Skip to main content

DeepSeek V4 Flash Base vs Gemini 3.1 Pro

Head-to-head comparison across 1benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

DeepSeek V4 Flash Base

31

VS

Gemini 3.1 Pro

93

0 categoriesvs1 categories

Pick Gemini 3.1 Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. DeepSeek V4 Flash Base only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Reasoning

Gemini 3.1 Pro
44.7vs77.1

+32.4 difference

Operational Comparison

DeepSeek V4 Flash Base

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Price (per 1M tokens)

$null / $null

$2 / $12

Speed

N/A

109 t/s

Latency (TTFT)

N/A

29.71s

Context Window

1M

1M

Quick Verdict

Pick Gemini 3.1 Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. DeepSeek V4 Flash Base only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.

Gemini 3.1 Pro is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 93 to 31. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Gemini 3.1 Pro's sharpest advantage is in reasoning, where it averages 77.1 against 44.7.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (2)

Which is better, DeepSeek V4 Flash Base or Gemini 3.1 Pro?

Gemini 3.1 Pro is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 93 to 31.

Which is better for reasoning, DeepSeek V4 Flash Base or Gemini 3.1 Pro?

Gemini 3.1 Pro has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 77.1 versus 44.7. DeepSeek V4 Flash Base stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: April 24, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.