Skip to main content

Model comparison

DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) vs Gemini 3.6 Flash

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 15 shared benchmark results across 4 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No comparison
N/A
0 category wins1 category wins

Evidence parity. DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) and Gemini 3.6 Flash share 15 comparable benchmark results. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 30 results are unique to DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max); 4 to Gemini 3.6 Flash.

Updated July 21, 2026
Shared results
15
DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) only
30
Gemini 3.6 Flash only
4
Comparable categories
1 / 8

Treat this as a split decision. DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) makes more sense if you want the cheaper token bill; Gemini 3.6 Flash is the better fit if agentic is the priority.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 15 shared benchmark results across 4 evidence categories; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) and Gemini 3.6 Flash finish on the same BenchAlign overall score, so this is less about a single winner and more about where the edge shows up. The BenchAlign headline says tie; the benchmark table is where the real choice happens.

Gemini 3.6 Flash is also the more expensive model on tokens at $1.50 input / $7.50 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.14 input / $0.28 output per 1M tokens for DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max). That is roughly 26.8x on output cost alone.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) and Gemini 3.6 Flash
CategoryDeepSeek V4 Flash (Max)ΔGemini 3.6 Flash
AgenticDeepSeek V4 Flash (Max)63.8Margin 19.2Gemini 3.6 Flash83.0
CodingDeepSeek V4 Flash (Max)68.8MarginNo overlapGemini 3.6 FlashNot measured
KnowledgeDeepSeek V4 Flash (Max)55.3MarginNo overlapGemini 3.6 FlashNot measured
MathDeepSeek V4 Flash (Max)94.8MarginNo overlapGemini 3.6 FlashNot measured

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricDeepSeek V4 Flash (Max)Gemini 3.6 FlashComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensDeepSeek V4 Flash (Max)$0.14 input / $0.28 outputGemini 3.6 Flash$1.5 input / $7.5 outputDeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondDeepSeek V4 Flash (Max)Not availableGemini 3.6 FlashNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenDeepSeek V4 Flash (Max)Not availableGemini 3.6 FlashNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensDeepSeek V4 Flash (Max)1MGemini 3.6 Flash1MListed context windows are equal.

Benchmark Deep Dive

AgenticGemini 3.6 Flash wins
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash (Max)Gemini 3.6 FlashResult
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 56.9%Not comparable
BrowseCompSource 73.2%Not comparable
HLE w/ toolsSource 45.1%Not comparable
MCP AtlasSource 69%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 11891421Gemini 3.6 Flash leads
ToolathlonSource 47.8%Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource 31.1%38.7%Gemini 3.6 Flash leads
τ²-bench resultsSource 95%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 34.4%46.1%Gemini 3.6 Flash leads
AA BriefcaseSource 831961Gemini 3.6 Flash leads
AA EnterpriseOps-GymSource 39.6%Not comparable
AA Harvey LABSource 81.3%Not comparable
AA ITBenchSource 31.5%Not comparable
AA Tau3 BankingSource 22.9%24.5%Gemini 3.6 Flash leads
terminalBenchHardSource 35.6%Not comparable
OSWorld-VerifiedSource 83%Not comparable
aaTerminalBench21Source 77.5%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash (Max)Gemini 3.6 FlashResult
CodeforcesSource 3052.0Not comparable
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 79%Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource 52.6%Not comparable
SWE MultilingualSource 73.3%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 56.9%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 56.2%69.2%Gemini 3.6 Flash leads
AA-SciCodeSource 44.9%52.7%Gemini 3.6 Flash leads
deepSweSource 49%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash (Max)Gemini 3.6 FlashResult
MRCR 1MSource 78.7%Not comparable
CorpusQA 1MSource 60.5%Not comparable
AA-LCRSource 63.0%69.7%Gemini 3.6 Flash leads
CritPtSource 7.1%10.6%Gemini 3.6 Flash leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash (Max)Gemini 3.6 FlashResult
MMLU-ProSource 86.2%Not comparable
SimpleQASource 34.1%Not comparable
Chinese-SimpleQASource 78.9%Not comparable
GPQASource 88.1%Not comparable
GPQA-DSource 88.1%Not comparable
HLESource 34.8%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 40.3%50.1%Gemini 3.6 Flash leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 89.4%92.8%Gemini 3.6 Flash leads
AA-HLESource 32.1%38.3%Gemini 3.6 Flash leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -22.9%23.5%Gemini 3.6 Flash leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 37.2%50.2%Gemini 3.6 Flash leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 95.8%53.5%Gemini 3.6 Flash leads
AA Openness IndexSource 50.0%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash (Max)Gemini 3.6 FlashResult
HMMT Feb 2026Source 94.8%Not comparable
IMOAnswerBenchSource 88.4%Not comparable
ApexSource 33.0%Not comparable
Apex ShortlistSource 85.7%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash (Max)Gemini 3.6 FlashResult
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1238Not comparable
AA-MMMU-ProSource 83.2%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash (Max)Gemini 3.6 FlashResult
AA-IFBenchSource 79.2%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (2)

Which is better, DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) or Gemini 3.6 Flash?

DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) and Gemini 3.6 Flash are tied on the BenchAlign overall score, so the right pick depends on which category matters most for your use case.

Which is better for agentic tasks, DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) or Gemini 3.6 Flash?

Gemini 3.6 Flash has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 83 versus 63.8. Inside this category, GDPval-AA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 21, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.