Model comparison
DeepSeek V4 Flash (High) vs Muse Spark
Head-to-head evidence from 20 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: DeepSeek V4 Flash (High) #92 (Estimated); Muse Spark #13 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. DeepSeek V4 Flash (High) and Muse Spark share 20 comparable benchmark results. 4 of 8 categories are comparable. 18 results are unique to DeepSeek V4 Flash (High); 19 to Muse Spark.
Updated July 23, 2026- Shared results
- 20
- DeepSeek V4 Flash (High) only
- 18
- Muse Spark only
- 19
- Comparable categories
- 4 / 8
Pick Muse Spark if you want the stronger benchmark profile. DeepSeek V4 Flash (High) only becomes the better choice if mathematics is the priority or you need the larger 1M context window.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 20 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 4 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
Muse Spark is clearly ahead on the BenchAlign aggregate, 71.04 to 53.95. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Muse Spark's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 59 against 55.3. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is HLE, 29.4% to 50.4%. DeepSeek V4 Flash (High) does hit back in mathematics, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.
DeepSeek V4 Flash (High) gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 262K for Muse Spark.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | DeepSeek V4 Flash (High) | Δ | Muse Spark |
|---|---|---|---|
| Math | DeepSeek V4 Flash (High)91.9 | Margin← 59.0 | Muse Spark32.9 |
| Agentic | DeepSeek V4 Flash (High)55.3 | Margin→ 3.7 | Muse Spark59.0 |
| Knowledge | DeepSeek V4 Flash (High)52.1 | Margin← 1.7 | Muse Spark50.4 |
| Coding | DeepSeek V4 Flash (High)68.5 | Margin← 0.7 | Muse Spark67.8 |
| Reasoning | DeepSeek V4 Flash (High)Not measured | MarginNo overlap | Muse Spark42.5 |
| Multimodal | DeepSeek V4 Flash (High)Not measured | MarginNo overlap | Muse Spark82.5 |
Decisive benchmark drivers
The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.
More
- Source ↗
HLE
KnowledgeA 29.4%B 50.4%Winner: Muse SparkΔ 21HLE: DeepSeek V4 Flash (High) scored 29.4%; Muse Spark scored 50.4%. Muse Spark wins this benchmark. - Source ↗
Terminal-Bench 2.0
AgenticA 56.6%B 59%Winner: Muse SparkΔ 2.4Terminal-Bench 2.0: DeepSeek V4 Flash (High) scored 56.6%; Muse Spark scored 59%. Muse Spark wins this benchmark. - Source ↗
SWE-bench Verified
CodingA 78.6%B 77.4%Winner: DeepSeek V4 Flash (High)Δ 1.2SWE-bench Verified: DeepSeek V4 Flash (High) scored 78.6%; Muse Spark scored 77.4%. DeepSeek V4 Flash (High) wins this benchmark. - Source ↗
SWE-bench Pro
CodingA 52.3%B 52.4%Winner: Muse SparkΔ 0.1SWE-bench Pro: DeepSeek V4 Flash (High) scored 52.3%; Muse Spark scored 52.4%. Muse Spark wins this benchmark.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash (High) | Muse Spark | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | DeepSeek V4 Flash (High)$0.14 input / $0.28 output | Muse SparkNot available | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | DeepSeek V4 Flash (High)Not available | Muse SparkNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | DeepSeek V4 Flash (High)Not available | Muse SparkNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | DeepSeek V4 Flash (High)1M | Muse Spark262K | DeepSeek V4 Flash (High) lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
AgenticMuse Spark wins12 benchmarks
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash (High) | Muse Spark | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | 56.6% | 59% | Muse Spark leads |
| BrowseCompSource | 53.5% | — | Not comparable |
| HLE w/ toolsSource | 40.3% | — | Not comparable |
| MCP AtlasSource | 67.4% | — | Not comparable |
| ToolathlonSource | 43.5% | — | Not comparable |
| τ²-bench resultsSource | 95.6% | 91.5% | DeepSeek V4 Flash (High) leads |
| AA Agentic IndexSource | 28.2% | 28.7% | Muse Spark leads |
| GDPval-AASource | 32.4% | 32.2% | DeepSeek V4 Flash (High) leads |
| GDPval-AASource | 1147 | 1144 | DeepSeek V4 Flash (High) leads |
| DeepSearchQASource | — | 74.8% | Not comparable |
| CyberGymSource | — | 43.5% | Not comparable |
| Claw-EvalSource | — | 63.8% | Not comparable |
CodingDeepSeek V4 Flash (High) wins9 benchmarks
