Head-to-head comparison across 1benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Base
29
GPT-4.1 nano
26
Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash Base if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GPT-4.1 nano only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
Knowledge
+1.9 difference
DeepSeek V4 Flash Base
GPT-4.1 nano
$null / $null
$0.1 / $0.4
N/A
181 t/s
N/A
0.63s
1M
1M
Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash Base if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GPT-4.1 nano only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Base has the cleaner provisional overall profile here, landing at 29 versus 26. It is a real lead, but still close enough that category-level strengths matter more than the headline number.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Base's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 52.2 against 50.3.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Base is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 29 to 26.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Base has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 52.2 versus 50.3. Inside this category, MMLU is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.