Skip to main content
BenchLM
Advertise

Model comparison

DeepSeek V3.2 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro Base

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
55.4/100
No comparison
N/A
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: DeepSeek V3.2 #82 (Supported); DeepSeek V4 Pro Base unranked (Not scored). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. DeepSeek V3.2 and DeepSeek V4 Pro Base share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 19 results are unique to DeepSeek V3.2; 24 to DeepSeek V4 Pro Base.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
0
DeepSeek V3.2 only
19
DeepSeek V4 Pro Base only
24
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for DeepSeek V3.2 and DeepSeek V4 Pro Base is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

DeepSeek V4 Pro Base has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for DeepSeek V3.2.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricDeepSeek V3.2DeepSeek V4 Pro BaseComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensDeepSeek V3.2$0.28 input / $0.42 outputDeepSeek V4 Pro BaseNot availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondDeepSeek V3.235 tok/sDeepSeek V4 Pro BaseNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenDeepSeek V3.23.75 sDeepSeek V4 Pro BaseNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensDeepSeek V3.2128KDeepSeek V4 Pro Base1MDeepSeek V4 Pro Base lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2DeepSeek V4 Pro BaseResult
Claw-EvalSource 40.2%—Not comparable
VITA-BenchSource 18.5%—Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 78.9%—Not comparable
Gert LabsSource 29.57%—Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2DeepSeek V4 Pro BaseResult
SWE-RebenchSource 60.9%—Not comparable
React Native EvalsSource 71.5%—Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 38.7%—Not comparable
BigCodeBenchSource —59.2%Not comparable
HumanEvalSource —76.8%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2DeepSeek V4 Pro BaseResult
AA-LCRSource 39.0%—Not comparable
CritPtSource 0.9%—Not comparable
BBHSource —87.5%Not comparable
DROPSource —88.7%Not comparable
HellaSwagSource —88.0%Not comparable
WinoGrandeSource —81.5%Not comparable
CLUEWSCSource —85.2%Not comparable
LongBench v2Source —51.5%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2DeepSeek V4 Pro BaseResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 24.7%—Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 75.1%—Not comparable
AA-HLESource 10.5%—Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -46.7%—Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 24.2%—Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 93.5%—Not comparable
AGIEvalSource —83.1%Not comparable
MMLUSource —90.1%Not comparable
MMLU-ReduxSource —90.8%Not comparable
MMLU-ProSource —73.5%Not comparable
MMMLUSource —90.3%Not comparable
C-EvalSource —93.1%Not comparable
CMMLUSource —90.8%Not comparable
MultiLoKoSource —51.1%Not comparable
SimpleQASource —55.2%Not comparable
SuperGPQASource —53.9%Not comparable
FACTS ParametricSource —62.6%Not comparable
TriviaQASource —85.6%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2DeepSeek V4 Pro BaseResult
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 22.100%—Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 2.100%—Not comparable
GSM8KSource —92.6%Not comparable
MATHSource —64.5%Not comparable
CMathSource —90.9%Not comparable
Multilingual
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2DeepSeek V4 Pro BaseResult
MGSMSource —84.4%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2DeepSeek V4 Pro BaseResult
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1204—Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2DeepSeek V4 Pro BaseResult
AA-IFBenchSource 49.0%—Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare DeepSeek V3.2 and DeepSeek V4 Pro Base on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for DeepSeek V3.2 and DeepSeek V4 Pro Base today?

DeepSeek V3.2: $0.28 input / $0.42 output per 1M tokens DeepSeek V4 Pro Base: Pricing unavailable Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Explore More

DeepSeek Compare Pricing Methodology Find Your Best LLM Overall Rankings
Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.