Skip to main content
BenchLM
Advertise

Model comparison

DeepSeek V4 Flash Base vs Qwen3.7 Plus

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 4 shared benchmark results across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

N/A
No comparison
67.22/100
0 category wins2 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: DeepSeek V4 Flash Base unranked (Not scored); Qwen3.7 Plus #21 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. DeepSeek V4 Flash Base and Qwen3.7 Plus share 4 comparable benchmark results. 2 of 8 categories are comparable. 20 results are unique to DeepSeek V4 Flash Base; 65 to Qwen3.7 Plus.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
4
DeepSeek V4 Flash Base only
20
Qwen3.7 Plus only
65
Comparable categories
2 / 8

Treat this as a split decision. DeepSeek V4 Flash Base makes more sense if you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model; Qwen3.7 Plus is the better fit if reasoning is the priority or you want the stronger reasoning-first profile.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 4 shared benchmark results across 1 evidence category; 2 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

DeepSeek V4 Flash Base and Qwen3.7 Plus finish on the same BenchAlign overall score, so this is less about a single winner and more about where the edge shows up. The BenchAlign headline says tie; the benchmark table is where the real choice happens.

Qwen3.7 Plus is the reasoning model in the pair, while DeepSeek V4 Flash Base is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for DeepSeek V4 Flash Base and Qwen3.7 Plus
CategoryDeepSeek V4 Flash BaseΔQwen3.7 Plus
ReasoningDeepSeek V4 Flash Base44.7Margin→ 47.0Qwen3.7 Plus91.7
KnowledgeDeepSeek V4 Flash Base56.4Margin→ 3.7Qwen3.7 Plus60.1
AgenticDeepSeek V4 Flash BaseNot measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.7 Plus71.7
CodingDeepSeek V4 Flash BaseNot measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.7 Plus75.6
MathDeepSeek V4 Flash BaseNot measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.7 Plus92.9
MultilingualDeepSeek V4 Flash BaseNot measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.7 Plus85.4
MultimodalDeepSeek V4 Flash BaseNot measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.7 Plus81.5
Inst. FollowingDeepSeek V4 Flash BaseNot measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.7 Plus84.5

Decisive benchmark drivers

The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.

More
A · DeepSeek V4 Flash BaseB · Qwen3.7 Plus

  1. SuperGPQA

    Knowledge
    Source ↗
    A 46.5%B 71.4%
    Winner: Qwen3.7 PlusΔ 24.9
    SuperGPQA: DeepSeek V4 Flash Base scored 46.5%; Qwen3.7 Plus scored 71.4%. Qwen3.7 Plus wins this benchmark.

