Model comparison
DeepSeek V4 Flash Base vs Qwen3.8 Max Preview
Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Evidence parity. DeepSeek V4 Flash Base and Qwen3.8 Max Preview share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 24 results are unique to DeepSeek V4 Flash Base; 0 to Qwen3.8 Max Preview.
Updated July 21, 2026- Shared results
- 0
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Base only
- 24
- Qwen3.8 Max Preview only
- 0
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for DeepSeek V4 Flash Base and Qwen3.8 Max Preview is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM does not have sourced benchmark coverage for Qwen3.8 Max Preview yet. This comparison is currently limited to metadata such as context window, reasoning mode, and pricing where available.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash Base | Qwen3.8 Max Preview | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | DeepSeek V4 Flash BaseNot available | Qwen3.8 Max PreviewNot available | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | DeepSeek V4 Flash BaseNot available | Qwen3.8 Max PreviewNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | DeepSeek V4 Flash BaseNot available | Qwen3.8 Max PreviewNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | DeepSeek V4 Flash Base1M | Qwen3.8 Max PreviewNot available | A complete context comparison is not available. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Coding2 benchmarks
Reasoning6 benchmarks
Knowledge12 benchmarks
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash Base | Qwen3.8 Max Preview | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AGIEvalSource | 82.6% | — | Not comparable |
| MMLUSource | 88.7% | — | Not comparable |
| MMLU-ReduxSource | 89.4% | — | Not comparable |
| MMLU-ProSource | 68.3% | — | Not comparable |
| MMMLUSource | 88.8% | — | Not comparable |
| C-EvalSource | 92.1% | — | Not comparable |
| CMMLUSource | 90.4% | — | Not comparable |
| MultiLoKoSource | 42.2% | — | Not comparable |
| SimpleQASource | 30.1% | — | Not comparable |
| SuperGPQASource | 46.5% | — | Not comparable |
| FACTS ParametricSource | 33.9% | — | Not comparable |
| TriviaQASource | 82.8% | — | Not comparable |
Math3 benchmarks
Multilingual1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash Base | Qwen3.8 Max Preview | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| MGSMSource | 85.7% | — | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare DeepSeek V4 Flash Base and Qwen3.8 Max Preview on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for DeepSeek V4 Flash Base and Qwen3.8 Max Preview today?
DeepSeek V4 Flash Base: Pricing unavailable Qwen3.8 Max Preview: Pricing unavailable Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Base vs DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Base vs DeepSeek V4 Pro (High)
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Base vs DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max)
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Base vs DeepSeek V4 Flash (High)
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Base vs DeepSeek V4 Pro
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Base vs DeepSeek V4 Pro Base
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Base vs DeepSeek V4 Flash
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Base vs Claude Mythos 5
Explore More
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.