 2026