  2. MMLU-Pro

    Knowledge
    Source ↗
    A 68.3%B 88.5%
    Winner: Qwen3.7 PlusΔ 20.2
    MMLU-Pro: DeepSeek V4 Flash Base scored 68.3%; Qwen3.7 Plus scored 88.5%. Qwen3.7 Plus wins this benchmark.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricDeepSeek V4 Flash BaseQwen3.7 PlusComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensDeepSeek V4 Flash BaseNot availableQwen3.7 PlusNot availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondDeepSeek V4 Flash BaseNot availableQwen3.7 PlusNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenDeepSeek V4 Flash BaseNot availableQwen3.7 PlusNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensDeepSeek V4 Flash Base1MQwen3.7 Plus1MListed context windows are equal.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash BaseQwen3.7 PlusResult
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source —70.3%Not comparable
QwenClawBenchSource —61.8%Not comparable
QwenWebBenchSource —1536Not comparable
Claw-EvalSource —62.7%Not comparable
BFCL v4Source —72.9%Not comparable
MCP AtlasSource —73.2%Not comparable
VITA-BenchSource —45.6%Not comparable
DeepPlanningSource —62.3%Not comparable
OSWorld-VerifiedSource —73.3%Not comparable
AndroidWorldSource —81.0%Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource —20.8%Not comparable
APEX-Agents-AASource —22.4%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource —93%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource —21.8%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource —936Not comparable
OSWorld 2.0Source —2.8%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash BaseQwen3.7 PlusResult
BigCodeBenchSource 56.8%—Not comparable
HumanEvalSource 69.5%—Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source —70.3%Not comparable
SWE-bench VerifiedSource —77.7%Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource —57.6%Not comparable
SWE MultilingualSource —75.8%Not comparable
NL2RepoSource —41.1%Not comparable
SciCodeSource —51.3%Not comparable
LiveCodeBenchSource —89.6%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource —55.9%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource —45.5%Not comparable
ReasoningQwen3.7 Plus wins
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash BaseQwen3.7 PlusResult
BBHSource 86.9%—Not comparable
DROPSource 88.6%—Not comparable
HellaSwagSource 85.7%—Not comparable
WinoGrandeSource 79.5%—Not comparable
CLUEWSCSource 82.2%—Not comparable
LongBench v2Source 44.7%—Not comparable
CritPtSource —9.1%Not comparable
MRCRv2Source —91.7%Not comparable
AA-LCRSource —65.0%Not comparable
KnowledgeQwen3.7 Plus wins
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash BaseQwen3.7 PlusResult
AGIEvalSource 82.6%—Not comparable
MMLUSource 88.7%—Not comparable
MMLU-ReduxSource 89.4%94.5%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
MMLU-ProSource 68.3%88.5%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
MMMLUSource 88.8%89.0%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
C-EvalSource 92.1%—Not comparable
CMMLUSource 90.4%—Not comparable
MultiLoKoSource 42.2%—Not comparable
SimpleQASource 30.1%—Not comparable
SuperGPQASource 46.5%71.4%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
FACTS ParametricSource 33.9%—Not comparable
TriviaQASource 82.8%—Not comparable
GPQASource —90.3%Not comparable
GPQA-DSource —90.3%Not comparable
HLESource —34.7%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource —39.0%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource —90.0%Not comparable
AA-HLESource —33.4%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource —2.4%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource —22.2%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource —25.5%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash BaseQwen3.7 PlusResult
GSM8KSource 90.8%—Not comparable
MATHSource 57.4%—Not comparable
CMathSource 93.6%—Not comparable
HMMT Feb 2026Source —92.9%Not comparable
IMOAnswerBenchSource —86.0%Not comparable
ApexSource —22.7%Not comparable
Multilingual
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash BaseQwen3.7 PlusResult
MGSMSource 85.7%—Not comparable
MMLU-ProXSource —85.4%Not comparable
NOVA-63Source —58.8%Not comparable
INCLUDESource —83.0%Not comparable
MAXIFESource —88.8%Not comparable
PolyMathSource —84.0%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash BaseQwen3.7 PlusResult
MMMU-ProSource —79%Not comparable
MathVisionSource —90.3%Not comparable
CharXivSource —85.9%Not comparable
ERQASource —69.8%Not comparable
MedXpertQA (MM)Source —71.0%Not comparable
ScreenSpot ProSource —79.0%Not comparable
SimpleVQASource —81.7%Not comparable
MMSearch-PlusSource —41.4%Not comparable
RealWorldQASource —86.9%Not comparable
OmniDocBench 1.5Source —91.4%Not comparable
OCRBench V2Source —70.7%Not comparable
ODINW13Source —51.1%Not comparable
Video-MME (with subtitle)Source —88.0%Not comparable
VideoMMMUSource —85.4%Not comparable
MLVU (M-Avg)Source —87.4%Not comparable
AA-MMMU-ProSource —80.5%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource —1288Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash BaseQwen3.7 PlusResult
IFEvalSource —94.6%Not comparable
IFBenchSource —79.1%Not comparable
AA-IFBenchSource —78.0%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Which is better, DeepSeek V4 Flash Base or Qwen3.7 Plus?

DeepSeek V4 Flash Base and Qwen3.7 Plus are tied on the BenchAlign overall score, so the right pick depends on which category matters most for your use case.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, DeepSeek V4 Flash Base or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 60.1 versus 56.4. Inside this category, SuperGPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for reasoning, DeepSeek V4 Flash Base or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 91.7 versus 44.7. DeepSeek V4 Flash Base stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Related Comparisons

Explore More

DeepSeek Compare Pricing Methodology Find Your Best LLM Overall Rankings
Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.