Skip to main content

Model comparison

DeepSeek V4 Flash Base vs GPT-4.1

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 1 shared benchmark result across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No comparison
OpenAI
51.11/100
0 category wins1 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: DeepSeek V4 Flash Base unranked (Not scored); GPT-4.1 #108 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. DeepSeek V4 Flash Base and GPT-4.1 share 1 comparable benchmark result. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 23 results are unique to DeepSeek V4 Flash Base; 19 to GPT-4.1.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
1
DeepSeek V4 Flash Base only
23
GPT-4.1 only
19
Comparable categories
1 / 8

Treat this as a split decision. DeepSeek V4 Flash Base makes more sense if its workflow fits your team better; GPT-4.1 is the better fit if knowledge is the priority.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 1 shared benchmark result across 1 evidence category; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

DeepSeek V4 Flash Base and GPT-4.1 finish on the same BenchAlign overall score, so this is less about a single winner and more about where the edge shows up. The BenchAlign headline says tie; the benchmark table is where the real choice happens.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for DeepSeek V4 Flash Base and GPT-4.1
CategoryDeepSeek V4 Flash BaseΔGPT-4.1
KnowledgeDeepSeek V4 Flash Base56.4Margin 9.9GPT-4.166.3
CodingDeepSeek V4 Flash BaseNot measuredMarginNo overlapGPT-4.154.6
ReasoningDeepSeek V4 Flash Base44.7MarginNo overlapGPT-4.1Not measured
MathDeepSeek V4 Flash BaseNot measuredMarginNo overlapGPT-4.14.1
Inst. FollowingDeepSeek V4 Flash BaseNot measuredMarginNo overlapGPT-4.187.4

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricDeepSeek V4 Flash BaseGPT-4.1Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensDeepSeek V4 Flash BaseNot availableGPT-4.1$2 input / $8 outputA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondDeepSeek V4 Flash BaseNot availableGPT-4.1108 tok/sA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenDeepSeek V4 Flash BaseNot availableGPT-4.11.02 sA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensDeepSeek V4 Flash Base1MGPT-4.11MListed context windows are equal.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash BaseGPT-4.1Result
τ²-bench resultsSource 47.1%Not comparable
Gert LabsSource 25.65%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash BaseGPT-4.1Result
BigCodeBenchSource 56.8%Not comparable
HumanEvalSource 69.5%Not comparable
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 54.6%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 38.1%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash BaseGPT-4.1Result
BBHSource 86.9%Not comparable
DROPSource 88.6%Not comparable
HellaSwagSource 85.7%Not comparable
WinoGrandeSource 79.5%Not comparable
CLUEWSCSource 82.2%Not comparable
LongBench v2Source 44.7%Not comparable
AA-LCRSource 61.0%Not comparable
CritPtSource 0.0%Not comparable
KnowledgeGPT-4.1 wins
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash BaseGPT-4.1Result
AGIEvalSource 82.6%Not comparable
MMLUSource 88.7%90.2%GPT-4.1 leads
MMLU-ReduxSource 89.4%Not comparable
MMLU-ProSource 68.3%Not comparable
MMMLUSource 88.8%Not comparable
C-EvalSource 92.1%Not comparable
CMMLUSource 90.4%Not comparable
MultiLoKoSource 42.2%Not comparable
SimpleQASource 30.1%Not comparable
SuperGPQASource 46.5%Not comparable
FACTS ParametricSource 33.9%Not comparable
TriviaQASource 82.8%Not comparable
GPQASource 66.3%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 19.4%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 66.6%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 4.6%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -36.2%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 24.2%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 79.6%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash BaseGPT-4.1Result
GSM8KSource 90.8%Not comparable
MATHSource 57.4%Not comparable
CMathSource 93.6%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 5.517%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 0.000%Not comparable
Multilingual
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash BaseGPT-4.1Result
MGSMSource 85.7%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash BaseGPT-4.1Result
AA-MMMU-ProSource 61.2%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1068Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash BaseGPT-4.1Result
IFEvalSource 87.4%Not comparable
AA-IFBenchSource 43.0%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (2)

Which is better, DeepSeek V4 Flash Base or GPT-4.1?

DeepSeek V4 Flash Base and GPT-4.1 are tied on the BenchAlign overall score, so the right pick depends on which category matters most for your use case.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, DeepSeek V4 Flash Base or GPT-4.1?

GPT-4.1 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 66.3 versus 56.4. Inside this category, MMLU is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.