Skip to main content

Model comparison

DeepSeek V4 Flash (High) vs Kimi K2.7 Code

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 17 shared benchmark results across 6 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

52.97/100
Margin
1.1pts
winning →
Moonshot AI
54.03/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: DeepSeek V4 Flash (High) #97 (Estimated); Kimi K2.7 Code #92 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. DeepSeek V4 Flash (High) and Kimi K2.7 Code share 17 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 21 results are unique to DeepSeek V4 Flash (High); 6 to Kimi K2.7 Code.

Updated July 27, 2026
Shared results
17
DeepSeek V4 Flash (High) only
21
Kimi K2.7 Code only
6
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for DeepSeek V4 Flash (High) and Kimi K2.7 Code is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 17 shared benchmark results across 6 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Kimi K2.7 Code is priced at $0.95 input / $4.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.14 input / $0.28 output per 1M tokens for DeepSeek V4 Flash (High). DeepSeek V4 Flash (High) has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for Kimi K2.7 Code.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for DeepSeek V4 Flash (High) and Kimi K2.7 Code
CategoryDeepSeek V4 Flash (High)ΔKimi K2.7 Code
AgenticDeepSeek V4 Flash (High)55.3MarginNo overlapKimi K2.7 CodeNot measured
CodingDeepSeek V4 Flash (High)68.5MarginNo overlapKimi K2.7 CodeNot measured
KnowledgeDeepSeek V4 Flash (High)52.1MarginNo overlapKimi K2.7 CodeNot measured
MathDeepSeek V4 Flash (High)91.9MarginNo overlapKimi K2.7 CodeNot measured

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricDeepSeek V4 Flash (High)Kimi K2.7 CodeComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensDeepSeek V4 Flash (High)$0.14 input / $0.28 outputKimi K2.7 Code$0.95 input / $4 outputDeepSeek V4 Flash (High) has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondDeepSeek V4 Flash (High)Not availableKimi K2.7 CodeNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenDeepSeek V4 Flash (High)Not availableKimi K2.7 CodeNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensDeepSeek V4 Flash (High)1MKimi K2.7 Code256KDeepSeek V4 Flash (High) lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash (High)Kimi K2.7 CodeResult
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 56.6%Not comparable
BrowseCompSource 53.5%Not comparable
HLE w/ toolsSource 40.3%Not comparable
MCP AtlasSource 67.4%76%Kimi K2.7 Code leads
ToolathlonSource 43.5%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 95.6%90.1%DeepSeek V4 Flash (High) leads
AA Agentic IndexSource 28.2%29.6%Kimi K2.7 Code leads
GDPval-AASource 32.4%34.3%Kimi K2.7 Code leads
GDPval-AASource 11471186Kimi K2.7 Code leads
Kimi Claw 24/7Source 46.9%Not comparable
MCP Mark VerifiedSource 81.1%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash (High)Kimi K2.7 CodeResult
CodeforcesSource 2816.0Not comparable
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 78.6%Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource 52.3%Not comparable
SWE MultilingualSource 70.2%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 56.6%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 42.0%47.5%Kimi K2.7 Code leads
AA Coding IndexSource 52.0%60.8%Kimi K2.7 Code leads
Kimi Code Bench v2Source 62.0%Not comparable
ProgramBenchSource 53.6%Not comparable
MLS-Bench LiteSource 35.1%Not comparable
cursorBench32Source 49.7%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash (High)Kimi K2.7 CodeResult
MRCR 1MSource 76.9%Not comparable
CorpusQA 1MSource 59.3%Not comparable
AA-LCRSource 62.7%66.3%Kimi K2.7 Code leads
CritPtSource 3.4%10.0%Kimi K2.7 Code leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash (High)Kimi K2.7 CodeResult
MMLU-ProSource 86.4%Not comparable
SimpleQASource 28.9%Not comparable
Chinese-SimpleQASource 73.2%Not comparable
GPQASource 87.4%Not comparable
GPQA-DSource 87.4%Not comparable
HLESource 29.4%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 37.5%42.0%Kimi K2.7 Code leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 86.7%89.6%Kimi K2.7 Code leads
AA-HLESource 27.8%32.8%Kimi K2.7 Code leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -22.3%-10.7%Kimi K2.7 Code leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 35.5%38.6%Kimi K2.7 Code leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 89.7%80.3%Kimi K2.7 Code leads
Math
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash (High)Kimi K2.7 CodeResult
HMMT Feb 2026Source 91.9%Not comparable
IMOAnswerBenchSource 85.1%Not comparable
ApexSource 19.1%Not comparable
Apex ShortlistSource 72.1%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash (High)Kimi K2.7 CodeResult
Design Arena WebsiteSource 12331300Kimi K2.7 Code leads
Inst. Following
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash (High)Kimi K2.7 CodeResult
AA-IFBenchSource 73.5%63.1%DeepSeek V4 Flash (High) leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare DeepSeek V4 Flash (High) and Kimi K2.7 Code on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for DeepSeek V4 Flash (High) and Kimi K2.7 Code today?

DeepSeek V4 Flash (High): $0.14 input / $0.28 output per 1M tokens Kimi K2.7 Code: $0.95 input / $4.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Self-host vs API cost

Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.

DeepSeek V4 Flash (High)
API / mo$315
Self-host / moNot listed
Break-even
Proprietary model — self-hosting not applicable.
Kimi K2.7 Code
API / mo$3,713
Self-host / mo$18,221
Break-even326M/day
Model the full break-even

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 27, 2026

Know when it’s worth switching models

The model to choose, the cheaper alternative, and the release we would wait on.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.