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash (High) | Muse Spark | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| CodeforcesSource | 2816.0 | — | Not comparable |
| SWE-bench VerifiedSource | 78.6% | 77.4% | DeepSeek V4 Flash (High) leads |
| SWE-bench ProSource | 52.3% | 52.4% | Muse Spark leads |
| SWE MultilingualSource | 70.2% | — | Not comparable |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | 56.6% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-SciCodeSource | 42.0% | 51.5% | Muse Spark leads |
| AA Coding IndexSource | 52.0% | 58.6% | Muse Spark leads |
| LiveCodeBench ProSource | — | 80.0% | Not comparable |
| Vibe Code BenchSource | — | 19.67% | Not comparable |
Reasoning5 benchmarks
KnowledgeDeepSeek V4 Flash (High) wins15 benchmarks
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash (High) | Muse Spark | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU-ProSource | 86.4% | — | Not comparable |
| SimpleQASource | 28.9% | — | Not comparable |
| Chinese-SimpleQASource | 73.2% | — | Not comparable |
| GPQASource | 87.4% | — | Not comparable |
| GPQA-DSource | 87.4% | 89.5% | Muse Spark leads |
| HLESource | 29.4% | 50.4% | Muse Spark leads |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 37.5% | 43.1% | Muse Spark leads |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 86.7% | 88.4% | Muse Spark leads |
| AA-HLESource | 27.8% | 39.9% | Muse Spark leads |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | -22.3% | 4.1% | Muse Spark leads |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 35.5% | 44.6% | Muse Spark leads |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 89.7% | 73.2% | Muse Spark leads |
| HLE w/o toolsSource | — | 42.8% | Not comparable |
| HealthBench HardSource | — | 42.8% | Not comparable |
| MedXpertQA (Text)Source | — | 52.6% | Not comparable |
MathDeepSeek V4 Flash (High) wins6 benchmarks
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash (High) | Muse Spark | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| HMMT Feb 2026Source | 91.9% | — | Not comparable |
| IMOAnswerBenchSource | 85.1% | — | Not comparable |
| ApexSource | 19.1% | — | Not comparable |
| Apex ShortlistSource | 72.1% | — | Not comparable |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source | — | 39.000% | Not comparable |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source | — | 14.600% | Not comparable |
Multimodal9 benchmarks
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash (High) | Muse Spark | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena WebsiteSource | 1238 | — | Not comparable |
| CharXivSource | — | 86.4% | Not comparable |
| MMMU-ProSource | — | 80.4% | Not comparable |
| ERQASource | — | 64.7% | Not comparable |
| SimpleVQASource | — | 71.3% | Not comparable |
| ScreenSpot ProSource | — | 84.1% | Not comparable |
| ZeroBenchSource | — | 33.0% | Not comparable |
| MedXpertQA (MM)Source | — | 78.4% | Not comparable |
| AA-MMMU-ProSource | — | 80.5% | Not comparable |
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash (High) | Muse Spark | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | 73.5% | 75.9% | Muse Spark leads |
Frequently Asked Questions (5)
Which is better, DeepSeek V4 Flash (High) or Muse Spark?
Muse Spark is ahead on BenchLM's BenchAlign leaderboard, 71.04 to 53.95. The biggest single separator in this matchup is HLE, where the scores are 29.4% and 50.4%.
Which is better for knowledge tasks, DeepSeek V4 Flash (High) or Muse Spark?
DeepSeek V4 Flash (High) has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 52.1 versus 50.4. Inside this category, AA-Omniscience Index is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Which is better for coding, DeepSeek V4 Flash (High) or Muse Spark?
DeepSeek V4 Flash (High) has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 68.5 versus 67.8. Inside this category, AA-SciCode is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Which is better for math, DeepSeek V4 Flash (High) or Muse Spark?
DeepSeek V4 Flash (High) has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 91.9 versus 32.9. Muse Spark stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.
Which is better for agentic tasks, DeepSeek V4 Flash (High) or Muse Spark?
Muse Spark has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 59 versus 55.3. Inside this category, τ²-bench results is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.